Searching for quality microblog posts: Filtering and ranking based on content analysis and implicit links

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7238 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2012, Pages 397-413

  Vosecky, Jan ^a   Leung, Kenneth Wai Ting ^a   Ng, Wilfred ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMOUNT OF INFORMATION; BAG OF WORDS; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; COMPUTATIONAL TIME AND STORAGE; CONTENT ANALYSIS; CONTENT-BASED; CONTENT-BASED FEATURES; FEATURE SUBSET; MICRO-BLOG; MICROBLOGGING; QUALITY CONTENT; RANKING MODEL; SOCIAL INFORMATION; WEB ACTIVITIES;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84860698980     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29038-1_29     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. TwitterEngineering: 200 million tweets per day, http://blog.twitter.com/ 2011/06/200-million-tweets-per-day.html
2. Alonso, O., Carson, C., Gerster, D., Ji, X., Nabar, S.: Detecting Uninteresting Content in Text Streams. In: Proc. of SIGIR CSE Workshop (2010)
3. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., Tseng, B.: Why We Twitter: Understanding Microblogging Usage and Communities. In: Zhang, H., Spiliopoulou, M., Mobasher, B., Giles, C.L., McCallum, A., Nasraoui, O., Srivastava, J., Yen, J. (eds.) WebKDD 2007. LNCS, vol. 5439, pp. 118-138. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
4. Zhao, D., Rosson, M.B.: How and why people twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. In: Proc. of GROUP (2009)
5. Sriram, B., Fuhry, D., Demir, E., Ferhatosmanoglu, H., Demirbas, M.: Short text classification in twitter to improve information filtering. In: Proc. of SIGIR Conference (2010)
6. Ramage, D., Dumais, S.T., Liebling, D.J.: Characterizing microblogs with topic models. In: Proc. of ICWSM Conference (2010)
7. Lauw, H., Ntoulas, A., Kenthapadi, K.: Estimating the quality of postings in the real-time web. In: Proc. of SSM Conference (2010)
8. Nagmoti, R., Teredesai, A., De Cock, M.: Ranking approaches for microblog search. In: Proc. of WI-IAT Conference (2010)
9. Trifan, M., Ionescu, D.: A new search method for ranking short text messages using semantic features and cluster coherence. In: Proc. of ICCC-CONTI (2010)
10. Sarma, A.D., Sarma, A. D., Gollapudi, S., Panigrahy, R.: Ranking mechanisms in twitter-like forums. In: Proc. of WSDM Conference (2010)
11. Duan, Y., Jiang, L., Qin, T., Zhou, M., Shum, H.-Y.: An empirical study on learning to rank of tweets. In: Proc. of COLING Conference (2010)
12. Grove, J.V.: Twitter attempts to personalize 1.6 billion search queries per day, http://mashable.com/2011/06/01/twitter-search-queries/
13. Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C., Singer, Y.: Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In: Proc. of HLT-NAACL (2003)
14. Lahiri, S., Mitra, P., Lu, X.: Informality Judgment at Sentence Level and Experiments with Formality Score. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6609, pp. 446-457. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
15. Finkel, J.R., Grenager, T., Manning, C.: Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by gibbs sampling. In: Proc. of ACL (2005)
16. Joachims, T.: Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In: Proc. of ACM SIGKDD Conference (2002)
17. Cheng, Z., Caverlee, J., Lee, K.: You are where you tweet: a content-based approach to geo-locating twitter users. In: Proc. of CIKM Conference (2010)
18. Kohavi, R., John, G.H.: Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artificial Intelligence 97, 273-324 (1997)