First danish single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy: Impact of surgical margins on biochemical outcome

Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 172-179

  Vrang, Marie Louise ^a   Roder, Martin Andreas ^a   Vainer, Ben ^b   Christensen, Ib Jarle ^a   Gruschy, Lisa ^a   Brasso, Klaus ^a   Iversen, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b Urology Research Unit   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Biochemical recurrence; Prostate cancer; Radical retropubic prostatectomy; Surgical margins

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER SURVIVAL; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME;

AGED; DENMARK; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84861018287     PISSN: 00365599     EISSN: 16512065     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00365599.2011.644860     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Brasso K, Ingeholm P, Iversen P. [Radical prostatectomy. The first 50 consecutive patients undergoing surgery at Rigshospitalet]. Ugeskr Laeger 2001; 163: 5669-73. (Pubitemid 33703758)
2. Borre M, Iversen P, Bendixen A, Iversen MG. Kehlet H.[Organisation and early outcome after radical prostatectomy in Denmark 2004-2007]. Ugeskr Laeger 2008; 170: 2545-9.
3. Brasso K, Ingimarsdottir IJ, Thomassen L, Friis S. Iversen P. [Prostate cancer in Denmark 1943-2002]. Ugeskr Laeger 2007; 169: 129-32. (Pubitemid 46120791)
4. Fleshner NE, Evans A, Chadwick K, Lawrentschuk N, Zlotta A. Clinical significance of the positive surgical margin based upon location, grade, and stage. Urol Oncol 2010; 28: 197-204.
5. Blute ML, Bostwick DG, Bergstralh EJ, SlezakJM,MartinSK, Amling CL, et al. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. Urology 1997; 50: 733-9. (Pubitemid 27494995)
6. Eastham JA, Kuroiwa K, Ohori M, Serio AM, Gorbonos A, Maru N, et al. Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 2007; 70: 965-9. (Pubitemid 350192610)
7. Emerson RE, Koch MO, Jones TD, Daggy JK, Juliar BE, Cheng L. The influence of extent of surgical margin positivity on prostate specific antigen recurrence. J Clin Pathol 2005; 58: 1028-32. (Pubitemid 41416050)
8. Karakiewicz PI, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Cagiannos I, Stricker PD, Klein E, et al. Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients. Urology 2005; 66: 1245-50. (Pubitemid 41797299)
9. Marks RA, Koch MO, Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R, Juliar BE, Cheng L. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens. Hum Pathol 2007; 38: 1207-11. (Pubitemid 47058159)
10. Ohori M, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Goto Y, Scardino PT. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 1995; 154: 1818-24.
11. Orvieto MA, Alsikafi NF, Shalhav AL, Laven BA, Steinberg GD, Zagaja GP, et al. Impact of surgical margin status on long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2006; 98: 1199-203. (Pubitemid 44721224)
12. Pettus JA, Weight CJ, Thompson CJ, Middleton RG, Stephenson RA. Biochemical failure in men following radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact of surgical margin status and location. J Urol 2004; 172: 129-32. (Pubitemid 41615053)
13. Pfitzenmaier J, Pahernik S, Tremmel T, Haferkamp A, Buse S, Hohenfellner M. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression? BJU Int 2008; 102: 1413-18.
14. Salomon L, Anastasiadis AG, Antiphon P, Levrel O, Saint F, de la Taille A, et al. Prognostic consequences of the location of positive surgical margins in organ-confined prostate cancer. Urol Int 2003; 70: 291-6. (Pubitemid 36566260)
15. Sofer M, Hamilton-Nelson KL, Civantos F, Soloway MS. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression. J Urol 2002; 167: 2453-6. (Pubitemid 34533144)
16. Stephenson AJ, Wood DP, Kattan MW, Klein EA, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, et al. Location, extent and number of positive surgical margins do not improve accuracy of predicting prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2009; 182: 1357-63.
17. Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Wheeler T, Maru N, et al. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 2008; 179: S47-51. (Pubitemid 351483915)
18. Vis AN, Schroder FH, van der Kwast TH. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 258-65. (Pubitemid 44038060)
19. van Oort IM, Bruins HM, Kiemeney LA, Knipscheer BC, Witjes JA, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA. The length of positive surgical margins correlates with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Histopathology 2010; 56: 464-71.
20. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 2002.
21. Røder M, Berg K, Gruschy L, Brasso K, Iversen P. First Danish Single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy: biochemical outcome in 1200 consecutive patients. Prostate Cancer 2011; 2011: 1-5.
22. Carlsson S, Aus G, Bergdahl S, Khatami A, Lodding P, Stranne J, et al. The excess burden of side-effects from treatment in men allocated to screening for prostate cancer. The Goteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial. Eur J Cancer 2011; 47: 545-53.
23. Klein EA, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Pontes JE, et al. Surgeon experience is strongly associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for all preoperative risk categories. J Urol 2008; 179: 2212-16.
24. Bianco FJ Jr, Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Klein EA, Eastham JA, Pontes JE, et al. Variations among experienced surgeons in cancer control after open radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2010; 183: 977-82.
25. Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Scardino PT. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 2002; 167: 528-34. (Pubitemid 34074521)
26. Pierorazio PM, Ross AE, Schaeffer EM, Epstein JI, Han M, Walsh PC, et al. A contemporary analysis of outcomes of adenocarcinoma of the prostate with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2011; 185: 1691-7.