Mind the (Mobilization) Gap: Comparing Climate Activism in the United States and European Union

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 408-430

  Bomberg, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Activism; Advocacy; Climate change; European Union; Mobilization; Multilevel; Networks; United States

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; MITIGATION; MODELING; STAKEHOLDER;

EUROPE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84860607881     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: 15411338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00566.x     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Andersen, M. S., & Liefferink, D. (Eds.). (1997). European environmental policy: The pioneers. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
2. Barroso, J. M. (2008). Boosting growth and jobs by meeting our climate change commitments. Press release. Retrieved from
3. Baumgartner, R., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. Benford, R. (1993). "You could be the hundredth monkey": Collective action frames and vocabularies of motive within the nuclear disarmament movement. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(2), 195-216.
5. Bomberg, E. (2009). Governance for sustainable development: The US and EU compared. In M. Schreurs, H. Selin, & S. VanDeveer (Eds.), Transatlantic environmental and energy politics (pp. 21-40). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
6. Bomberg, E. (2012). Moving beyond the impasse: Climate change activism in the US and EU. In J. Meadowcroft, O. Langhelle, & A. Ruud (Eds.), Democracy, governance and sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
7. Bomberg, E., Peterson, J., & Corbett, S. (Eds.). (2012). The European Union. How does it work? (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Bomberg, E., & Super, B. (2009). The 2008 US presidential election: Obama and the environment. Environmental Politics, 18(3), 424-439.
9. Borick, C. (2010). American public opinion and climate change. In B. Rabe (Ed.), Greenhouse governance: Addressing climate change in America (pp. 250-259). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
10. Bosso, C. (2005). Environment Inc.: From grassroots to beltway. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
11. Boykoff, M., & Boykoff, J. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38(6), 1190-1204.
12. Brick, P., & Cawley, M. (2008). Producing political climate change: The hidden life of US environmentalism. Environmental Politics, 17(2), 200-218.
13. Bryner, G. (2008). Failure and opportunity: Environmental groups in us climate change policy. Environmental Politics, 17(2), 319-336.
14. Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2003). Cities and climate change: Urban sustainability and global environmental governance. London: Routledge.
15. Bulkeley, H., & Newell, P. (2010). Governing climate change. London: Routledge.
16. CAN Europe (Climate Action Network Europe). (2011). A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. Presented at the European Commission Stakeholder conference, 17th March, Brussels. Retrieved from
17. Cart, J. (2011, October 21). California become first state to adopt cap-and-trade program. Los Angeles Times, p. 17.
18. Christie, C. (2011). New Jersey's future is green. Press Release, Retrieved from
19. Corbett, R., & Watson, R. (2012). How policies are made. In E. Bomberg, Peterson, J., & Corbett, S. (Eds.), The European Union. How does it work? (3rd ed.; pp. 122-140). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Covenant of Mayors. (2010). Homepage. Retrieved from
21. Daviter, F. (2007). Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(4), 654-666.
22. Della Porta, D., & Caiani, M. (2009). Social movements and Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social movements. An introduction (2nd ed.). London: Wiley-Blackwell.
24. Derthick, M. (2010). Compensatory federalism. In B. Rabe (Ed.), Greenhouse governance: Addressing climate change in America (pp. 58-72). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
25. Di Chiro, G. (2008). Living environmentalisms: Coalition politics, social reproduction and environmental justice. Environmental Politics, 17(2), 276-298.
26. Dunlap, R., & McCright, A. (2008). A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment Magazine, Sept/October, 1-17.
27. Engel, K. (2009). Whither subnational climate change initiatives in the wake of federal climate legislation? Publius, 39(3), 432-454.
28. Engel, K., & Saleska, S. (2005). Subglobal regulation of the global commons. Ecology Law Quarterly, 32(2), 183-233.
29. European Commission. (2011a). Emissions trading system. DG Climate Action. Retrieved from
30. European Commission. (2011b). Roadmap for moving to a low-carbon economy in 2050. DG Climate Action. Retrieved from
31. FoE (Friends of the Earth US). (2010). The path to an international climate agreement in Copenhagen. Retrieved from
32. Friedman, T. (2008). Hot, flat and crowded: Why we need a green revolution-and how it can renew America. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
33. Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Oxford: Polity Press.
