A comparison of posterior simulation and inference by combining rules for multiple imputation

Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 335-347

  Si, Yajuan ^a   Reiter, Jerome P ^a  

^a Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian; Confidentiality; Missing; Synthetic

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860806000     PISSN: 15598608     EISSN: 15598616     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15598608.2011.10412032     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abowd, J., Stinson, M., and, Benedetto, G. 2006. Final report to the Social Security Administration on the SIPP/SSA/IRS public use file project. Available at http://www.bls.census.gov/sipp/synth-data.html Tech. rept. U.S. Census Bureau Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program
2. Barnard, J., and, Meng, X. 1999. Applications of multiple imputation in medical studies: From AIDS to NHANES. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8: 17-36. (Pubitemid 29222785)
3. Barnard, J., and, Rubin, D. B. 1999. Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple-imputation. Biometrika, 86: 948-955.
4. Drechsler, J., Bender, S., and, Rssler, S. 2008a. Comparing fully and partially synthetic datasets for statistical disclosure control in the German IAB Establishment Panel. Transactions on Data Privacy, 1: 105-130.
5. Drechsler, J., Dundler, A., Bender, S., Rssler, S., and, Zwick, T. 2008b. A new approach for disclosure control in the IAB Establishment Panel-Multiple imputation for a better data access. Advances in Statistical Analysis, 92: 439-458.
6. Fienberg, S. E. 1994. A radical proposal for the provision of micro-data samples and the preservation of confidentiality, Tech. rept. Department of Statistics, Carnegie-Mellon University.
7. Graham, P., and, Penny, R. 2005. Multiply imputed synthetic data files, Tech. rept. University of Otago. http://www.uoc.otago.ac.nz/departments/ pubhealth/pgrahpub.htm
8. Graham, P., Young, J., and, Penny, R. 2009. Multiply imputed synthetic data: Evaluation of hierarchical Bayesian imputation models. Journal of Official Statistics, 25: 245-268.
9. Hawala, S. Producing partially synthetic data to avoid disclosure. Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
10. Heitjan, D. F., and, Little, R. J.A. 1991. Multiple imputation for the Fatal Accident Reporting System. Applied Statistics, 40: 13-29.
11. Kennickell, A. B. 1997. Multiple imputation and disclosure protection: The case of the 1995 Survey of Consumer Finances. In Record Linkage Techniques, 1997, Edited by: Alvey, W. and Jamerson, B. 248-267. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
12. Kinney, S. K., and, Reiter, J. P. Making public use, synthetic files of the Longitudinal Business Database. Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
13. Little, R. J.A. 1993. Statistical analysis of masked data. Journal of Official Statistics, 9: 407-426.
14. Meng, Xiao-Li. 1994. Multiple-imputation inferences with uncongenial sources of input (Disc: P558-573). Statistical Science, 9: 538-558.
15. Raghunathan, T. E., and, Paulin, G. S. Multiple imputation of income in the Consumer Expenditure Survey: Evaluation of statistical inference. Proceedings of the Section on Business and Economic Statistics of the American Statistical Association. pp. 1-10.
16. Raghunathan, T. E., Lepkowski, J. M., van Hoewyk, J., and, Solenberger, P. 2001. A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a series of regression models. Survey Methodology, 27: 85-96.
17. Raghunathan, T. E., Reiter, J. P., and, Rubin, D. B. 2003. Multiple imputation for statistical disclosure limitation. Journal of Official Statistics, 19: 1-16.
18. Reiter, J. P. 2002. Satisfying disclosure restrictions with synthetic data sets. Journal of Official Statistics, 18: 531-544.
19. Reiter, J. P. 2003. Inference for partially synthetic, public use microdata sets. Survey Methodology, 29: 181-189.
20. Reiter, J. P. 2004. Simultaneous use of multiple imputation for missing data and disclosure limitation. Survey Methodology, 30: 235-242.
21. Reiter, J. P. 2005a. Releasing multiply-imputed, synthetic public use microdata: An illustration and empirical study. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 168: 185-205. (Pubitemid 40166968)
22. Reiter, J. P. 2005b. Significance tests for multi-component estimands from multiply-imputed, synthetic microdata. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 131: 365-377. (Pubitemid 40280345)
23. Reiter, J. P. 2008. Selecting the number of imputed datasets when using multiple imputation for missing data and disclosure limitation. Statistics and Probability Letters, 78: 15-20.
24. Reiter, J. P., and, Raghunathan, T. E. 2007. The multiple adaptations of multiple imputation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102: 1462-1471.
25. Rubin, D. B. 1981. The Bayesian bootstrap. The Annals of Statistics, 9: 130-134.
26. Rubin, D. B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys, New York: John Wiley Sons.
27. Rubin, D. B. 1993. Discussion: Statistical disclosure limitation. Journal of Official Statistics, 9: 462-468.
28. Rubin, D. B. 1996. Multiple imputation after 18+ years. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91: 473-489.
29. Schafer, J. L., Ezzati-Rice, T. M., Johnson, W., Khare, M., Little, R. J.A., and, Rubin, D. B. The NHANES III multiple imputation project. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods of the American Statistical Association. pp. 28-37.
30. Schenker, N., Raghunathan, T. E., Chiu, P., Makuc, D. M., Zhang, G., and, Cohen, A. J. 2006. Multiple imputation of missing income data in the National Health Interview Survey. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101: 924-933. (Pubitemid 44422595)
31. Zhou, X., and, Reiter, J. P. 2010. A note on Bayesian inference after multiple imputation. The American Statistician, 64: 159-163.