Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows

Cambridge Journal of Education

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 287-302

  Berliner, David ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

assessment; curriculum; elementary education; testing; thinking skills

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860722814     PISSN: 0305764X     EISSN: 14693577     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alexander, R.J. 2010. Children, their world, their education, London: Routledge.
2. Amrein, A.L., & Berliner, D.C. (2002). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Retrieved June 24, 2010, fromhttp://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18/
3. Amrein-Beardsley, A., Berliner, D.C., & Rideau, S. (2010). Breaking professional law: Degrees of cheating on high stakes tests. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18(14). Retrieved June 24, 2010, fromhttp://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/714
4. Baker, M. (2002). 'Silent erosion' of school curriculum. Retrieved June 24, 2010, fromhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/1991816.stm
5. Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, L., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., Liu, Q., Ding, L., Cui, L., Luo, Y., Wang, Y., Li, L. and Wu, N. 2009. Physics: Learning and scientific reasoning. Science, 323(5914): 586-587.
6. Berliner, D.C. (2006). Our impoverished view of educational reform. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 949-995. Retrieved June 24, 2010, fromhttp://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=12106
7. Berliner, D.C. (2009). Poverty and potential. Out-of-school factors and school success. Boulder, CO and Tempe, AZ: Education and the Public Interest Center, University of Colorado/ Education Policy Research Unit, Arizona State University. Retrieved June 10, 2009, fromhttp://epicpolicy.org/publication/poverty-and-potential
8. Berliner, D.C. (2010). New analysis of achievement gap: 1/2 x 1/2 = 11/2. Washington Post. Retrieved June 29, 2010, fromhttp://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/guest-bloggers/new-analysis-of-achievement-ga.html?wprss=answer-sheet
9. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L. and Cocking, R.R. 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Committee on developments in the science of learning, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Braun, H., Chapman, L., & Vezzu, S. (2010). The Black-White achievement gap revisited. Education Policy Analysis Archive, 18(21). Retrieved February 14, 2011, fromhttp://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/772
11. Campbell, D.T. 1975. "Assessing the impact of planned social change". In Social research and public policies: The Dartmouth/OECD Conference, Edited by: Lyons, G. 3-45. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College, The Public Affairs Center.
12. Chudowsky, N., Chudowsky, V., & Kober, N. (2009). State test score trends through 2007-2008: Are achievement gaps closing and is achievement rising for all? Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy. Retrieved June 30, 2010, fromhttp://www.cep-dc.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=document_ext.showDocumentByID&nodeID=1&DocumentID=292
13. Darling-Hammond, L., Barron, B., Pearson, D., Schoenfeld, A.H., Stage, E.K., Zimmerman, T.D., Cervetti, G.N. and Tilson, J.L. 2009. Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Dietz, S. (2010). How many schools have not made adequate yearly progress under the No Child Left Behind Act? Washington, DC: Center for Educational Policy. Retrieved June 24, 2010, fromhttp://www.cep-dc.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=document_ext.showDocumentByID&nodeID=1&DocumentID=303
15. Duncan, A. (2011). Winning the future with education: Responsibility, reform and results. Oral testimony of US Secretary of Education Arne Duncan given to the US Congress, March 9, 2011. Retrieved June 20, 2011, fromhttp://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/winning-future-education-responsibility-reform-and-results
16. Finn, C.E., & Ravitch, D. (2007). Not by geeks alone. The Education Gadfly, 7, 30. Retrieved June 15, 2010, from http://www.edexcellence.net/gadfly/index.cfm?issue=302/1a3539 See also: The Wall Street Journal, Commentary, August 8, 2007, page A13.
17. Galton, M. 2007. Learning and teaching in the primary classroom, London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
18. Galton, M. and MacBeath, J. 2002. A life in teaching? The impact of change on primary teachers' working lives, London: National Union of Teachers.