34. Gore, C. (2010). The limits and opportunities of networks: Municipalities and Canadian climate change policy. Review of Policy Research, 27(1), 27-46.
35. Harrison, K., & Sundstrom, L. M. (2007). The comparative politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 7(4), 1-18.
36. Harvey, F. (2011, November 21). Rich nations "give up" on new climate treaty until 2020. The Guardian, p. 21.
37. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unravelling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233-243.
38. Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., & Berkhout, F. (Eds.). (2010). Climate change policy in the European Union. Confronting the dilemmas of mitigation and adaptation? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders. Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
40. Keleman, D., & Vogel, D. (2010). Trading places: The role of the United States and the European Union in international environmental politics. Comparative Political Studies, 43(4), 427-456.
41. Kern, K., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Cities, Europeanization and multi-level governance: Governing climate change through transnational networks. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 309-332.
42. Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Blackwell.
43. Kolbert, E. (2009). The political scene: Greening the ghetto. New Yorker. 12 Jan. Retrieved from
44. Lachapelle, E., Borick, C. P., & Rabe, B. (2012). Public attitudes toward climate science and climate policy in federal systems: Canada and the United States compared. Review of Policy Research, 29(3), 335-358.
45. Lafferty, W. (2004). From environmental protection to sustainable development: The challenge of decoupling through sectoral integration. In W. Lafferty (Ed.), Governance for sustainable development. The challenge of adapting form to function (pp. 191-220). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
46. Levy, D. (2011). Private sector governance for a sustainable economy: A strategic approach. Review of Policy Research, 28(5), 487-493.
47. Marsh, D. (Ed.). (1998). Comparing policy networks. Buckingham: Open University Press.
48. Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992). Policy networks in British government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
49. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures and cultural framings. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
50. McEwen, N., Bomberg, E., & Swenden, W. (2010). Pushing at boundaries of devolution: Energy and climate change policy in Scotland. Paper presented to the PSA specialist group on British and Comparative Territorial Politics, University of Oxford, 7-8 January. Retrieved from
51. McKibben, B. (2010). Earth. Making a life on a tough new planet. New York, NY: Times Books.
52. Meyer, J. (2009). Populism, paternalism and the state of environmentalism in the US. In E. Bomberg & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), Environmentalism in the United States (pp. 33-50). London: Routledge.
53. Miller, C. (2000). The dynamics of framing environmental values and policy: Four models of societal processes. Environmental Values, 9, 211-233.
54. Moser, S. (2007). In the long shadows of inaction: The quiet building of a climate protection movement in the United States. Global Environmental Politics, 7(2), 124-144.
55. Moser, S. (2009). Communicating climate change and motivating civic action: Renewing, activating and building democracies. In H. Selin & S. VanDeveer (Eds.), Changing climates and institution building across the continent (pp. 283-302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. New Evangelical Partnership for the Common Good. (2011). Creation care. Retrieved from
57. Newport, F. (2011). Americans' global warming concerns continue to drop. Gallup, Inc. Retrieved from
58. Nivola, P., & Jones, C. O. (2008). "Change" or plus ça change...? Pondering presidential politics and policy after Bush. Brookings Issues in Governance Studies, Article 20. Retrieved from
59. Oberthür, S., & Pallemaerts, M. (Eds.). (2010). The new climate policies of the European Union. Brussels: VUB Press.
60. Peterson, J. (2009). Policy networks. In A. Wiener & T. Dietz (Eds.), European integration theory (2nd ed.; pp. 105-124). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Peterson, J., & Shackleton, M. (Eds.). (2012). The institutions of the European Union (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Peterson, J., & O'Toole, Jr., L. (2001). Federal governance in the US and the EU: A policy network perspective. In K. Nicolaïdis & R. Howse (Eds.), The federal vision: Legitimacy and levels of governance in the US and EU (pp. 300-374). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Pew Research Center for the People and Press. (2009). Global warming seen as a major problem around the world. Pew global attitudes survey, 2 Dec. Retrieved from
64. Poloni-Staudinger, L. (2008). The domestic opportunity structure and supranational activity. European Union Politics, 9(4), 531-558.
