Surface characterization and cell response of a PLA/CaP glass biodegradable composite material

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 477-486

  Navarro, M ^a   Engel, E ^a   Planell, J A ^a   Amaral, I ^b   Barbosa, M ^b,c   Ginebra, M P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b INEB INSTITUTO DE ENGENHARIA BIOMÉDICA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Cell culture; Glass; In vitro test; Polylactic acid; Surface analysis

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; BONE; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; GLASS; HYDROPHILICITY; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

BIODEGRADABLE COMPOSITE MATERIALS; BONE REGENERATION; CELL RESPONSE;

COMPOSITE MATERIALS;

3 (4,5 DIMETHYL 2 THIAZOLYL) 2,5 DIPHENYLTETRAZOLIUM BROMIDE; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; OSTEOCALCIN; POLYLACTIC ACID;

ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOSKELETON; GLASS; HUMANS; HYDROPHOBICITY; LACTIC ACID; MATERIALS TESTING; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCALCIN; POLYMERS; WETTABILITY;

EID: 42149187233     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31546     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barrows T. Degradable implants materials: A review of synthetic absorbable polymers and their applications. Clin Mater 1986;1:233-267.
2. Ciccone W, Motz C, Bentley C, Tasto J. Bioabsorbable implants in orthopaedics: New developments and clinical applications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001;9:280-288.
3. Dunn RL. Clinical applications and update on the poly (alpha-hydroxy acids). In: Hollinger JO, editor. Biomedical Applications of Synthetic Biodegradable Polymers. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1995. p 17-31.
4. Middleton JC, Tipton AJ. Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. Biomaterials 2000;21:2335-2346.
5. Böstman O Current concepts review. Absorbable implants for fracture fixation. J Bone Joint Surgery 1991;73A:148-153.
6. Ashammakhi N, Suuronen R, Tiainen J, Tormala P, Waris T. Spotlight on naturally absorbable osteofixation devices. J Craniofac Surg 2003;14:247-259.
7. Hou QP, Grijpma DW, Feijen J. Porous polymeric structures for tissue engineering prepared by a coagulation, compression moulding and salt leaching technique. Biomaterials 2003;24:1937-1947.
8. Kellomaki M, Niiranen H, Puumanen K, Ashammakhi N, Waris T, Tormala P. Bioabsorbable scaffolds for guided bone regeneration and generation. Biomaterials 2000;21:2495-2505.
9. Mooney DJ, Park S, Kaufmann PM, Sano K, Mcnamara K, Vacanti JP, Langer R. Biodegradable sponges for hepatocyte transplantation. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:959-965.
10. Ragel CV, Vallet-Regi M. In vitro bioactivity and gentamicin release from glass-polymer-antibiotic composites. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:424-429.
11. Kohn J, Langer R. Bioabsorbable and bioerodible materials. In: Ratner BD, Hoffman A, Schoen F, Lemons J, editors. Biomaterials Science. New York: Academic Press; 1996. p 64-72.
12. Navarro M, Ginebra MP, Clement J, Martinez S, Avila G, Planell JA. Physicochemical degradation of titania-stabilized soluble phosphate glasses for medical applications. J Am Ceram Soc 2003;86:1345-1352.
13. Navarro M, Ginebra MP, Planell JA, Barrias CC, Barbosa M. In vitro degradation behavior of a novel bioabsorbable composite material based on PLA and a soluble CaP glass. Acta Biomaterialia 2005;1:411-419.
14. Stephansson SN, Byers BA, Garcia AJ. Enhanced expression of the osteoblastic phenotype on substrates that modulate fibronectin conformation and integrin receptor binding. Biomaterials 2002;23:2527-2534.
15. Keselowsky BG, Collard DM, Garcia AJ. Surface chemistry modulates fibronectin conformation and directs integrin binding and specificity to control cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;66:247-259.
16. Beumer G, van Blitterswijk C, Bakker D, Ponec M. Cell-seeding and in vitro biocompatibility evaluation of polymeric matrices of PEO/PBT copolymers and PLLA. Biomaterials 1993;14:598-604.
