Which image is in awareness during binocular rivalry? Reading perceptual status from eye movements

Journal of Vision

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1-11

  Hayashi, Ryusuke ^a,b,c   Tanifuji, Manabu ^a  

^a RIKEN BRAIN SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^c JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; Eye movements; Optokinetic nystagmus; Visual awareness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; OPTOKINETIC NYSTAGMUS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

ADULT; ANIMALS; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; CUES; EYE MOVEMENTS; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; NYSTAGMUS, OPTOKINETIC; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 84860667557     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/12.3.5     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. R. (1985). Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 284-299.
2. Andrews, T. J., & Blakemore, C. (1999). Form and motion have independent access to consciousness. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 405-406.
3. Baizer, J. S., Ungerleider, L. G., & Desimone, R. (1991). Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 168-190.
4. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13-21.
5. Blake, R., O'Shea, R. P., & Mueller, T. J. (1992). Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision. Visual Neuroscience, 8, 469-478.
6. Boussaoud, D., Ungerleider, L. G., & Desimone, R. (1990). Pathways for motion analysis: Cortical connections of the medial superior temporal and fundus of the superior temporal visual areas in the macaque. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 296, 462-495.
7. Braddick, O. (1996). Where is the naso-temporal asymmetry? Motion processing. Current Biology, 6, 250-253.
8. Carney, T., & Shadlen, M. N. (1993). Dichoptic activation of the early motion system. Vision Research, 33, 1977-1995.
9. Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1998). Consciousness and neuroscience. Cerebral Cortex, 8, 97-107.
10. Distler, C., Boussaoud, D., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1993). Cortical connections of inferior temporal area TEO in macaque monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 334, 125-150.
11. Enoksson, P. (1963). Binocular rivalry and monocular dominance studied with optokinetic nystagmus. Acta Ophthalmologica (Copenhagen), 41, 544-563.
12. Fox, R., Todd, S., & Bettinger, L. A. (1975). Optokinetic nystagmus as an objective indicator of binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 15, 849-853.
13. Freiwald, W. A., Tsao, D. Y., & Livingstone, M. S. (2009). A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 1187-1196.
14. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25.
15. Hayashi, R., Miura, K., Tabata, H., & Kawano, K. (2008). Eye movements in response to dichoptic motion: Evidence for a parallel-hierarchical structure of visual motion processing in primates. Journal of Neurophysiology, 99, 2329-2346.
16. Hayashi, R., Nishida, S., Tolias, A., & Logothetis, N. K. (2007). A method for generating a "purely first-order" dichoptic motion stimulus. Journal of Vision, 7(8):7, 1-10, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/8/7, doi:10.1167/7.8.7
17. Hayashi, R., Sugita, Y., Nishida, S., & Kawano, K. (2009). How motion signals are integrated across frequencies: Study on motion perception and ocular following responses using multiple-slit stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103, 230-243.
18. Haynes, J. D., Deichmann, R., & Rees, G. (2005). Eyespecific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature, 438, 496-499.
19. Hoffmann, K. P. (1981). Neural responses related to optokinetic nystagmus in the cat's nucleus of the optic tract. In A. Fuchs & W. Becker (Eds.), Progress in oculomotor research (pp. 443-454). New York: Elsevier.
20. Jiang, Y., Costello, P., & He, S. (2007). Processing of invisible stimuli: Advantage of upright faces and recognizable words in overcoming interocular suppression. Psychological Science, 18, 349-355.
21. Kanwisher, N., Tong, F., & Nakayama, K. (1998). The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area. Cognition, 68, B1-B11.
22. Kreiman, G., Fried, I., & Koch, C. (2002). Singleneuron correlates of subjective vision in the human medial temporal lobe. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 8378-8383
23. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature, 379, 549-553.
24. Leopold, D. A., Maier, A., & Logothetis, N. K. (2003). Measuring subjective visual perception in the nonhuman primate. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 115-130.
25. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature, 412, 150-157.
26. Logothetis, N. K., & Schall, J. D. (1990). Binocular motion rivalry in macaque monkeys: Eye dominance and tracking eye movements. Vision Research, 30, 1409-1419.
27. Lu, Z. L., & Sperling, G. (2001). Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: Review and update. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 18, 2331-2370.
28. Lumer, E. D., Friston, K. J., & Rees, G. (1998). Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science, 280, 1930-1934.
29. Maier, A., Wilke, M., Aura, C., Zhu, C., Ye, F. Q., & Leopold, D. A. (2008). Divergence of fMRI and neural signals in V1 during perceptual suppression in the awake monkey. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1193-1200.
30. Maunsell, J. H., & van Essen, D. C. (1983). The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience, 3, 2563-2586.
31. Niemann, T., Ilg, U. J., & Hoffmann, K. P. (1994). Eye movements elicited by transparent stimuli. Experimental Brain Research, 98, 314-322.
32. O'Shea, R. P., Sims, A. J., & Govan, D. G. (1997). The effect of spatial frequency and field size on the spread of exclusive visibility in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 37, 175-183.
33. Polonsky, A., Blake, R., Braun, J., & Heeger, D. J. (2000). Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1153-1159.
34. Qian, N., Andersen, R. A., & Adelson, E. H. (1994). Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals: I. Psychophysics. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 7357-7366.
35. Ramachandran, V. S., Armel, C., Foster, C., & Stoddard, R. (1998). Object recognition can drive motion perception. Nature, 395, 852-853.
36. Schor, C., & Narayan, V. (1981). The influence of field size upon the spatial frequency response of optokinetic nystagmus. Vision Research, 21, 985-994.
37. Shadlen, M., & Carney, T. (1986). Mechanisms of human motion perception revealed by a new cyclopean illusion. Science, 232, 95-97.
38. Sheinberg, D. L., & Logothetis, N. K. (1997). The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 3408-3413.
39. Spering, M., Pomplun, M., & Carrasco, M. (2010). Tracking without perceiving: A dissociation between eye movements and motion perception. Psychological Science, 22, 216-225.
40. Stromeyer, C. F., 3rd, Kronauer, R. E., Madsen, J. C., & Klein, S. A. (1984). Opponent-movement mechanisms in human vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1, 876-884.
41. Tong, F., & Engel, S. A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature, 411, 195-199.
42. Tong, F., Meng, M., & Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 502-511.
43. Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neurons, 21, 753-759.
44. Troje, N. F., & Bulthoff, H. H. (1996). Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761-1771.
45. Ungerleider, L. G., & Desimone, R. (1986). Cortical connections of visual area MT in the macaque. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 248, 190-222.
46. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual system. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Ungerleider, L. G., & Pasternak, T. (2003). Ventral and dorsal cortical processing streams. In L. M. Chalupa & J. S. Werner (Eds.), Visual neuroscience (vol. 1, pp. 541-562). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Watanabe, K. (1999). Optokinetic nystagmus with spontaneous reversal of transparent motion perception. Experimental Brain Research, 129, 156-160.
49. Watson, A. B., & Ahumada, A. J., Jr. (1985). Model of human visual-motion sensing. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 322-341.
50. Wei, M., & Sun, F. (1998). The alternation of optokinetic responses driven by moving stimuli in humans. Brain Research, 813, 406-410.
51. Wunderlich, K., Schneider, K. A., & Kastner, S. (2005). Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1595-1602.
52. Yu, K., & Blake, R. (1992). Do recognizable figures enjoy an advantage in binocular rivalry? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1158-1173.