A knowledge-based model of parliamentary election

Information Sciences

Volumn 202, Issue , 2012, Pages 24-40

  Hołubiec, Jerzy ^a,b   Szkatuła, Grazyna ^a   Wagner, Dariusz ^a  

^a SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

^b JOHN PAUL II CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF LUBLIN   (Poland)

Author keywords

Decision rules; Electorate preferences; Machine learning from examples; Parliamentary election

Indexed keywords

ACTION RULES; DECISION RULES; ELECTORAL CAMPAIGN; ELECTORATE PREFERENCES; KNOWLEDGE-BASED MODEL; LEARNING FROM EXAMPLES; PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 84860841537     PISSN: 00200255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. S. Brams, The Presidential Election Game, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1978, Rev. ed., A.K. Peters, 2008.
2. C.Y.C. Chu, and W.-F. Lin Knightial uncertainty and the voting paradox American Political Science Review 68 1974 525 536
3. A. Gelman, J.N. Katz, and J. Bafumi Standard voting power indexes do not work: an empirical analysis British Journal of Political Sciences 34 2004 657 674 (Pubitemid 39459021)
4. A. Gelman, J.N. Katz, and F. Tuerlinckx The mathematics and statistics of voting power Statistical Science 17 4 2002 420 435
5. A. Gelman, G. King, and W.J. Boscardin Estimating the probability of events that have never occurred: when is your vote decisive? Journal of the American Statistical Association 93 441 1988 1 9
6. M. Holler, and P. Skott Election campaigns, agenda setting and electoral outcomes Public Choice 125 2005 215 228 (Pubitemid 41737058)
7. J. Hołubiec, J. Mercik, Inside Voting Procedures, Accedo Verlag, Munchen, 1998.
8. J. Hołubiec, G. Szkatuła, and D. Wagner Discovering electorate preferences in voting procedures Homo Oeconomicus 24 3/4 2007 435 447
9. J. Hołubiec, G. Szkatuła, and D. Wagner Machine learning approach for discovering electorate preferences during parliamentary election K. Atanassov, P. Chountas, J. Kacprzyk, Development in Fuzzy Sets, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Generalized Nets and Related Topics Applications vol. II 2008 Academic Publishing House EXIT 49 64
10. J. Kacprzyk, and G. Szkatuła An integer programming approach to inductive learning using genetic and greedy algorithms L.C. Jain, J. Kacprzyk, New Learning Paradigms in Soft Computing Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing 2002 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 323 367
11. J.N. Katz, and G. King A statistical model for multiparty electoral data American Political Science Review 93 1 1999
12. F. Knight, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Boston Houghton Mifflin, 1921.
13. J. Mańdziuk Knowledge - Free and Learning - Based Methods in Intelligent Game Playing 2010 Springer Berlin
14. M. Mazur, Political Marketing (in Polish), Scientific Publisher PWN, Warsaw, 2002.
15. S.E. Rigdon, S.H. Jacobson, W.K. Tam Cho, E.C. Sewell, Ch.J. Rigdon, A Bayesian prediction model for the US presidential election, American Politics Research (2009) 700-724.
16. W. Riker The Theory of Political Coalitions 1962 Yale University New Haven
17. T.L. Saaty The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980 McGraw-Hill New York
18. J. Sokołowska, Evaluation of Risk for Political Parties in a Multiparty Parliamentary Election, Decisions, vol. 13, L. Koźmiń ski Academy, Warsaw, 2010, pp. 85-106.
19. G. Szkatuła, Modified set covering problem applied to machine learning (in Polish), in: J. Gutenbaum (Ed.), Automatyka Sterowanie Zarzadzanie, SRI PAS, Warsaw, 2002, pp. 431-445.
20. G. Szkatuła, and D. Wagner Programmes of parties versus their location on the political scene. Application of decision rules to describe the differences J. Kacprzyk, D. Wagner, Group Decisions and Voting 2003 Academic Publishing House EXIT Warsaw 227 238