Media framing of stem cell research: A cross-national analysis of political representation of science between the UK and South Korea

Journal of Science Communication

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2011, Pages

  Kim, Leo ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860765878     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18242049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.22323/2.10030202     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. M. Bauer and J.M. Gutteling (2002), Media coverage 1973-1996: trends and dynamics, in M. Bauer and G. Gaskell eds., Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K.
2. J. Durant, M. Bauer and J. Gaskell (1998), Biotechnology in the Public Sphere, Science Museum, London U.K.
3. M. Bauer and J. Gaskell eds. (2001), Biotechnology, 1996-2000. Science Museum.
4. R.M. Entman (1993), Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm, Journal of Communication 43: 51-58.
5. G. Lakoff and M. Johnson (1980), Metaphors we live by, University of Chicago Press, Chicago U.S.A.
6. M. Bauer and K. Petkova (2005), Long-Term Trends in the Public Representation of Science Across the 'Iron-Curtain': 1946-95, Social Studies of Science 34(1).
7. http://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/poll.aspx?oItemId=580&view=wide.
8. International Socialism Spring 2003, ISBN 1-898876-97-5.
9. Voting Intention by Newspaper Readership Quarter 1 2005, Ipsos MORI, 21 April 2005.
10. Korean ABC report (2002) (http://www.kabc.or.kr/) [written in Korean].
11. http://www.mediatoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=82278 [written in Korean].
12. D. Tewksbury and D.A. Scheufele (2009), News framing theory and research, in J. Bryant and M.B. Oliver eds., Media effects: Advances in theory and research, Routledge, New York U.S.A.
13. C. Baden (2010) Communication, Contextualization and Cognition: Patterns and Processes of Frames' Influence on People's Interpretations of the EU Constitution, PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, The Neatherland.
14. N. Crossley and J.M. Roberts eds. (2004), After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere, Blackwell, Oxford U.K.
15. K. Carley and M. Palmquist (1992), Extracting, Representing, and Analyzing Mental Models, Social Forces 70(3): 601-636.
16. CASOS (2007) Automap User's Guide, Carnegie Mellon University Press, Pittsburgh U.S.A. page 5-6.
17. See CASOS (2007).
18. C. Freeman (1979), Centrality in Networks: Conceptual Clarification, Social Networks 1:215-239.
19. L. Leydesdorff and I. Hellsten (2005), Metaphors and Diaphors in Science Communication: Mapping the Case of 'Stem-Cell Research, Science Communication 27(1): 64-99.
20. L. Leydesdoff and T. Schank (2008), Dynamic Animations of Journal Maps: Indicators of Structural Changes and Interdisciplinary Developments, Journal of the American Society for Informaiton Science and Technology 59(1).
21. The betweenness centrality of node v in a network is defined as: Across all node pairs that have a shortest path containing v, the percentage that pass through v. The formular is: Then Betweenness Centrality of node v = between/((n-1)(n-2)/2).
22. R. Barthes (1967), Elements of Semiology, trans. A. Laver and C. Smith, Jonathan Cape Ltd, New York U.S.A.
23. P. Bonacich (1987), Power and Centrality: A family of measures, The American Journal of Sociology 92(1): 1170-1182.
24. The formaula is: Let A = adjacency representation of the network N. Then Bonacich Power Centrality for the network is the solution c to the following system of linear equations: (I - ?A)c = Ae.
25. see S. Jasanoff (2005), Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, New York, Princeton University Press.
26. Y. Won et al. (2006), Fall of Myth, Phantom of National Interest, [in Korean] Seoul: Hannarae.
27. J. Kitzinger (2008), Questioning Hype, Rescuing Hope?: the Hwang Stem Cell Scandal and the Reassertion of Hopeful Horizons, Science as Culture 17(4).