Planning with Things

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 182-190

  Beauregard, Robert A ^a  

^a Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

deliberation; nonhuman things; planning theory; practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860672472     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X11435415     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Beauregard R.Site matters. Burns C. J.Kahn A., ed. New York: Routledge; 2005:39-58.
2. Beauregard R.Time, action, space.Urban Geography. 2011;32:470-75.
3. Bibby P.,Shepherd J.GIS, land use, and representation.Environment and Planning B. 2000;27:583-98.
4. Black A.The Chicago area transportation study: A case study of rational planning.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1990;10 (1): 27-37.
5. Bourdieu P.The social structures of the economy. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2005:.
6. Callon M.Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practice. Law J.Mol A., ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2002:191-217.
7. Callon M.,Latour B.Advances in social theory and methodology. Knorr-Cetina K.Cicourel A. V., ed. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1981:277-303.
8. Dalton L.Preparing planners for the breadth of practice.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2007;73 (1): 35-48.
9. Daston L.Things that talk. Daston L., ed. New York: Zone Books; 2004:9-24.
10. Edensor T.Entangled agencies, material networks and repair in a building assemblage: The mutable stone of St. Ann's Church, Manchester.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2011;36 (2): 238-52.
11. Fainstein N. I.,Fainstein S. S.New debates in urban planning: The impact of Marxist theory.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1979;3 (3): 381-403.
12. Fainstein S. S.The egalitarian city: The restructuring of Amsterdam.International Planning Studies. 1997;2 (3): 295-314.
13. Fainstein S. S.The just city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2010:.
14. Flyvbjerg B.Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1998:.
15. Flyvbjerg B.Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001:.
16. Forester J.Forester J.Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1989:107-118.
17. Forester J.Explorations in planning theory. Mandelbaum S. J.Mazza L.Burchell R. W., ed. New Brunswick, NJ: CUPR Press; 1996:241-62.
18. Forester J.The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999:.
19. Forester J.Dealing with differences: Dramas of mediating public disputes. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009:.
20. Friedmann J.,Hudson B.Knowledge and action: A guide to planning theory.Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 1974;40 (1): 2-16.
21. Giddens A.Profiles and critiques in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1982:.
22. Gieryn T.City as truth-spot: Laboratories and field sites in urban studies.Social Studies of Science. 2006;36 (1): 5-38.
23. Harman G.Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics. Melbourne: r.e.press; 2009:.
24. Hoch C.The paradox of power in planning practice.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1992;11:206-15.
25. Hoch C.Explorations in planning theory. Mandelbaum S. J.Mazza L.Burchell R. W., ed. New Brunswick, NJ: CUPR Press; 1996:225-40.
26. Hommels A.Unbuilding cities: Obduracy in urban sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2008:.
27. Innes J.,Booher D.Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century.Planning Theory & Practice. 2004;5 (4): 419-36.
28. Joerges B.Do politics have artefacts?.Social Studies of Science. 1999;29 (3): 411-31.
29. Jubien M.Thinking about things.Philosophical Perspectives. 2001;15:1-15.
30. Latour B.Shaping technology/building society. Bijker W. E.Law J., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1992:225-58.
31. Latour B.Reassembling the social. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:.
32. Latour B.,Yaneva A.Explorations in architecture. Geiser R., ed. Basel: Birkhauser; 2008:80-99.
33. Lehtonen T-K.The materiality of res publica. Colas D.Kharkhordin O., ed. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars; 2009:271-88.
34. Marcuse P.From critical theory to the right to the city.City. 2009;13 (2-3): 185-97.
35. Mitchell W. J.Placing words: Symbols, space, and the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005:.
36. Murdoch J.The spaces of actor-network theory.Geoforum. 1998;29 (4): 357-74.
37. Murdoch J.Post-structural geography: A guide to relational space. London: Sage; 2006:.
38. Pressman J.,Wildavsky A.Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1973:.
39. Sandercock L.Towards cosmopolis. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1998:.
40. Sandercock L.Spirituality and the urban professions: The paradox at the heart of planning.Planning Theory & Practice. 2007;2 (1): 65-67.
41. Schon D. A.Some of what a planner knows.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1982;48 (3): 351-64.
42. Scott J.Seeing like a state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1998:.
43. Tait M.,While A.Ontology and the conservation of built heritage.Environment and Planning D. 2009;27 (4): 721-37.
44. Thrift N.Spatial formations. London: Sage; 1996:.
45. Throgmorton J. A.On the virtues of skillful meandering.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2000;66 (4): 367-79.
46. Winner L.Do artefacts have politics?.Daedulus. 1980;109:121-36.