The effect of some factors on elementary education third grade students' reading achievements and these achievements

Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 713-724

  Yilmaz, Muamber ^a  

^a MUSTAFA KEMAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Oral reading mistake; Reading achievement; Reading comprehension

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861125040     PISSN: 13087711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Akyol H. Turkce Okuma Yazma Ogretimi. Gunduz Education and Publication, Ankara, 2003 [in Turkish].
2. Demirel O. Turkce Ogretimi. Pegem A Publication, Ankara, 2000.
3. Samuels S. J. The method of repeated readings. Read Teacher 1979;32:403-408.
4. Bruck M. The word recognition and spelling of dyslexic children. Read Res Quart 1998;23:51-69.
5. Salinger T. Helping older struggling readers. Preventing School Failure 2003;47:79-85.
6. Yilmaz M. Ilkogretim 3. Si{dotless}ni{dotless}f Ogrencilerinin Sesli Okuma Hatalari{dotless}ni{dotless} Duzeltmede ve Okudugunu Anlama Becerilerini Gelistirmede Tekrarli{dotless} Okuma Yönteminin Etkisi. PhD. Thesis Gazi University, Ankara, 2006 [in Turkish].
7. Harris AJ, Sipay ER. How to Increase Reading Ability A Guide to Developmental Remedial Methods. Longman, New York, 1990.
8. Salvia J, Ysseldyke JE. Assesment in Special and Remedial Education. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 1978.
9. Dechant E. Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Disability. Parker Publishing Company Inc, USA, 1968.
10. Akyol H. Turkce Ilk Okuma Yazma Ogretimi, Pegem A Publication, Ankara, 2005 [in Turkish].
11. Tok H. Classroom instructional responsibilities and learner atonomy: A case study in Turkey. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:211-220.
12. Rasinski TV. Effects of repeated reading and listening while reading on reading fluency. J Educ Res 1990;83:147-150.
13. Nelson JS, Alber SR, Gordy A. (2004). Effects of systematic error correction and repeated readings on the reading accuracy and proficiency of second graders with disabilities. Educ Treatment Children 2004;27:186-198.
14. Chafouleas SM, Martens BK, Dobson R L, Weinstein KS, Gardner KB. Fluent reading as the improvement of stimulus control: additive effects of performance based interventions to repeated reading on students' reading and error rates. J Behav Educ 2004;13:67-81.
15. Au K. H. Analyzing oral reading errors to improve instruction. Read Teacher 1997;31:46-49.
16. Selvey A. S. Effects of Repeated Reading on Decoding Disfluency and Reading Comprehension, PhD. Dissertation Univ. of, college of arts and sciences, Florida, 1989.
17. Morgan A, Wilcox BR, Eldredge JL. Effect of difficulty levels on second grade delayed readers using dyad reading, The Journal of Educational Research 2000; 94:113-119.
18. Thompson SL, Davis PH. Supplemental reading instruction for students at risk for reading disabilities: Improve reading 30 minutes at a time. Learn Disab Pract 2002;17:242-251.
19. Danielsson K. Beginning readers sensitivity to different linguistic levels: An error and correction analysis at the lexical, syntactic and semantic levels, Read Writ Interdiscip J 2001;14:395-421.
20. Valleley RJ, Shriver MD. An examination of the effects of repeated readings with seceondary students. J Behav Educ 2003;12:55-76.
21. Eripek S. Alt ozel si{dotless}ni{dotless}f ogrencilerinin ilkokul si{dotless}ni{dotless}flari{dotless} duzeyinde sesli okuma basarilarinin degerlendirilmesi. Eskisehir AU J Educ Fac 1989;2:125-139.
22. Tazebay A. Ilkokul Ucuncu ve Dorduncu Sinif Ogrencilerinin Okuma Becerilerinin Okudugunu Anlamaya Etkisi, PhD. Thesis Hacettepe University, Ankara, 1995 [in Turkish].
23. Mavi S. Okuma Hatalarininn Okuma Aliskanligina Etkisi. MsD. Thesis Ankara University, Ankara, 1995 [in Turkish].
24. Acat B. Okuma Guclukleri ile Okudugunu Anlama Becerisi Arasi{dotless}ndaki Iliski Duzeyi, MsD. Thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara, 1996 [in Turkish].
25. Senel HG. Okuma Guclugu Olan ve Olmayan Ilkokul Ogrencilerinin Okuma Duzeylerinin ve Dislektik Ozelliklerinin Karsilaştiirilmasi. PhD. Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, 1998 [in Turkish].
26. Yilmaz M. Ilkoetim Okullari{dotless} 4. Si{dotless}ni{dotless}f Ogrencilerinin Yaptiklari Sesli Okuma Hatalarinin Anlama Basarilarina Etkisi. MsD. Thesis Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, 1996 [in Turkish].
27. Razon N. Okuma guclukleri. Educ Sci 1982;9:19-29.
