Host bone response to polyetheretherketone versus porous tantalum implants for cervical spinal fusion in a goat model

Spine

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2012, Pages

  Sinclair, Sarina K ^a,b   Konz, Gina J ^c   Dawson, John M ^c   Epperson, Richard T ^a,b   Bloebaum, Roy D ^a,b  

^a Salt Lake City Hlth Care S   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Zimmer Spine Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

ACDF; cervical spine; interbody fusion; PEEK; tantalum

Indexed keywords

POLYETHERETHERKETONE; TANTALUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; BONE GRAFT; BONE GROWTH; BONE MINERALIZATION; CERVICAL SPINE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUOROCHROME STAINING; GOAT; GRAFT DYSFUNCTION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; ILIAC CREST; IMPLANT; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; SPINE FUSION;

ANIMALS; BONE REMODELING; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; GOATS; HOST VS GRAFT REACTION; KETONES; MODELS, ANIMAL; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POROSITY; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SPINAL FUSION; TANTALUM;

EID: 84860836277     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318240f981     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Dufour T, Huppert J, Louis C, et al. Radiological analysis of 37 segments in cervical spine implanted with a PEEK stand-alone device, with at least one year follow-up. Br J Neurosurg 2010; 24: 633-40.
2. Pechlivanis I, Thuring T, Brenke C, et al. Non-fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and implantation of empty polyetherether-ketone cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: 15-20.
3. Hee HT, Kundnani V. Rationale for use of polyetheretherketone polymer interbody cage device in cervical spine surgery. Spine J 2010; 10: 66-9.
4. Park HW, Lee JK, Moon SJ, et al. The efficacy of the synthetic inter-body cage and grafton for anterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: E591-5.
5. Sidhu KS, Prochnow TD, Schmitt P, et al. Anterior cervical inter-body fusion with rhBMP-2 and tantalum in a goat model. Spine J 2001; 1: 331-40. (Pubitemid 33377772)
6. Fernandez-Fairen M, Sala P, Dufoo M Jr, et al. Anterior cervical fusion with tantalum implant: a prospective randomized controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33: 465-72. (Pubitemid 351644448)
7. Zardiackas LD, Parsell DE, Dillon LD, et al. Structure, metallurgy, and mechanical properties of a porous tantalum foam. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 58: 180-7. (Pubitemid 32231676)
8. Levine BR, Sporer S, Poggie RA, et al. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 4671-81. (Pubitemid 43849977)
9. Bobyn JD, Poggie RA, Krygier JJ, et al. Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86A (suppl 2): 123-9. (Pubitemid 39628356)
10. Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, et al. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81B: 907-14. (Pubitemid 29438375)
11. D'Angelo F, Murena L, Campagnolo M, et al. Analysis of bone ingrowth on a tantalum cup. Indian J Orthop 2008; 42: 275-8.
12. Wang JC, Yu WD, Sandhu HS, et al. A comparison of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic image quality after the implantation of tantalum and titanium spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23: 1684-8. (Pubitemid 28433868)
13. Levi AD, Choi WG, Keller PJ, et al. The radiographic and imaging characteristics of porous tantalum implants within the human cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23: 1245-50; discussion 51.
14. Frost HM. Tetracycline-based histological analysis of bone remodeling. Editorial. Calcif Tissue Res 1969; 3: 211-37.
15. Emmanual J, Hornbeck C, Bloebaum RD. A polymethyl methacry-late method for large specimens of mineralized bone with implants. Stain Technol 1987; 62: 401-10.
16. Sanderson C, Kitabayashi LR. Parallel experience of two different laboratories with the initiator perkadox 16 for polymerization of methylmethacrylates. J Histotechnol 1994; 17: 343-8.
17. Bloebaum RD, Merrell M, Gustke K, et al. Retrieval analysis of a hydroxyapatite-coated hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; 267: 97-102.
18. Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN, Boyce TM. Backscattered electron imaging: the role in calcified tissue and implant analysis. J Biomater Appl 1990; 5: 56-85.
19. Rhodes DM, Hofmann AA, Bloebaum RD. Histologic backscat-tered imaging and microradiographic analysis of two bilaterally retrieved tibial tray components of different designs and materials. Clin Res 1989; 37: 224A.