65. Posner, P. (2010). The politics of vertical diffusion: The states and climate change. In B. Rabe (Ed.), Greenhouse governance: Addressing climate change in America (pp. 73-98). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
66. Pralle, S., & Boscarino, J. (2011). Framing trade-offs: The politics of nuclear power and wind energy in the age of global climate change. Review of Policy Research, 28, 323-346.
67. Rabe, B. (2007). Environmental policy and the Bush era: The collision between the administrative presidency and state experimentation. Publius, 37, 413-431.
68. Rabe, B. (2008). States on steroids: The intergovernmental odyssey of American climate change policy. Review of Policy Research, 25(2), 105-128.
69. Rabe, B. (2009). Second-generation climate policies in states: Proliferation, diffusion, and regionalization. In H. Selin & S. VanDeveer (Eds.), Changing climates and institution building across the continent (pp. 67-86). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Rabe, B. (Ed.) (2010). Greenhouse governance. Addressing climate change in America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
71. Rabe, B. (2011). Contested federalism and American climate policy. Publius, 41(3), 1-28.
72. Rabe, B., & Borick, C. P. (2012). Carbon taxation and policy labeling: Experience from American states and Canadian provinces. Review of Policy Research, 29(3), 359-383.
73. Rootes, C. (2007). The transformation of environmental activism: An introduction. In C. Rootes (Ed.), Environmental protest in Western Europe (2nd ed.; pp. 1-19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74. Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98-130.
75. Scharpf, F. (1988). The joint-decision trap: Lesson from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66(3), 239-278.
76. Schlosberg, D., & Bomberg, E. (2008). Perspectives on American environmentalism. Environmental Politics, 17(2), 187-199.
77. Schreurs, M., & Tiberghien, Y. (2007). Multi-level reinforcement: Explaining European Union leadership in climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 7(4), 19-46.
78. Schreurs, M., Selin, H., & VanDeveer, S. (2009). Conflict and cooperation in transatlantic climate politics: Different stores and different levels. In M. Schreurs, H. Selin, & S. VanDeveer (Eds.), Transatlantic environmental and energy politics (pp. 165-188). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
79. Selin, H., & VanDeveer, S. (Eds.). (2009). Changing climates and institution building across the continent. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
80. Sine, W., & Lee, B. (2009). Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and emergence of the U.S. wind energy sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 123-155.
81. Skjaerseth, J., & Wettestad, J. (2010). The EU's Emission Trading System Revised (Directive 2009/29/EC). In S. Oberthür and M. Pallemaerts (Eds.), The new climate policies of the European Union (pp. 65-92). Brussels: VUB Press.
82. Stephenson, W. (2010). Evangelicals are greener than you think. Grist magazine. 21 Dec. Retrieved from
83. Tarrow, S. (2006). The new transnational activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement. Social movement and contentious politics. Rev. Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. USCAN (US Climate Action Network). (2010a). Achievements (About us home page). Retrieved from
86. USCAN (US Climate Action Network). (2010b). Dirty air act vote tests senate's direction on climate, clean energy. Retrieved from
87. van Asselt, H. (2010). Emissions trading: The enthusiastic adoption of an alien instrument? In A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, T. Rayner, & F. Berkhout (Eds.), Climate change policy in the European Union. Confronting the dilemmas of mitigation and adaptation? (pp. 125-144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
88. Vogler, J. (2009). Climate change and EU foreign policy: The negotiation of burden sharing. International Politics, 46(3), 469-490.
89. Walder, A. G. (2009). Political sociology and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(3), 393-412.
90. Wälti, S. (2009). Intergovernmental management of environmental policy in the United States and the EU. In M. Schreurs, H. Selin, & S. VanDeveer (Eds.), Transatlantic environmental and energy politics (pp. 41-54). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
91. Wapner, P. (2011). Civil society and the emergent Green economy. Review of Policy Research, 28(5), 525-530.
92. Wardekker, A., Petersen, A., & van der Sluijs, J. (2009). Ethics and public perception of climate change: Exploring the Christian voices in the US public debate. Global Environmental Change, 19(4), 512-521.
93. Weaver, R. K., & Rockman, A. (Eds.). (1993). Do institutions matter? Government capabilities in the United States and abroad. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
94. Wurzel, R. (2010). Environmental NGOs. Taking a lead? In R. Wurzel & J. Connelly (Eds.), The EU as a leader in international climate change politics (pp. 214-231). London: Routledge.