Microstructure, degradation and in vitro MG63 cells interactions of a new poly(ε-caprolactone), zein, and hydroxyapatite composite for bone tissue engineering

Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 210-226

  Salerno, Aurelio ^a,b   Zeppetelli, Stefania ^b   Oliviero, Maria ^b   Battista, Edmondo ^a   Di Maio, Ernesto ^c   Iannace, Salvatore ^b   Netti, Paolo A ^a,c  

^a ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^b CNR   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

bone regeneration; composite; degradation; hydroxyapatite; polycaprolactone; zein

Indexed keywords

BONE REGENERATION; BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING; CANDIDATE MATERIALS; CAPROLACTONE; DEGRADABILITY; HYDROXYAPATITE COMPOSITE; HYDROXYAPATITE PARTICLES; IN-VITRO; MG63 CELLS; MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; PHOSPHATE BUFFER SALINES; POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS; WEIGHT CHANGE;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BLENDING; BONE; CELL CULTURE; COMPOSITE MATERIALS; DEGRADATION; POLYCAPROLACTONE; REINFORCED PLASTICS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; ZEIN;

HYDROXYAPATITE;

HYDROXYAPATITE; POLYCAPROLACTONE; THERMOPLASTIC ZEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZEIN;

ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABILITY; BONE TISSUE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROPHILICITY; IN VITRO STUDY; MG63 OSTEOBLAST; MORPHOLOGY; OSTEOBLAST; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE ENGINEERING; WETTABILITY;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84860795523     PISSN: 08839115     EISSN: 15308030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0883911512442564     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. El Kady AM, Mohamed KR, El-Bassyouni GT. Fabrication, characterization and bioactivity evaluation of calcium pyrophosphate/polymeric biocomposites. Ceram Int. 2009 ; 35 (7). 2933-2942
2. Boccaccini AR, Erol M, Stark WJ, et al. Polymer/bioactive glass nanocomposites for biomedical applications: a review. Comput Sci Technol. 2010 ; 70 (13). 1764-1776
3. Mano JF, Silva GA, Azevedo HS, et al. Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: present status and some moving trends. J R Soc Interface. 2007 ; 4 (17). 999-1030 (Pubitemid 350303872)
4. Murugan R, Ramakrishna S. Development of nanocomposites for bone grafting. Comput Sci Technol. 2005 ; 65: 2385-2406 (Pubitemid 41574394)
5. Santin M, Morris C, Standen G, et al. A new class of bioactive and biodegradable soybean-based bone fillers. Biomacromolecules. 2007 ; 8 (9). 2706-2711 (Pubitemid 47516919)
6. Qu Z, Wang H, Tang T, et al. Evaluation of the zein/inorganics composite on biocompatibility and osteoblastic differentiation. Acta Biomater. 2008 ; 4: 1360-1368
7. Tu J, Wang H, Li H, et al. The in vivo bone formation by mesenchymal stem cells in zein scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2009 ; 30 (26). 4369-4376
8. Liu K, Hsieh F. Protein-protein interactions during high-moisture extrusion for fibrous meat analogues and comparison of protein solubility methods using different solvent systems. J Agric Food Chem. 2008 ; 56 (8). 2681-2687 (Pubitemid 351685211)
9. Zein I, Hutmacher DW, Tan KC, et al. Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 2002 ; 23 (4). 1169-1185 (Pubitemid 33109049)
10. Puppi D, Chiellini F, Piras AM, et al. Polymeric materials for bone and cartilage repair. Prog Polym Sci. 2010 ; 35 (4). 403-440
11. Zhong Z, Sun XS. Properties of soy protein isolate/polycaprolactone blends compatibilized by methylene diphenyl diisocyanate. Polymer. 2001 ; 42 (16). 6961-6969 (Pubitemid 32441165)
12. Salgado AJ, Sousa RA, Fraga JS, et al. Effects of starch/ polycaprolactone-based blends for spinal cord injury regeneration in neurons/glial cells viability and proliferation. J Bioact Compat Pol. 2009 ; 24 (3). 235-248