19. Harlen, W. 2007. Assessment of learning, London: Sage.
20. Hirsch, E.D. Jr. 2003. Reading comprehension requires knowledge - of words and the world. American Educator, 27(1): 17
21. Hirsch, E.D. Jr. 2006. The knowledge deficit, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
22. Hong, W.-P., & Youngs, P. (2008). Does high stakes testing increase cultural capital among low-income and racial minority students? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 16(6). Retrieved January 14, 2009, fromhttp://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v16n6/
23. Jerald, C.D. (2006). The hidden costs of curriculum narrowing. Washington, DC: Learning Point Associates Issue Brief. The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement. Retrieved June 24, 2010, fromhttp://www.centerforcsri.org/files/CenterIssueBriefAug06.pdf
24. Jones, B., & Egley, R. (2004). Voices from the frontlines: Teachers' perceptions of high stakes testing, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(39). Retrieved June 15, 2009, fromhttp://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n39
25. Lee, J. 2008. Is test driven accountability effective? Synthesizing the evidence from cross-state causal-comparative and correlational studies. Review of Educational Research, 78(30): 608-644.
26. Lipman, P. 2004. High-stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform, New York: Routledge Palmer.
27. McMurrer, J. (2008). Instructional time in elementary school subjects. A closer look at changes for specific subjects. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy. Retrieved May 15, 2010, fromhttp://www.cep-dc.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=document.showDocumentByID&nodeID=1&DocumentID=234
28. McNeil, L. 2000. Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing, New York: Routledge.
29. National Center for Education Statistics. (2009a). The nation's report card: Mathematics 2009 (NCES 2010-451). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. Retreived June 24, 2010, fromhttp://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2009/2010451.asp
30. National Center for Education Statistics. (2009b). The nation's report card: Reading 2009 (NCES 2010-458). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. Retrieved June 24, 2010, fromhttp://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2009/2010458.pdf
31. Nichols, S.N. and Berliner, D.C. 2007. Collateral damage: The effects of high stakes testing on America's schools, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
32. Orlinsky, K. (2010). In law schools, grades go up, just like that. New York Times. Retrieved June 24, 2010, fromhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/22/business/22law.html?th
33. Resnick, L.B. 2010. Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39(3): 183-197.
34. Sahlberg, P. 2011. Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland, New York: Teachers College Press.
35. Schiesel, S. (2009). Former Justice promotes web-based civics lessons. New York Times. Retrieved June 24, 2010, fromhttp://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/09/arts/09sand.html
36. Smith, M.S. (2007). NAEP 2007-What about NCLB? Powerpoint presentation made by Marshall S. Smith at Berkeley, CA, October 10, 2007, cited with permission of the author.
37. Srikantaiah, D., Zhang, Y., & Swayhoover, L. (2008). Summary: Lessons from the classroom level: Federal and state accountability in Illinois. Washington, DC: Center for Educational Policy. Retrieved May 20, 2010, fromhttp://www.cep-dc.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=document_ext.showDocumentByID&nodeID=1&DocumentID=250
38. Taylor, G., Shepard, L., Kinner, F., & Rosenthal, J. (2003). A survey of teachers' perspectives on high stakes testing in Colorado: What gets taught, what gets lost. CSE Technical Report 588. Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
39. Willingham, D. (2009). Reading is not a skill - and why this is a problem for the draft national standards. Washington Post. Retrieved June 24, 2010, fromhttp://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/daniel-willingham/willingham-reading-is-not-a-sk.html
40. Woodworth, K.R., Gallagher, H.A., & Guha, R. (2007). An unfinished canvas. Arts education in California: Taking stock of policies and practices. Summary Report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved January 14, 2009, fromhttp://policyweb.sri.com/cep/publications/AnUnfinishedCanvasSummaryReport.pdf
41. Wright, W.E. Impact of high stakes testing policies on English language learners in Arizona. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Education Research Association. Chicago, IL. April.