20. Meunier P, Edouard C, Richard D, et al. Histomorphometry of osteoid tissue: the hyperosteoidoses. In Meunier PJ, ed. Bone Histo-morphometry. Toulouse, France: Societe de la Nouvelle Imprimerie Fournie; 1977: 249-62.
21. Frost HM, Villanueva AR, Roth H, et al. Tetracycline bone labeling. J New Drugs 1961;1: 206-16.
22. Sanderson C, Bachus KN. Staining technique to differentiate mineralized and demineralized bone in ground sections. J Histotechnol 1997; 20: 119-22. (Pubitemid 27250867)
23. Wigfield C, Robertson J, Gill S, et al. Clinical experience with porous tantalum cervical interbody implants in a prospective randomized controlled trial. Br J Neurosurg 2003; 17: 418-25. (Pubitemid 37421566)
24. Vicario C, Lopez-Oliva F, Sanchez-Lorente T, et al. [Anterior cervical fusion with tantalum interbody implants. Clinical and radiological results in a prospective study]. Neurocirugia (Astur) 2006; 17: 132-9; discussion 9. (Pubitemid 43774244)
25. Hofmann AA, Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN. Progression of human bone ingrowth into porous-coated implants. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68: 161-6.
26. Willie B, Bloebaum R, Bireley W, et al. Determining relevance of a weight-bearing ovine model for bone ingrowth assessment. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2004; 69A: 567-76. (Pubitemid 38668183)
27. Shimko DA, Shimko VF, Sander EA, et al. Effect of porosity on the fluid flow characteristics and mechanical properties of tantalum scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005; 73: 315-24. (Pubitemid 40628995)
28. Hulbert SF, Morrison SJ, Klawitter JJ. Tissue reaction to three ceramics of porous and non-porous structures. J Biomed Mater Res 1972; 6: 347-74.
29. Kalita S, Bose S, Hosick HL, Bandyopadhya A. Development of controlled porosity polymer-ceramic composite scaffolds via fused deposition modeling. Mater Sci Eng C 2003; 23: 611-20. (Pubitemid 37261901)
30. Ellingsen JE. Surface configurations of dental implants. Periodontol 2000 1998; 17: 36-46. (Pubitemid 128556015)
31. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants with different surface characteristics subjected to static load. A study in the dog (II). Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 196-201. (Pubitemid 33723220)
32. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2: 120-8.
33. Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN, Jensen JW, et al. Porous-coated metal-backed patellar components in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1998; 80A: 518-28. (Pubitemid 28176567)
34. Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN, Jensen JW, et al. Postmortem analysis of consecutively retrieved asymmetric porous-coated tibial components. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 920-9. (Pubitemid 28037661)
35. Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 208: 108-13. (Pubitemid 16049779)
36. Søballe K, Hansen ES, Rasmussen HB, et al. Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions. J Orthop Res 1992; 10: 285-99.
37. Bloebaum RD, Willie BM, Mitchell BS, et al. Relationship between bone ingrowth, mineral apposition rate, and osteoblast activity. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007; 81A: 505-14. (Pubitemid 46668866)
38. Bridwell KH, Anderson PA, Boden SD, et al. What's new in spine surgery? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 92: 2017-28.
39. Cook SD, Patron LP, Christakis PM, et al. Comparison of methods for determining the presence and extent of anterior lumbar inter-body fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 1118-23. (Pubitemid 38649828)
40. Shea JE, Vajda EG, Bloebaum RD. Evidence of a hypermineralized calcified fibrocartilage on the human femoral neck and lesser tro-chanter. J Anat 2001; 198: 153-62. (Pubitemid 32177978)
41. Bloebaum RD, Kopp DV. Remodeling capacity of calcified fibrocar-tilage of the hip. Anat Rec A 2004; 279A: 736-9. (Pubitemid 39038466)
42. Sinclair KD, Curtis BD, Koller KE, et al. Characterization of the anchoring morphology and mineral content of the anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligaments of the knee. Anat Rec 2011;294:831-8.
43. Benjamin M, Ralphs JR. Fibrocartilage in tendons and ligaments\an adaptation to compressive load. J Anat 1998; 193: 481-94. (Pubitemid 29026948)
44. Shea JE, Hallows RK, Bloebaum RD. Experimental confirmation of the sheep model for studying the role of calcified fibrocartilage in hip fractures and tendon attachments. Anat Rec 2002; 266: 177-83. (Pubitemid 34215466)