Elective single embryo transfer and cumulative pregnancy rate: Five-year experience in a Southern European Country

Gynecological Endocrinology

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 425-428

  Rodríguez Barredo, Dalia Beatriz ^a   Tur Padro, Rosa ^a   Mancini, Fulvia ^a   Parriego García, Mónica ^a   Rodríguez García, Ignacio ^a   Coroleu Lletget, Buenaventura ^a   Barri Rague, Pedro Nolasc ^a  

^a INSTITUT UNIVERSITARI DEXEUS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cumulative live birth rate; Frozen embryo transfer; Single embryo transfer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE EMBRYO TRANSFER; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FOLLOW UP; FREEZE THAWING; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; LIVE BIRTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TWIN PREGNANCY;

ADULT; EUROPE; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFERTILITY; MALE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER; SPAIN; SPERM INJECTIONS, INTRACYTOPLASMIC; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE;

EID: 84861066732     PISSN: 09513590     EISSN: 14730766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2011.633662     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Spanish National Statistics Institute (Instituto Nacional de Estadistica. INE) http://www.ine.es/inebase.
2. Scholz T, Bartholomaus S, Grimmer I, Kentenich H, Obladen M. Problems of multiple births after ART: Medical, psychological, social and financial aspects. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2932-2937.
3. Tur R, Barri PN, Coroleu B, Buxaderas R, Martinez F, Balasch J. Risk factors for high-order multiple implantation after ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins: Evidence from a large series of 1878 consecutive pregnancies in a single centre. Hum Reprod 2001;16:2124-2129.
4. de Mouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Ferraretti AP, Korsak V, Kupka M, et al. European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1851-1862.
5. Templeton A, Morris JK. Reducing the risk of multiple births by transfer of two embryos after in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 1998;339:573-577. (Pubitemid 28385653)
6. Vilska S, Tiitinen A, Hyden-Granskog C, Hovatta O. Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2392-2395. (Pubitemid 29425437)
7. Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, De Neubourg D, Valkenburg M, Van de Meerssche M, Ryckaert G, Eestermans W, Gerris J. Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2345-2349. (Pubitemid 29425427)
8. De Sutter P, Der Elst JV, Coetsier T, Dhont M. Single embryo transfer and multiple pregnancy rate reduction in IVF/ICSI: A 5 year appraisal. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;6:552-556.
9. Tiitinen A, Gissler M. Effect of in vitro fertilization practices on multiple pregnancy rates in Finland. Fertil Steril 2004;82:1689-1690. (Pubitemid 39611406)
10. Baruffi RL, Mauri AL, Petersen CG, et al. Single-embryo transfer reduces clinical pregnancy rates and live births in fresh IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles: A meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2009;23:7-36.
11. Gerris J, De Neubourg D, De Sutter P, Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, Vercruyssen M. Cryopreservation as a tool to reduce multiple birth. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;7:286-294. (Pubitemid 37259277)
12. Barri PN. Multiple pregnancies: A plea for informed caution. Hum Reprod Update 2005;11:1-2. (Pubitemid 40201971)
13. Clua E, Tur R, Coroleu B, Boada M, Barri PN, Veiga A. Analysis of factors associated with multiple pregnancy in an oocyte donation programme. Reprod Biomed Online 2010;21:694-699.
14. Veiga A, Calderon G, Barri PN, Coroleu B. Pregnancy after the replacement of a frozen-thawed embryo with less than 50% intact blastomeres. Hum Reprod 1987;2:321-323. (Pubitemid 17148722)
15. Martinez F, Boada M, Coroleu B, Clua E, Parera N, Rodriguez I, Barri PN. A prospective trial comparing oocyte donor ovarian response and recipient pregnancy rates between suppression with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) alone and dual suppression with a contraceptive vaginal ring and GnRH. Hum Reprod 2006;21:2121-2125. (Pubitemid 44288092)
16. Gerris J, De Neubourg D, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Van de Meerssche M, Valkenburg M. Prevention of twin pregnancy after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2581-2587. (Pubitemid 29473933)
17. Martikainen H, Tiitinen A, Tomas C, Tapanainen J, Orava M, Tuomivaara L, Vilska S, et al. Finnish ET Study Group. One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: A randomized study. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1900-1903. (Pubitemid 32916219)
18. Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, Jablonowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell A, Bergh C. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2392-2402. (Pubitemid 40485991)
19. van Montfoort AP, Fiddelers AA, Janssen JM, Derhaag JG, Dirksen CD, Dunselman GA, Land JA, et al. In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: A randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2006;21:338-343. (Pubitemid 43159904)
20. Lukassen HG, Braat DD, Wetzels AM, Zielhuis GA, Adang EM, Scheenjes E, Kremer JA. Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: A randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2005;20:702-708. (Pubitemid 40425497)
21. Moustafa MK, Sheded SA, El Aziz Mousta MA. Elective single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer in assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17:82-87.
22. ESHRE Campus Course Report. Prevention of twin pregnancies following IVF/ICSI by single embryo transfer. Human Reprod 2001;16:790-800.
23. Barri PN, Tur R, Coroeu B, Boada M, Veiga A. How many embryos to replace? In: Ben Rafael Z, Diedrich K, Dudenhausen JW, Mettler L, Schneider HPG, Shoham Z, Oren E, Editors. Controversies in Obstetrics Gynecology and Infertility. Berlin: International Proceedings Division; 2003. pp 335-340.
24. Fauque P, Jouannet P, Davy C, et al. Cumulative results including obstetrical and neonatal outcome of fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in elective single versus double fresh embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 2009;94:927-35.
25. Nyboe Andersen A, Gianaroli L, Nygren KG. European IVF-monitoring programme; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2000. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2004;19:490-503.
26. Cabello Y, Gomez-Palomares JL, Castilla JA, Hernandez J, Marqueta J, Pareja A, Luceno F, et al. Impact of the Spanish Fertility Society guidelines on the number of embryos to transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2010;21:667-675.
27. Ombelet W, Martens G, De Sutter P, Gerris J, Bosmans E, Ruyssinck G, Defoort P, et al. Perinatal outcome of 12,021 singleton and 3108 twin births after non-IVF-assisted reproduction: A cohort study. Hum Reprod 2006;21:1025-1032.
28. Ryan GL, Zhang SH, Dokras A, Syrop CH, Van Voorhis BJ. The desire of infertile patients for multiple births. Fertil Steril 2004;81:500-504. (Pubitemid 38376098)
29. Gelbaya TA, Tsoumpou I, Nardo LG. The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2010;94:936-945.
30. van Peperstraten A, Nelen W, Grol R, Zielhuis G, Adang E, Stalmeier P, Hermens R, Kremer J. The effect of a multifaceted empowerment strategy on decision making about the number of embryos transferred in in vitro fertilisation: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010; 341:2501.