28. Joshi RM, Dahlgren M, Boulware GR. Teaching reading in an inner city school through a multisensory teaching approach. Annals Dyslexia 2002;52:229-242.
29. Baghban M. Siblings can help with reading. Read Today 1995;12:17.
30. Johnston F, Curry J, Nielsen D, Pace G. Using children's choices: Tips for families. Read Today 1995;12:18.
31. Senemoglu N. Cocuk haklari, calisan cocuklar ve egitim sorunlari. Nat Educ J 2001;151:25-35.
32. Noble KG, Farah MJ, McCandliss BD. Socioeconomic background modulates cognition achievement relationships in reading. Cognit Develop 2006;21:349-368.
33. Bravo-Valdivieso L. A four year follow up study of low socioeconomic status Latin American children with reading difficulties. Int J Disab Develop Educn 1995;42:189-202.
34. Bowey JA. Socioeconomic status differences in preschool phonological sensitivity and first grade reading achievement. J Educ Psychol 1995;87:476-487.
35. Shaver A, Walls R. Effect of title 1 parent involvement on student reading and mathematics achievement. J Res Develop Educ 1998;31:90-7.
36. Hara S, Burke D. Parental involvement: the key to improved student achievement. School J 1998;8:9-19.
37. Zellman G, Waterman J. Understanding the impact of parent and school involvement on children's educational outcomes. J Educ Res 1998;9:370-380.
38. O'Sullivan JT. Reading Beliefs and Reading Achievement: A Development Study of Students from Low Income Families. Memorial University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 354505), 1992.
39. Brookover W, Beady C, Flood P, Schweitzer J, Wisenbaker J. School Social Systems and Student Achievement: Schools Can Make A Difference, Praeger, New York, 1979.
40. So AY, Chan KS. What Matters? The Relative Impact of Language Background and Socioeconomic Status on Reading Achievement. Los Alamitos, CA: National Center for Bilingual Research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 234643), 1982.
41. Perrin JA. The Relationship of Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status to Reading. Texas Tech University. Ed.D. Dissertation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 132550), 1976.
42. Bewley WL. The Effects of Family Structure, Socioeconomic Status and Pupil Gender Upon Children's Reading Readiness Scores. The University of Oklahoma. PhD. Dissertation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 119107), 1975.
43. Tompkins C. The Effects of Socioeconomic Differences on First Grade Children's Expectations of and Attitudes Toward Reading. San Francisco: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 169490), 1979.
44. May FB. Reading As Communication: An Interactive Approach, Merril Publishing Company, USA, 1986.
45. Singh N, Singh J. Antecedent control of oral reading errors and self corrections by mentally retarded children. J Appl Behavr Anals 1984;17:111-119.
46. Rosenberg MS. Error correction during oral reading: a comparison of three techniques. Learn Disab Quart 1986;9:182-192.
47. Simons HD. The Effect of Repeated Reading of Predictable Text on Word Recognition and Decoding: A Descriptive Study of Six First Grade Students. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED 353 543), 1992.
48. Pany D, Mccoy MK. Effects of corrective feedback on word accuracy and reading comprehension of readers with learning disabilities. J Learn Disab 1988;21:546-550.
49. Morris D, Nelson L. Supported oral reading with low achieving second graders. Read Res Instruc 1992;32:49-63.
50. Perkins VL. Feedback effects on oral reading errors of children with learning disabilities. J Learn Disab 1988;21:244-248.
51. Spaai GW, Ellermann HH, Reitsma P. Effects of segmented and whole word sound feedback on learning to read single words. J Educ Res 1991;84:204-213.
52. Barbetta PM, Herward THE, Heward WL. Effects of active student response during error correction on the acquisition maintenance and generalization of sight words by students with developmental disabilities. J Appl Behavr Anals 1993;26:111-119.
53. Heubusch JD, Lloyd JW. Corrective feedback in reading. J Behav Educ 1998;8:63-79.
54. Bus AG, Van IJzendoorn MH, Pelligrini AD. Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Rev Educ Res 1995;65:1-21.
55. Metin M. The examinations of teachers' attitude towards performance assessment with respect to the different variables. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:269-284.
56. Cepni S. Effects of computer supported instructional material (CSIM) in removing, students misconceptions about concepts: "Light, light source and seeing. " Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2009;1:51-83.