17. Ishaug S, Yaszemski M, Bizios R, Mikos A. Osteoblast function on synthetic biodegradable polymers. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28:1445-1453.
18. Navarro M, Ginebra MP, Planell JA. Cellular response to calcium phosphate glasses with controlled solubility. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:1009-1015.
19. Huffman KR, Casey DJ. Effect of carboxyl end groups on hydrolysis of polyglycolic acid. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 1985;23:1939-1954.
20. Ishaug-Riley SL, Okun LE, Prado G, Applegate MA, Ratcliffe A. Human articular chondrocyte adhesion and proliferation on synthetic biodegradable polymer films. Biomaterials 1999;20:2245-2256.
21. Park A, Griffith L. In vitro cell response to differences in poly-1-lactide crystallinity. Biomaterials 1996;31:117-130.
22. Cai KY, Yao KD, Lin SB, Yang ZM, Li XQ, Xie HQ, et al. Poly (D, L-lactic acid) surfaces modified by silk fibroin: Effects on the culture of osteoblast in vitro. Biomaterials 2002;23:1153-1160.
23. Lopes MA, Monteiro FJ, Santos JD, Serro AP, Saramago B. Hydrophobicity, surface tension, and zeta potential measurements of glass-reinforced hydroxyapatite composites. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:370-375.
24. Vogler EA. Structure and reactivity of water at biomaterial surfaces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 1998;74:69-117.
25. Vogler EA. Interfacial chemistry in biomaterials science. In: Berg JC, editor. Wettability, Surfactant Science Series. Marcel Dekker, New York 1993. p 183-250.
26. Charles-Harris M, Navarro M, Engel E, Aparicio C, Ginebra MP, Planell J. A Surface characterisation of completely degradable composite scaffolds. J Mater Svi: Mater Med 2005;16:1125-1130.
27. Lampin M, WarocquierClerout R, Legris C, Degrange M, SigotLuizard MF. Correlation between substratum roughness and wettability, cell adhesion, and cell migration. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:99-108.
28. Khang G, Jeon JH, Lee LW, Cho SC, Lee HB. Cell and platlet adhesion on plasma glow discharge-treated poly(lactide-co-glycolide). Biomed Mater Engl 1997;7:357-368.
29. Webb K, Hlady V, Tresco PA. Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3T3 fibroblast attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;41:422-430.
30. Owen TA, Aronow M, Shalhoub V, Barone LM, Wilming L, Tassinari MS, et al. Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro - Reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular-matrix. J Cell Physiol 1990;143:420-430.
31. Lian JB, Stein GS. Concepts of osteoblast growth and differentiation - Basis for modulation of bone cell-development and tissue formation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1992;3:269-305.
32. Quarles LD, Yohay DA, Lever LW, Caton R, Wenstrup RJ. Distinct proliferative and differentiated stages of murine Mc3T3-E1 cells in culture - An in vitro model of osteoblast development. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:683-692.
33. Boyan BD, Dean DD, Lohmann CH, Cochran DL, Sylvia VL, Schwartz Z. The titanium-bone cell interface in vitro: The role of the surface in promoting osteointegration. In: Brunette D, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P, editors. Titanium in Medicine. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2001. p 562-585.
34. Gronowicz G, McCarthy MB, Ahmad M. Direct integrin-mediated attachment of human osteoblasts to implants. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:S323.
35. Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Kieswetter K, Schraub D, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Effect of titanium surface characteristics on chondrocytes and osteoblasts in vitro. Scan Electron Microsc 1995;5:323-335.
36. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Schraub DM, Simpson J, Lankford J, et al. Effect of titanium surface-roughness on proliferation. Differentiation, and protein-synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:389-401.