Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 50, Issue 13, 2005, Pages 3007-3022

  Gençer, Nevzat G ^a   Akalin Acar, Zeynep ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; BRAIN; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; MAGNETOELECTRIC EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TISSUE;

BRAIN TISSUES; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID (CSF); ISOLATED PROBLEM APPROACH (IPA); MULTI-LAYER MODELS;

IMAGING TECHNIQUES;

ARTICLE; BRAIN; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HEAD; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL;

EID: 21344467499     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/13/003     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Akalin-Acar Z and Gençer N G 2004 An advanced boundary element method (BEM) implementation for the forward problem of electromagnetic source imaging Phys. Med. Biol. 49 5011-28
2. Babiloni F, Carducci F, Cincotti F, Del Gratta C, Pizzella V, Romani G L, Rossini P M, Tecchio F and Babiloni C 2001 Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements Hum. Brain Mapp. 14 197-209
3. Baillet S, Mosher J C and Leahy R M 2001 Electromagnetic brain mapping IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 18 14-30
4. Barnard A C, Duck I M and Lynn M S 1967a The application of electromagnetic theory to electrocardiology: I. Derivation of the integral equations Biophys. J. 7 443-62
5. Barnard A C, Duck I M, Lynn M S and Timlake W P 1967b The application of electromagnetic theory to electrocardiology: II. Numerical solution of the integral equations Biophys. J. 7 463-91
6. Barr R C, Pilkington T C, Boineau J P and Spach M S 1966 Determining surface potentials from current dipoles, with application to electrocardiography IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 13 88-92
7. Benar C G and Gotman J 2002 Modeling of post-surgical brain and skull detects in the EEG inverse problem with the boundary element method Clin. Neurophysiol. 113 48-56
8. Budiman J and Buchanan D S 1993 An alternative to the biomagnetic forward problem in a realistically shaped head model, the weighted vertices IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 40 1048-53
9. Crouzeix A, Yvert B, Bertrand O and Pernier J 1999 An evaluation of dipole reconstruction accuracy with spherical and realistic head models in MEG Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 2176-88
10. Cuffin B N 1996 EEG localization accuracy improvements using realistically shaped head models IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43 299-303
11. Ferguson A S and Stroink G 1997 Factors affecting the accuracy of the boundary element method in the forward problem: I. calculating surface potentials IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44 1139-55
12. Frijns J H M, de Snoo S L and Schoonhoven R 2000 Improving the accuracy of the boundary element method by the use of second-order interpolation functions IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47 1336-46
13. Fuchs M, Drenckhahn R, Wischmann H A and Wagner M 1998 An improved boundary element method for realistic volume-conductor modeling IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 45 980-97
14. Geddes L A and Baker L E 1967 The specific resistance of biological material - a compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist Med. Biol. Eng. 5 271-93
15. Gençer N G and Acar C E 2004 Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity Phys. Med. Biol. 49 701-17
16. Gençer N G, Acar C E and Tanzer I O 2003 Forward problem solution of magnetic source imaging Magnetic Source Imaging of the Human Brain ed L Z Lu and L Kaufman (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)
17. Gençer N G and Tanzer I O 1999 Forward problem solution of electromagnetic source imaging using a new BEM formulation with high-order elements Phys. Med. Biol. 44 2275-87
18. Geselowitz D B 1967 On bioelectric potentials in an inhomogeneous volume conductor Biophys. J. 7 1-11
19. Hämäläinen M S and Sarvas J 1989 Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36 165-71
20. He B 1998 High-resolution source imaging of brain electrical activity IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 17 123-9
21. Kavanagh R N, Darcey T M, Lehmann D and Fender D H 1978 Evaluation of methods for three-dimensional localization of electrical sources in the human brain IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 25 421-9
22. Lynn M S and Timlake W P 1968 The use of multiple deflations in the numerical solution of singular systems of equations, with applications to potential theory SIAM J. Num. Anal. 5 303-22
23. Meijs J W H, Weier O W, Peters M J and Van Oosterom A 1989 On the numerical accuracy of the boundary element method IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36 1038-49
24. Michel C M, Thut G, Morand S, Khateb A, Pegna A J, de Peralta R G, Gonzales S, Seeck M and Landis T 2001 Electric source imaging of human brain functions Brain Res. Rev. 36 108-18
25. Ramon C, Schimpf P, Haueisen J, Holmes M and Ishimaru A 2004 Role of soft bone, CSF and gray matter in EEG simulations Brain Topogr. 16 245-8
26. Roth B J, Balish M, Gorbach A and Sato S 1993 How well does a three-sphere model predict positions of dipoles in a realistically shaped head? Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 87 175-84
27. van Burik M J and Peters M J 2000 Estimation of the electric conductivity from scalp measurements: feasibility and application to source localization Clin. Neurophysiol. 111 1514-21