Validity and responsiveness of the Dutch McMaster Toronto Arthritis Patient Preference Questionnaire (MACTAR) in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee

Journal of Rheumatology

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1064-1073

  Barten, Di Janne J A ^a   Pisters, Martijn F ^a   Takken, Tim ^a   Veenhof, Cindy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Knee; Osteoarthritis hip; Physical fitness; Reproducibility of results

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DUTCH; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MCMASTER TORONTO ARTHRITIS PATIENT PREFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE; MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SHORT FORM 36; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT MOBILITY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WALKING; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX;

AGED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84860768188     PISSN: 0315162X     EISSN: 14992752     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.110876     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Poos M, Gommer A. Hoe vaak komt artrose voor en hoeveel mensen sterven eraan? In: Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid. Bilthoven, Netherlands: Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment; 2009.
2. Bellamy N, Kirwan J, Boers M, Brooks P, Strand V, Tugwell P, et al. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol 1997;24:799-802. (Pubitemid 27146105)
3. Dekker J, Boot B, van der Woude L, Bijlsma J. Pain and disability in osteoarthritis: A review of biobehavioural mechanisms. J Behav Med 1992;15:189-214.
4. Felson D, Lawrence R, Dieppe P, Hirsch R, Helminck C, Jordan J, et al. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1. The disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:635-46.
5. McAlindon T, Cooper C, Kirwan J, Dieppe P. Determinants of disability in osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis 1993;52:258-62. (Pubitemid 23103354)
6. Jordan K, Arden N, Doberty M, Bannwarth B, Bijlsma J. EULAR recommendations 2003: An evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: Report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCICIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:1145-55. (Pubitemid 37500619)
7. Vogels E, Hendriks H, van Baar M, Dekker J, Hopman-Rock M, Oostendorp R, et al. KNGF-richtlijn artrose heup-knie. Amersfoort, Netherlands: Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy; 2001.
8. Brandt K. The importance of nonpharmacologic approaches in management of osteoarthritis. Am J Med 1998;105:39S-44s. (Pubitemid 28378016)
9. Fransen M, McConnell S. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Sys Rev 2008;8:CD004376.
10. Fransen M, McConnell S, Hernandez-Molina G, Reichenbach S. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip. Cochrane Database Sys Rev 2009;8:CD007912.
11. Tan J, Horn S. Practical manual of physical medicine and rehabilitation: Diagnostics, therapeutics, and basis problems. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2006.
12. Terwee C, Mokkink L, Steultjens M, Dekker J. Performance-based methods for measuring the physical function of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: A systematic review of measurement properties. Rheumatology 2006;45:890-902. (Pubitemid 43985382)
13. Veenhof C, Bijlsma J, van den Ende C, van Dijk G, Pisters M, Dekker J. Psychometric evaluation of osteoarthritis questionnaires: A systematic review of the literature. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55:480-92. (Pubitemid 43890904)
14. Bellamy N, Buchanan W, Goldsmith C, Campbell J, Stitt L. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1833-40. (Pubitemid 19037656)
15. McHorney C, Ware J, Lu R, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data-quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994;32:40-66.
16. McHorney C, Tarlov A. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995;4:293-307.
17. Ware J, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I: Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
18. Seror R, Tubach F, Baron G, Guillemin F, Ravaud P. Measure of function in rheumatoid arthritis: Individualized or classical scales? Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:97-101.
19. Jolles BM, Buchbinder R, Beaton DE. A study compared nine patient-specific indices for musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:791-801. (Pubitemid 40973789)
20. Tugwell P, Bombardier C, Buchanan W, Goldsmith C, Grace E, Hanna B. The MACTAR Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire - An individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1987;14:446-51. (Pubitemid 17121196)
21. Verhoeven A, Boers M, van der Linden S. Validity of the MACTAR Questionnaire as functional index in a rheumatoid arthritis clinical trial. J Rheumatol 2000;27:2801-9.
22. Mouthon L, Rannou F, Bérezné A, Pagnoux C, Guilpain P, Goldwasser F, et al. Patient preference disability questionnaire in systemic sclerosis: A cross-sectional survey. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:968-73. (Pubitemid 351990993)
23. Sanchez K, Papelard A, Nguyen C, Jousse M, Rannou F, Revel M, et al. Patient-preference disability assessment for disabling chronic low back pain. Spine 2009;34:1052-9.
24. Veenhof C, Koke J, Dekker J, Oostendorp R, Bijlsma J, van Tulder M, et al. Effectiveness of behavioral graded activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee: A randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55:925-34. (Pubitemid 44917467)
25. Altman R, Asch E, Bloch DA, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 1986;29:1039-49.
26. Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum 1991;34:505-14.
27. Kellgren J, Lawrence J. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;15:494-502.
28. Roorda L, Jones C, Waltz M, Lankhorst G, Bouter L, van der Eijken J, et al. Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:36-42. (Pubitemid 38064601)
29. Aaronson N, Muller M, Cohen P, Essink-Bot M, Fekkes M, Sandermann R, et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;51:1055-68.
30. Kosinski M, Keller S, Hatoum H, Kong S, Ware JE Jr. The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and score reliability. Med Care 1999;37:10-22.
31. Kamper S, Ostelo R, Knol DC, Maher C, de Vet H, Hancock M. Global perceived effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:760-6.
32. Guyatt G, Feeny D, Patrick D. Measuring health related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:622-9. (Pubitemid 23102698)
33. Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, Alonso J, Stratford P, Knol D, et al. International consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes: Results of the COSMIN study. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:737-45.
34. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10:22.
35. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996;65:71-6. (Pubitemid 26227690)
36. Chatman AB, Hyams SP, Neel JM, Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Schomberg A, et al. The patient-specific functional scale: Measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Phys Ther 1997;77:820-9. (Pubitemid 27332974)
37. Kopec J, Esdaille J, Abrahamowicz M, Abenhaim L, Wood-Dauphinee S, Lamping DL, et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties. Spine 1995;20:341-52.
38. Stratford P, Gill C, Westaway M, Binkley J. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: A report of a patient specific measure. Physiotherapy Canada 1995;47:258-63.
39. Kirshner B, Guyatt B. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 1985;38:27-36. (Pubitemid 15136767)
40. Nunnaly JC. Introduction to psychological measurement. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1972.
41. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.; 2000.
42. Terwee C, Dekker F, Wiersinga W, Prummel M, Bossuyt P. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res 2003;12:349-62. (Pubitemid 36612040)
43. Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales; a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
44. Hanley J, McNeil B. The meaning and use of the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-39.
45. Fries J, Spitz P, Young D. Dimensions of health outcome: The Health Assessment Questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol 1982;9:727-35.
46. Guyatt G, Norman G, Juniper E, Griffith LE. A critical look at transition ratings. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:900-8. (Pubitemid 35246561)
47. Norman G, Stratford P, Regehr G. Methodological problems in retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lessons of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:869-79. (Pubitemid 27423516)
48. Terwee C, Roorda L, Dekker J, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Peat G, Jordan K, et al. Mind the MIC: Large variations among populations and methods. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:524-34.