Exploring dynamics in mood regulation-mixture latent markov modeling of ambulatory assessment data

Psychosomatic Medicine

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 366-376

  Crayen, Claudia ^a   Eid, Michael ^a   Lischetzke, Tanja ^a   Courvoisier, Delphine S ^b   Vermunt, Jeroen K ^c  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^c TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ambulatory assessment; experience sampling method; hierarchical latent Markov model; latent class analysis; mixture distribution; mood regulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOSOMATICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNIVERSITY STUDENT;

EID: 84861052164     PISSN: 00333174     EISSN: 15347796     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31825474cb     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Walls TA, Höppner BB, Goodwin MS. Statistical issues in intensive longitudinal data analysis. In: Stone A, Shiffman S, Atienza A, Nebelling L, editors. The Science of Real-time Data Capture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007:338-60.
2. Molenaar PCM, Sinclair KO, Rovine MJ, Ram N, Corneal SE. Analyzing developmental processes on an individual level using non-stationary time series modeling. Dev Psychol 2009;45:260-71.
3. Shumway RH, Stoffer DS. Time Series Analysis and Its Applications. With R Examples. New York, NY: Springer; 2011.
4. Reicherts M, Pihet S. Job newcomers coping with stressful situations: A micro-analysis of adequate coping and well-being. Swiss J Psychol 2000;59:303-16.
5. Larsen RJ. The stability of mood variability: A spectral analytic approach to daily mood assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987;52:1195-204.
6. Nesselroade JR, Molenaar PCM. Applying dynamic factor analysis in behavioral and social science research. In: Kaplan D, editor. The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004:335-44.
7. Sbarra DA, Ferrer E. The structure and process of emotional experience following nonmarital relationship dissolution: Dynamic factor analyses of love, anger, and sadness. Emotion 2006;6:224-38.
8. Singer J,Willett J.Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis. Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003.
9. Walls TA, Jung H, Schwartz J. Multilevel models and intensive longitudinal data. In: Walls TA, Schafer JS, editors. Models for Intensive Longitudinal Data. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006:3-37.
10. Röcke C, Li S-C, Smith J. Intraindividual variability in positive and negative affect over 45 days: Do older adults fluctuate less than young adults? Psychol Aging 2009;24:863-78.
11. Eid M, Courvoisier D, Lischetzke T. Structural equation modeling. In: Mehl MR, Conner TS, editors. Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life. New York, NY: Guilford; 2012:384-406.
12. Vermunt JK, Tran B, Magidson J. Latent class models in longitudinal research. In: Menard S, editor. Handbook of Longitudinal Research: Design, Measurement and Analysis. Burlington, MA: Elsevier; 2008: 373-85.
13. Wiggins LM. Panel Analysis. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier; 1973.
14. Dias JG, Vermunt JK, Ramos S. Mixture hidden Markov models in finance research. In: Fink A, Lausen B, Seidel W, Ultsch A, editors. Advances in Data Analysis, Data Handling and Business Intelligence. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2010:451-9.
15. Parkinson B, Totterdell P, Briner RB, Reynolds S. ChangingMoods. New York, NY: Addison, Wesley, Longman; 1996.
16. Frijda NH. Varieties of affect: Emotions and episodes, moods, sentiments. In: Ekman P, Davidson R, editors. The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1994:59-67.
17. Morris WN. Mood: The Frame of Mind. New York, NY: Springer; 1989.
18. Schimmack U, Grob A. Dimensional models of core affect: A quantitative comparison by means of structural equation modeling. Eur J Pers 2000; 14:325-45.
19. Matthews G, Jones DM, Chamberlain AG. Refining the measurement of mood: The UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist. Br J Psychol 1990; 81:17-42.
20. Steyer R, Schwenkmezger P, Notz P, Eid M. Testtheoretische analysen des mehrdimensionalen befindlichkeitsfragebogens (MDBF). Diagnostica 1994;40:320-8.
21. Eid M, Diener E. Intraindividual variability in affect: Reliability, validity, and personality correlates. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999;76:662-76.
22. Eid M, Notz P, Steyer R, Schwenkmezger P. Validating scales for the assessment of mood level and variability by latent state-trait analyses. Pers Individ Dif 1994;16:63-76.
23. Josephson BR, Singer JA, Salovey P. Mood regulation and memory: Repairing sad moods with happy memories. Cognit Emot 1996;10: 437-44.