13. Salerno A, Guarnieri D, Iannone M, et al. Effect of micro- and macroporosity of bone tissue three-dimensional-poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffold on human mesenchymal stem cells invasion, proliferation, and differentiation in vitro. Tissue Eng Pt A. 2010 ; 16 (8). 2661-2673
14. Borzacchiello A, Gloria A, Mayol L, et al. Natural/synthetic porous scaffold designs and properties for fibro-cartilaginous tissue engineering. J Bioact Compat Pol. 2011 ; 26 (5). 437-451
15. Salerno A, Oliviero M, Di Maio E, et al. Design of porous polymeric scaffolds by gas foaming of heterogeneous blends. J Mater Sci-Mater M. 2009 ; 20 (10). 2043-2051
16. Salerno A, Oliviero M, Di Maio E, et al. Design of novel three-phase PCL/TZ-HA biomaterials for use in bone regeneration applications. J Mater Sci-Mater M. 2010 ; 21 (9). 2569-2581
17. Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker JJ, et al. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006 ; 27 (18). 3413-3431
18. Tan PS, Teoh SH. Effect of stiffness of polycaprolactone (PCL) membrane on cell proliferation. Mat Sci Eng C-Biomim. 2007 ; 27 (2). 304-308 (Pubitemid 46210164)
19. Shi K, Kokini JL, Huang Q. Engineering zein films with controlled surface morphology and hydrophilicity. J Agric Food Chem. 2009 ; 57 (6). 2186-2192
20. Lee JH, Rim NG, Jung HS, et al. Control of osteogenic differentiation and mineralization of human mesenchymal stem cells on composite nanofibers containing poly[lactic-co-(glycolic acid)] and hydroxyapatite. Macromol Biosci. 2010 ; 10 (2). 173-182
21. Corradini E, Mattoso LHC, Guedes CGF, et al. Mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of poly(ε-caprolactone)/zein blends. Polym Advan Technol. 2004 ; 15 (6). 340-345 (Pubitemid 38740200)
22. Wan YZ, Luo H, He F, et al. Mechanical, moisture absorption, and biodegradation behaviours of bacterial cellulose fibre-reinforced starch biocomposites. Comput Sci Technol. 2009 ; 69 (7-8). 1212-1217
23. Zheng Z, Wei Y, Wang G, et al. Surface properties of chitosan films modified with polycations and their effects on the behavior of PC12 cells. J Bioact Compat Pol. 2009 ; 24 (1). 63-82
24. Meredith JC, Sormana J, Keselowsky BG, et al. Combinatorial characterization of cell interactions with polymer surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003 ; 66: 483-490 (Pubitemid 37517193)
25. Kunzler TP, Drobek T, Schuler M, et al. Systematic study of osteoblast and fibroblast response to roughness by means of surface-morphology gradients. Biomaterials. 2007 ; 28 (13). 2175-2182 (Pubitemid 46216454)
26. Navarro M, Engel E, Planell JA, et al. Surface characterization and cell response of a PLA/CaP glass biodegradable composite material. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008 ; 85 (2). 477-486 (Pubitemid 351535330)
27. Salerno A, Zeppetelli S, Di Maio E, et al. Processing/structure/property relationship of multi-scaled PCL and PCL-HA composite scaffolds prepared via gas foaming and NaCl reverse templating. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011 ; 108 (4). 963-976
28. Dong J, Sun Q, Wang J. Basic study of corn protein, zein, as a biomaterial in tissue engineering, surface morphology and biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2004 ; 25 (19). 4691-4697 (Pubitemid 38561156)
29. Deligianni DD, Katsala ND, Koutsoukos PG, et al. Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. Biomaterials. 2001 ; 22 (1). 87-96
30. Bekarde IG, Gümüdereliolu M. Biomimetic apatite-coated PCL scaffolds: effect of surface nanotopography on cellular functions. J Bioact Compat Pol. 2009 ; 24 (1). 63-82
31. Zhao G, Raines AL, Wieland M, et al. Requirement for both micron-and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials. 2007 ; 28 (18). 2821-2829 (Pubitemid 46482664)