A Bayesian approach to phylogeographic clustering

Interface Focus

Volumn 1, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 909-921

  Manolopoulou, Ioanna ^a   Legarreta, Lorenza ^b,f   Emerson, Brent C ^c   Brooks, Steve ^d   Tavaré, Simon ^e  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTO DE PRODUCTOS NATURALES Y AGROBIOLOGÍA   (Spain)

^d Select Statistics   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^f NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coalescent; Island model; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Migration; Reversible jump; Subdivided population

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860902289     PISSN: 20428898     EISSN: 20428901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0054     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Templeton, A. 2008 Nested clade analysis: an extensively validated method for strong phylogeographic inference. Mol. Ecol. 17, 1877-1880. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X. 2008.03731.x)
2. Lemey, P., Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. & Suchard, M. 2009 Bayesian phylogeography finds its roots. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000520. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi. 1000520)
3. Minin, V., Bloomquist, E. & Suchard, M. 2008 Smooth skyride through a rough skyline: Bayesian coalescentbased inference of population dynamics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1459-1471. (doi:10.1093/molbev/msn090)
4. Hey, J. 2010 Isolation with migration models for more than two populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 905-920. (doi:10.1093/molbev/msp296)
5. Beerli, P. & Palczewski, M. 2010 Unified framework to evaluate panmixia and migration direction among multiple sampling locations. Genetics 185, 313-326. (doi:10. 1534/genetics.109.112532)
6. Sanmartín, I., Anderson, C. L., Alarcon, M., Ronquist, F. & Aldasoro, J. J. 2010 Bayesian island biogeography in a continental setting: the rand flora case. Biol. Lett. 6, 703-707. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0095)
7. Beaumont, M. & Panchal, M. 2008 On the validity of nested clade phylogeographical analysis. Mol. Ecol. 17, 2563-2565. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03786.x)
8. Beaumont, M. et al. 2010 In defence of model-based inference in phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 19, 436-446. (doi:10. 1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04515.x)
9. Knowles, L. & Rausher, M. 2008 Why does a method that fails continue to be used? Evolution 62, 2713-2717. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00481.x)
10. Templeton, A. 2009 Why does a method that fails continue to be used: the answer. Evolution 63, 807-812. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00600.x)
11. Templeton, A. 2010 Coherent and incoherent inference in phylogeography and human evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 6376-6381. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 0910647107)
12. Bloomquist, E., Lemey, P. & Suchard, M. 2010 Three roads diverged? Routes to phylogeographic inference. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 626-632. (doi:10.1016/j.tree. 2010.08.010)
13. Manolopoulou, I. 2009 A Bayesian approach to nested clade analysis. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
14. Balloux, F., Handley, L., Jombart, T., Liu, H. & Manica, A. 2009 Climate shaped the worldwide distribution of human mitochondrial DNA sequence variation. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 3447-3455. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0752)
15. Richardson, S. & Green, P. 1997 On Bayesian analysis of mixtures with an unknown number of components. J. R. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 59, 731-792. (doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00095)
16. Swofford, D. L., Olsen, G. J., Waddell, P. J. & Hillis, D. M. 1996 Phylogenetic inference. In Molecular systematics (eds D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz & B. K. Mable), pp. 407-514, 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
17. Templeton, A. & Sing, C. 1993 A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. IV. Nested analyses with cladogram uncertainty and recombination. Genetics 134, 659-669.
18. Templeton, A. 1998 Nested clade analysis of phylogeographic data: testing hypotheses about gene flow and population history. Mol. Ecol. 7, 381-397. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00308.x)
19. Avise, J. 2000 Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Latter, B. 1973 The island model of population differentiation: a general solution. Genetics 73, 147-157.
21. De Iorio, M. & Griffiths, R. 2004 Importance sampling on coalescent histories. II. Subdivided population models. Adv. Appl. Probab. 36, 434-454. (doi:10.1239/aap/1086957580)
22. Emerson, B. & Hewitt, G. 2005 Phylogeography. Curr. Biol. 15, 367-371. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.016)
23. Hewitt, G. 2000 The genetic legacy of the quaternary ice ages. Nature 405, 907-913. (doi:10.1038/35016000)
24. Sankoff, D. 1975 Minimal mutation trees of sequences. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 28, 35-42. (doi:10.1137/0128004)
25. Gilks, W., Richardson, S. & Spiegelhalter, D. 1995 Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
26. Huelsenbeck, J. & Ronquist, F. 2001 MrBayes: Bayesian inference on phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754-755. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754)
27. Handley, L., Manica, A., Goudet, J. & Balloux, F. 2007 Going the distance: human population genetics in a clinal world. Trends Genet. 23, 432-439. (doi:10.1016/j. tig.2007.07.002)
28. Drummond, A., Rambaut, A., Shapiro, B. & Pybus, O. 2005 Bayesian coalescent inference of past population dynamics from molecular sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1185-1192. (doi:10.1093/molbev/msi103)
29. Geyer, C. 1992 Practical Markov chain Monte Carlo. Statist. Sci. 7, 473-483. (doi:10.1214/ss/1177011137)
30. Geyer, C. 1991 Markov chain Monte Carlo maximum likelihood. In Computing science and statistics: proceedings of 23rd Symposium on the Interface (ed. E. M. Keramidas), pp. 156-163. Fairfax Station, VA: Interface Foundation.