24. Larsen RJ. Toward a science of mood regulation. Psychol Inq 2000; 11:129-41.
25. Showers CJ, Kling KC. Organization of self-knowledge: Implications for recovery from sad mood. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996;70:578-90.
26. Bryant FB. A four-factor model of perceived control: Avoiding, coping, obtaining and savoring. J Pers 1989;57:773-97.
27. Lischetzke T, Eid M. Why are extraverts happier than introverts? Exploring the role of mood regulation processes. J Pers 2006;74:1127-62.
28. Salovey P, Mayer JD, Goldman SL, Turvey C, Palfai TP. Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. In: Pennebaker JW, editor. Emotion, Disclosure, and Health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1995:125-54.
29. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling 2002;9:233-55.
30. Meredith W. Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika 1993;58:525-43.
31. Van de Pol F, Langeheine R. Mixed Markov latent class models. Sociol Methodol Oxford: Blackwell;1990:213-47.
32. Eid M. Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis for polytomous item responses: Model definition and model selection on the basis of stochastic measurement theory. Methods Psychol Res 1996;1:65-85.
33. Eid M. Latent-class models for analyzing variability and change. In: Ong AD, vanDulmenMHM, editors. Oxford Handbook ofMethods in Positive Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007:591-607.
34. Rijmen F, Vansteelandt K, de Boeck P. Latent class models for diary method data: Parameter estimation by local computations. Psychometrika 2008;73:167-82.
35. Steyer R, Schwenkmezger P, Notz P, EidM. MDBF Y Mehrdimensionaler Befindlichkeitsfragebogen. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe; 1997.
36. Piasecki TM, Hufford MR, Solhan M, Trull TJ. Assessing clients in their natural environments with electronic diaries: Rationale, benefits, limitations, and barriers. Psychol Assess 2007;19:25-43.
37. Lischetzke T, Eid M. Is attention to feelings beneficial or detrimental to affective well-being? Mood regulation as a moderator variable. Emotion 2003;3:361-77.
38. Vermunt JK, Magidson J. LG-Syntax User's Guide: Manual for Latent GOLD 4.5 Syntax Module. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc.; 2008.
39. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna; 2010. Available at: Http://www.R-project.org/.
40. Sturtz S, Ligges U, Gelman A. R2WinBUGS: A package for running WinBUGS from R. J Stat Softw 2005;12:1-16. Accessed May 3, 2011.
41. Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D. WinBUGSVa Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comput 2000;10:325-37.
42. Visser I, Speekenbrink M. depmixS4: An R package for hidden Markov models. J Stat Software 2010;36:1-21.
43. Rost J. Mixed and latent Markov models as item response models. MPR Online 2002;7:53-72.
44. Eid M, Langeheine R, Diener E. Comparing typological structures across cultures by latent class analysis: A primer. J Cross Cult Psychol 2003; 34:195-210.
45. Read TRC, Cressie NAC. Goodness-of-fit Statistics for Discrete Multivariate Data. New York, NY: Springer; 1988.
46. Agresti A, Yang M. An empirical investigation of some effects of sparseness in contingency tables. Comput Stat Data Anal 1986;5:9-21.
47. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 1978;6:461-4.
48. Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthen B. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling. A Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Modeling 2007;14:535-69.
49. Li F, Cohen AS, Kim S-H, Cho S-J. Model selection methods for mixture dichotomous IRT models. Appl Psychol Meas 2009;33:353-73.
50. Dias JG. Model selection criteria for model-based clustering of categorical time series data: A Monte-Carlo study. In: Decker R, Lenz HJ, editors. Advances in Data Analysis. Proc. 30th Annual conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2007:23-30.
51. Bozdogan H. Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika 1987; 52:345-70.
52. Langeheine R, Van de Pol F. Latent Markov chains. In: Hagenaars JA, McCutcheon AL, editors. Applied Latent Class Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2002:304-41.
53. Courvoisier D, Eid M, Nussbeck FW. Mixture distribution state-trait models. Psychol Methods 2007;12:80-104.
54. Vermunt JK. Longitudinal research using mixture models. In: Van Montfort K, Oud JHL, Satorra A, editors. Longitudinal Research With Latent Variables. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2010:119-52.
55. Böckenholt U. A latentMarkov model for the analysis of longitudinal data collected in continuous time: States, durations, and transitions. Psychol Methods 2005;10:65-83.