Minimally invasive heart valve surgery: How and why in 2012

Current Cardiology Reports

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 171-179

  Suri, Rakesh M ^a   Thalji, Nassir M ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Aortic valve; Heart valve surgery; Minimally invasive; Mitral valve; Robot assisted; Surgical procedure

Indexed keywords

AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART VALVE SURGERY; HUMAN; INCISION; INTENSIVE CARE; LEARNING CURVE; LENGTH OF STAY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY; MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY; MITRAL VALVE PROLAPSE; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; MITRAL VALVE REPAIR; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; PROGNOSIS; ROBOTICS; STERNOTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TRANSLUMINAL VALVULOPLASTY;

AORTIC VALVE; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MITRAL VALVE; STERNOTOMY; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84861098421     PISSN: 15233782     EISSN: 15343170     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11886-011-0244-8     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Adams DH, Carabello BA, Castillo J. Mitral Valve Regurgitation. In: Fuster V, Walsh RA, Harrington RA, editors. Hurst's The Heart 13th ed, Chapter 77. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011.
2. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, et al. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368:1005-11. (Pubitemid 44353666)
3. Carabello BA, Nakano K, Corin W, et al. Left ventricular function in experimental volume overload hypertrophy. Am J Physiol. 1989;256:H974-81.
4. Enriquez-Sarano M, Avierinos JF, Messika-Zeitoun D, et al. Quantitative determinants of the outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:875-83. (Pubitemid 40300296)
5. Savage EB, Ferguson Jr. TB, DiSesa VJ. Use of mitral valve repair: analysis of contemporary United States experience reported to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:820-5. (Pubitemid 36298349)
6. Enriquez-Sarano M, Sundt III TM. Early surgery is recommended for mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2010;121:804-11. discussion 12.
7. Bolling SF, Li S, O'Brien SM, et al. Predictors of mitral valve repair: clinical and surgeon factors. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1904-11.
8. Suri RM, Burkhart HM, Rehfeldt KH, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair for all categories of leaflet prolapse: improving patient appeal and advancing standard of care. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86:838-44.
9. Suri RM, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, et al. Recurrent mitral regurgitation after repair: should the mitral valve be re-repaired? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:1390-7. (Pubitemid 44820197)
10. Suri RM, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, et al. Survival advantage and improved durability of mitral repair for leaflet prolapse subsets in the current era. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:819-26.
11. Suri RM, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, et al. Recovery of left ventricular function after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation caused by leaflet prolapse. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:1071-6.
12. Suri RM, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, et al. Determinants of early decline in ejection fraction after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:442-7.
13. Enriquez-Sarano M, Tajik AJ, Schaff HV, et al. Echocardiographic prediction of survival after surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 1994;90:830-7. (Pubitemid 24242752)
14. Tribouilloy CM, Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff HV, et al. Impact of preoperative symptoms on survival after surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation: rationale for optimizing surgical indications. Circulation. 1999;99:400-5. (Pubitemid 29051266)
15. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:e1-148.
16. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1597-607.
17. Alfieri O, Maisano F, De Bonis M, et al. The double-orifice technique in mitral valve repair: a simple solution for complex problems. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:674-81. (Pubitemid 35470109)
18. Fann JI, St Goar FG, J Komtebedde, et al. Beating heart catheterbased edge-to-edge mitral valve procedure in a porcine model: efficacy and healing response. Circulation. 2004;110:988-93. (Pubitemid 39128624)
19. Feldman T, Foster E, Glower DD, et al. Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1395-406.
20. McClure RS, Cohn LH, Wiegerinck E, et al. Early and late outcomes in minimally invasive mitral valve repair: an elevenyear experience in 707 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:70-5.
21. Cohn LH, Adams DH, Couper GS, et al. Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann Surg. 1997;226:421-6. discussion 7-8.
22. Navia JL, Cosgrove 3rd DM. Minimally invasive mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:1542-4. (Pubitemid 26383580)
23. Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Le Bret E, et al. Open heart operation under videosurgery and minithoracotomy. First case (mitral valvuloplasty) operated with success. C R Acad Sci III. 1996;319:219-23. (Pubitemid 26116849)
24. Falk V, Walther T, Autschbach R, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive solo mitral valve operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:470-1. (Pubitemid 28093766)
25. Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Aupecle B, et al. Computer assisted open heart surgery. First case operated on with success. C R Acad Sci III. 1998;321:437-42. (Pubitemid 28271579)
26. Chitwood Jr. WR, Nifong LW, Elbeery JE, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair: trapezoidal resection and prosthetic annuloplasty with the da vinci surgical system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:1171-2.
27. Chitwood Jr. WR. Current status of endoscopic and robotic mitral valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:S2248-53. (Pubitemid 40804242)
28. Chitwood Jr. WR, Rodriguez E, Chu MW, et al. Robotic mitral valve repairs in 300 patients: a single-center experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:436-41.
29. Murphy DA, Miller JS, Langford DA, Snyder AB. Endoscopic robotic mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:776-81. (Pubitemid 44415878)
30. Schmitto JD, Mokashi SA, Cohn LH. Minimally-invasive valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:455-62.
