The Effect of Maximum Bite Force, Implant Number, and Attachment Type on Marginal Bone Loss around Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures: A Retrospective Study

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 14, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2012, Pages

  Geckili, Onur ^a   Mumcu, Emre ^a   Bilhan, Hakan ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Dental implant; Marginal bone loss; Maximum bite force; Overdenture

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLETE LOWER DENTURE; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MASTICATION; MIDDLE AGED; OVERLAY DENTURE; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PERIIMPLANTITIS; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TRANSDUCER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BITE FORCE; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, COMPLETE, LOWER; DENTURE, OVERLAY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TRANSDUCERS;

EID: 84860886933     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00370.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Naert I, Alsaadi G, Quirynen M. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:401-410.
2. Bakke M, Holm B, Gotfredsen K. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15:575-581.
3. Allen PF, McMillan AS, Walshaw D. A patient-based assessment of implant-stabilized and conventional complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85:141-147.
4. Awad MA, Locker D, Korner-Bitensky N, Feine JS. Measuring the effect of intra-oral implant rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res 2000; 79:1659-1663.
5. Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, Feine JS. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:117-122.
6. Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, etal. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:390-396.
7. Feine JS, Maskawi K, de Grandmont P, Donohue WB, Tanguay R, Lund JP. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function. J Dent Res 1994; 73:1646-1656.
8. van der Bilt A, van Kampen FM, Cune MS. Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attachment types. Eur J Oral Sci 2006; 114:191-196.
9. Doundoulakis JH, Eckert SE, Lindquist CC, Jeffcoat MK. The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134:1455-1458.
10. Kwon JY, Kim YS, Kim CW. Assessing changes of peri-implant bone using digital subtraction radiography. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2001; 39:273-280.
11. Cehreli MC, Karasoy D, Kokat AM, Akca K, Eckert S. A systematic review of marginal bone loss around implants retaining or supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25:266-277.
12. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria for success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1:11-25.
13. Smith DE, Zarb G. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62:567-572.
14. van Kampen F, Cune M, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. The effect of maximum bite force on marginal bone loss in mandibular overdenture treatment: an in vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16:587-593.
15. Jofré J, Hamada T, Nishimura M, Klattenhoff C. The effect of maximum bite force on marginal bone loss of mini-implants supporting a mandibular overdenture: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21:243-249.
16. Duyck J, Van Oosterwyck H, Vander Sloten J, De Cooman M, Puers R, Naert I. In vivo forces on oral implants supporting a mandibular overdenture: the influence of attachment system. Clin Oral Investig 1999; 3:201-207.
17. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Visser A, Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:722-728.
18. Gotfredsen K, Holm B. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13:125-130.
19. Kenney R, Richards MW. Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:559-564.
20. Ichikawa T, Horiuchi M, Wigianto R, Matsumoto N. In vitro study of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: the influence of stud attachments on load transfer to the implant and soft tissue. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9:394-399.
21. Tokuhisa M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:128-134.
22. Porter JA Jr, Petropoulos VC, Brunski JB. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17:651-662.
23. Mericske-Stern R, Piotti M, Sirtes G. 3-D in vivo force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures. A comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7:387-396.
24. Esposito M, Hirsch J-M, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106:527-551.
25. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark® system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992; 3:104-111.
26. Chung DM, Oh TJ, Lee J, Misch CE, Wang HL. Factors affecting late implant bone loss: a retrospective analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22:117-126.
27. Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F. The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg 1981; 9:15-25.
28. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106:721-764.
29. Albrektsson T, Isidor F. Consensus report of session IV. In: Lang NP, Karring T, eds. Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop Periodontology. London: Quintessence Publishing, 1994:365-369.
30. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Measurements of distances related to the mandibular canal in radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6:96-103.
31. Batenburg R, Meijer H, Geraets W, van der Stelt P. Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27:221-224.
32. Zechner W, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Busenlechner D, Tepper G, Watzek G. Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evaluation of peri-implant bone loss in the anterior atrophic mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:873-878.
33. Mupparapu M, Singer S. Implant imaging for the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc 2004; 70:548-552.
34. Ma S, Tawse-Smith A, Thomson WM, Payne AG. Marginal bone loss with mandibular two-implant overdentures using different loading protocols and attachment systems: 10-year outcomes. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23:321-332.
35. Turkyilmaz I. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures on Brånemark implants. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33:233-238.
36. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, Lekholm U. Identification of bone quality in conjunction with insertion of titanium implants. A pilot study in jaw autopsy specimens. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6:213-219.
37. Merickse-Stern R. Clinical evaluation of overdenture restorations supported by osseointegrated titanium implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5:375-383.
38. Payne AGT, Tawse-Smith A, Duncan WJ, Kumara R. Conventional early loading of unsplinted ITI implants supporting mandibular overdentures: two-year results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 13:603-609.
39. Lindquist LW, Rockler B, Carlsson GE. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59:59-63.
40. Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. Association between marginal bone loss around osseointegrated mandibular implants and smoking habits: a 10-year follow-up study. J Dent Res 1997; 76:1667-1674.
41. Wang L, Sadler JP, Breeding LC, Dixon DL. An in vitro study of implant-tooth-supported connections using a robot test system. J Biomech Eng 1999; 121:290-297.
42. Van Oosterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander Sloten J, etal. The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9:407-418.
43. Duyck J, Van Oosterwyck H, Vander Sloten J, De Cooman M, Puers R, Naert I. Magnitude and distribution of occlusal forces on oral implants supporting fixed prostheses: an in vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11:465-475.
44. El Askary AS, Meffert RM, Griffin T. Why do dental implants fail? Part I. Implant Dent 1999; 8:173-185.
45. Lobbezoo F, Brouwers JE, Cune MS, Naeije M. Dental implants in patients with bruxing habits. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33:152-159.