Value of fat suppression in gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging

Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound

Volumn 52, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  D'Anjou, Marc André ^a   Carmel, Éric Norman ^a   Tidwell, Amy S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Veterinary Imaging Consultant   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain; Cat; Dog; Fat suppression; Magnetic resonance imaging; Nerve; Spine

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASE; DRUG EFFECT; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ANIMALS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; CONTRAST MEDIA; GADOLINIUM; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ANIMALIA; CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 79952529624     PISSN: 10588183     EISSN: 17408261     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2010.01789.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Colosimo C, Cianfoni A, Di Lella GM, Gaudino S. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the spine: when, why and how? How to optimize contrast protocols in MR imaging of the spine. Neuroradiology 2006;48 (Suppl 1):18-33.
2. Adams WH. The spine. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 1999;14:148-159.
3. Kraft S, Ehrhart EJ, Gall D., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of peripheral nerve sheath tumors of the canine brachial plexus in 18 dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007;48:1-7.
4. Kippenes H, Gavin PR, Bagley RS, Silver GM, Tucker RL, Sande RD. Magnetic resonance imaging features of tumors of the spine and spinal cord in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1999;40:627-633.
5. Levitski RE, Lipsitz D, Chauvet AE. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine in 27 dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1999;40:332-341.
6. An HS, Nguyen C, Haughton VM, Ho KC, Hasegawa T. Gadolinium-enhancement characteristics of magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing herniated intervertebral disc versus scar in dogs. Spine 1994;19:2089-2094; discussion 2095.
7. Tien RD. Fat-suppression MR imaging in neuroradiology: techniques and clinical application. Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:369-379.
8. Simon JH, Rubinstein D. Contrast-enhanced fat-suppression neuroimaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1994;4:153-173.
9. Georgy BA, Hesselink JR. Evaluation of fat suppression in contrast-enhanced MR of neoplastic and inflammatory spine disease. Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:409-417.
10. Georgy BA, Hesselink JR, Middleton MS. Quantitative analysis of signal intensities and contrast after fat suppression in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Acad Radiol 1996;3:731-734.
11. Delfaut EM, Beltran J, Johnson G, Rousseau J, Marchandise X, Cotten A. Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls. Radiographics 1999;19:373-382.
12. Georgy BA, Hesselink JR. MR imaging of the spine: recent advances in pulse sequences and special techniques. Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:923-934.
13. Hood MN, Ho VB, Smirniotopoulos JG, Szumowski J. Chemical shift: the artifact and clinical tool revisited. Radiographics 1999;19:357-371.
14. Barakos JA, Dillon WP, Chew WM. Orbit, skull base, and pharynx: contrast-enhanced fat suppression MR imaging. Radiology 1991;179:191-198.
15. Daniel GB, Mitchell SK. The eye and orbit. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 1999;14:160-169.
16. Hendrix LE, Kneeland JB, Haughton VM, et al. MR imaging of optic nerve lesions: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine and fat-suppression technique. Am J Roentgenol 1990;155:849-854.
17. Penninck D, Daniel GB, Brawer R, Tidwell AS. Cross-sectional imaging techniques in veterinary ophthalmology. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2001;16:22-39.
18. Tien RD, Chu PK, Hesselink JR, Szumowski J. Intra- and paraorbital lesions: value of fat-suppression MR imaging with paramagnetic contrast enhancement. Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:245-253.
19. d'Anjou M-A, Carmel EN, Blond L, Beauchamp G, Parent J. MRI qualitative and quantitative characterisation of meningeal enhancement in dogs and cats: effect of acquisition time and chemical fat suppression. Annual Meeting of the American College of Veterinary Radiology, Tennessee, TX, 2009.
20. McDonnell JJ, Tidwell AS, Faissler D, Keating J. Magnetic resonance imaging features of cervical spinal cord meningiomas. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005;46:368-374.
21. Graham JP, Newell SM, Voges AK, Roberts GD, Harrison JM. The dural tail sign in the diagnosis of meningiomas. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1998;39:297-302.
22. Petersen SA, Sturges BK, Dickinson PJ, et al. Canine intraspinal meningiomas: imaging features, histopathologic classification, and long-term outcome in 34 dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2008;22:946-953.
23. Rokni-Yazdi H, Azmoudeh Ardalan F, Asadzandi Z, et al. Pathologic significance of the "dural tail sign". Eur J Radiol 2008;70:10-16.
24. Tien RD, Olson EM, Zee CS. Diseases of the lumbar spine: findings on fat-suppression MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:95-99.
25. De Stefani A, Garosi LS, McConnell FJ, Diaz FJ, Dennis R, Platt SR. Magnetic resonance imaging features of spinal epidural empyema in five dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2008;49:135-140.
26. Platt SR, McConnell JF, Garosi LS, Ladlow J, de Stefani A, Shelton GD. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of canine inflammatory myopathies in three dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006;47:532-537.
27. Lovitt S, Moore SL, Marden FA. The use of MRI in the evaluation of myopathy. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:486-495.
28. Morgan LW, Toal R, Siemering G, Gavin P. Imaging diagnosis-infiltrative lipoma causing spinal cord compression in a dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007;48:35-37.