Bioelectromagnetic forward problem: Isolated source approach revis(it)ed

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 57, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3517-3535

  Stenroos, M ^a,b   Sarvas, J ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LOADS; COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; ELECTRICAL ACTIVITIES; FORWARD MODELING; FORWARD PROBLEM; GALERKIN; GALERKIN BEM; GENERIC BASIS; SPHERICAL GEOMETRIES; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS; SYMMETRIC BEM; WEIGHT FUNCTIONS;

BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THEORY; GALERKIN METHODS; GEOMETRY; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; SAILING VESSELS;

NEUROIMAGING;

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HEAD; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY;

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HEAD; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODELS, ANATOMIC;

EID: 84861114204     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/11/3517     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Acar Z A and Makeig S 2010 Neuroelectromagnetic forward head modeling toolbox J. Neurosci. Methods 190 25870
2. Barnard A C L, Duck I M and Lynn M S 1967 The application of electromagnetic theory to electrocardiology: I. Derivation of the integral equations Biophys. J. 7 44362
3. Baumann S B, Wozny D R, Kelly S K and Meno F M 1997 The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44 22023 (Pubitemid 27084209)
4. Brebbia C A and Dominguez J 1989 Boundary Elements: An Introductory Course (New York: McGraw-Hill)
5. Dannhauer M, Lanfer B, Wolters C H and Knösche T R 2011 Modeling of the human skull in EEG source analysis Hum. Brain Mapp. 32 138399
6. de Munck J C 1992 A linear discretization of the volume conductor boundary integral equation using analytically integrated elements IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39 9869 (Pubitemid 23121832)
7. Dunavant D A 1985 High degree efficient symmetrical Gaussian quadrature rules for the triangle Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 21 112948 (Pubitemid 15530458)
8. Ferguson A S, Zhang X and Stroink G 1994 A complete linear discretization for calculating the magnetic field using the boundary element method IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 41 45560 (Pubitemid 24213148)
9. Fischer G, Tilg B, Hanser F, Messnarz B and Wach P 2002 On modeling the Wilson terminal in the boundary and finite element method IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49 21724 (Pubitemid 34150998)
10. Gencer N G and Akalin-Acar Z 2005 Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging Phys. Med. Biol. 50 300722 (Pubitemid 40905182)
11. Geselowitz D B 1970 On the magnetic field generated outside an inhomogeneous volume conductor by internal current sources IEEE Trans. Mag. 6 3467
12. Graglia R D 1993 On the numerical integration of the linear shape functions times the 3-D Greens function or its gradient on a plane triangle IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 41 144855
13. Gramfort A, Papadopoulo T, Olivi E and Clerc M 2011 Forward field computation with OpenMEEG Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011 923703
14. Güllmar D, Haueisen J and Reichenbach J R 2010 Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution: a high-resolution whole head simulation study Neuroimage 51 14563
15. Hallez H, Staelens S and Lemahieu I 2009 Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis Phys. Med. Biol. 54 607993
16. Hämäläinen M S and Sarvas J 1989 Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36 16571 (Pubitemid 19061133)
17. Koikkalainen J and Lötjönen J 2004 Reconstruction of 3-D head geometry from digitized point sets: an evaluation study IEEE Trans. Inform. Technol. Biomed. 8 37786
18. Kybic J, Clerc M, Abboud T, Faugeras O, Keriven R and Papadopoulo T 2005a A common formalism for the integral formulations of the forward EEG problem IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 24 1228 (Pubitemid 40088552)
19. Kybic J, Clerc M, Faugeras O, Keriven R and Papadopoulo T 2005b Fast multipole acceleration of the MEG/EEG boundary element method Phys. Med. Biol. 50 4695710 (Pubitemid 41361526)
20. Lötjönen J 2003 Construction of patient-specific surface models from MR images: application to bioelectromagnetism Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 72 16778 (Pubitemid 36993856)
21. Meijs J W, Weier O W, Peters M J and van Oosterom A 1989 On the numerical accuracy of the boundary element method IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36 103849 (Pubitemid 20088830)
22. Mosher J C, Leahy R M and Lewis P S 1999 EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46 24559 (Pubitemid 29119981)
23. Rullmann M, Anwander A, Dannhauer M, Warfield S K, Duffy F H and Wolters C H 2009 EEG source analysis of epileptiform activity using a 1 mm anisotropic hexahedra finite element head model Neuroimage 44 399410
24. Sarvas J 1987 Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem Phys. Med. Biol. 32 1122 (Pubitemid 17039071)
25. Stenroos M 2009 The transfer matrix for epicardial potential in a piece-wise homogeneous thorax model: the boundary element formulation Phys. Med. Biol. 54 544355
26. Stenroos M and Haueisen J 2008 Boundary element computations in the forward and inverse problems of electrocardiography: comparison of collocation and Galerkin weightings IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55 212433
27. Stenroos M, Mäntynen V and Nenonen J 2007 A Matlab library for solving quasi-static volume conduction problems using the boundary element method Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 88 25663 (Pubitemid 350116296)
28. Stenroos M and Nenonen J 2012 On the accuracy of collocation and Galerkin BEM in the EEG/MEG forward problem Int. J. Bioelectromagnetism 14 2933 (Available at http://ijbem.k.hosei.ac.jp/2006-/volume14/number1/2012-v14-no1- pp29-33-Stenroos-Banff.pdf)