31. Suri RM, Burkhart HM, Daly RC, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair for all prolapse subsets using techniques identical to open valvuloplasty: Establishing the benchmark against which percutaneous interventions should be judged. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:970-9.
32. Gammie JS, Zhao Y, Peterson ED, et al. J. Maxwell Chamberlain Memorial Paper for adult cardiac surgery. Less-invasive mitral valve operations: trends and outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1401-8. 10 e1 discussion 8-10.
33. Svensson LG, Atik FA, Cosgrove DM, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional mitral valve surgery: a propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:926-32. e1-2.
34. Suri RM, Schaff HV, Meyer SR, Hargrove 3rd WC. Thoracoscopic versus open mitral valve repair: a propensity score analysis of early outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1185-90.
35. Modi P, Hassan A, Chitwood Jr. WR. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34:943-52.
36. Grossi EA, Galloway AC, Ribakove GH, et al. Minimally invasive port access surgery reduces operative morbidity for valve replacement in the elderly. Heart Surg Forum. 1999;2:212-5.
37. Santana O, Reyna J, Grana R, et al. Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery versus standard sternotomy in obese patients undergoing isolated valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:406-10.
38. Grossi EA, Galloway AC, Ribakove GH, et al. Impact of minimally invasive valvular heart surgery: a case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:807-10. (Pubitemid 32210380)
39. Murphy GJ, Reeves BC, Rogers CA, et al. Increased mortality, postoperative morbidity, and cost after red blood cell transfusion in patients having cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2007;116:2544-52. (Pubitemid 350179219)
40. Stokes ME, Ye X, Shah M, et al. Impact of bleeding-related complications and/or blood product transfusions on hospital costs in inpatient surgical patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:135.
41. Mihaljevic T, Cohn LH, Unic D, et al. One thousand minimally invasive valve operations: early and late results. Ann Surg. 2004;240:529-34. (Pubitemid 39121347)
42. Lamelas J, Sarria A, Santana O, et al. Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery versus median sternotomy in patients age 75 years or greater. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:79-84.
43. Schmitto JD, Mohr FW, Cohn LH. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: how does this perform in high-risk patients? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011;26:118-22.
44. Casselman FP, Van Slycke S, Dom H, et al. Endoscopic mitral valve repair: feasible, reproducible, and durable. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:273-82. (Pubitemid 36228305)
45. Vleissis AA, Bolling SF. Mini-reoperative mitral valve surgery. J Card Surg. 1998;13:468-70. (Pubitemid 29497961)
46. Chitwood Jr. WR, Wixon CL, Elbeery JR, et al. Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114:773-80. discussion 80-2.
47. Cosgrove 3rd DM, Sabik JF, Navia JL. Minimally invasive valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:1535-8. discussion 8-9.
48. Iribarne A, Easterwood R, Russo MJ, et al. A minimally invasive approach is more cost-effective than a traditional sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(6):1507-14.
49. Felger JE, Nifong LW, Chitwood Jr. WR. The evolution of and early experience with robot-assisted mitral valve surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;12:58-63. (Pubitemid 34165137)
50. Mihaljevic T, Jarrett CM, Gillinov AM, et al. Robotic repair of posterior mitral valve prolapse versus conventional approaches: potential realized. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:72-80. e1-4.
51. Cheng W, Fontana GP, De Robertis MA, et al. Is robotic mitral valve repair a reproducible approach? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:628-33.
52. Freeman RV, Otto CM. Aortic Valve Disease. In: Fuster V, Walsh RA, Harrington RA, editors. Hurst's The Heart 13th ed, Chapter 76. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011.
53. Shekar PS, Cohn LH. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery. In: Cohn LH, editor. Cardiac Surgery in the Adult 3 rd ed, Chapter 39. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008. p. 957-64.
54. Cosgrove 3rd DM, Sabik JF. Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:596-7. (Pubitemid 26259724)
55. Gillinov AM, Banbury MK, Cosgrove DM. Hemisternotomy approach for aortic and mitral valve surgery. J Card Surg. 2000;15:15-20. (Pubitemid 32436503)
56. Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, Schaff HV. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:670-9.
57. Byrne JG, Aranki SF, Couper GS, et al. Reoperative aortic valve replacement: partial upper hemisternotomy versus conventional full sternotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:991-7.
58. ElBardissi AW, Shekar P, Couper GS, Cohn LH. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in octogenarian, high-risk, transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:328-35.
59. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2187-98.
60. Flameng W, Herregods MC, Hermans H, et al. Effect of sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis on intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(6):1453-7.
61. Martens S, Sadowski J, Eckstein FS, et al. Clinical experience with the ATS 3f Enable(R) Sutureless Bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:749-55.
62. Suri RM, Burkhart HM, Schaff HV. Robot-assisted aortic valve replacement using a novel sutureless bovine pericardial prosthesis: proof of concept as an alternative to percutaneous implantation. Innovations. 2010;5:419-23.
63. Bach DS, Awais M, Gurm HS, Kohnstamm S. Failure of guideline adherence for intervention in patients with severe mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:860-5.
64. Toledano K, Rudski LG, Huynh T, et al. Mitral regurgitation: determinants of referral for cardiac surgery by Canadian cardiologists. Can J Cardiol. 2007;23:209-14. (Pubitemid 46736376)
65. Lee TH, Hillis LD, Nabel EG. CABG vs. stenting-clinical implications of the SYNTAX trial. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:e10.
66. Michelena HI, Abel MD, Suri RM, et al. Intraoperative echocardiography in valvular heart disease: an evidence-based appraisal. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:646-55.
67. Rehfeldt KH, Mauermann WJ, Burkhart HM, Suri RM. Robotassisted mitral valve repair. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25:721-30.