Comparative hazard assessment for protected species in a fire-prone landscape

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 277, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-10

  Roloff, Gary J ^a   Mealey, Stephen P ^b   Bailey, John D ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b 42112 Holden Creek Lane ^*  (United States)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative hazard assessment; Fire; Hazardous fuels management; Oregon; Risk analysis; Spotted owls

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE MANAGEMENT; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; CROWN FIRES; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FIELD EVALUATION; FIRE REGIMES; FIRE-PRONE AREA; FUELS MANAGEMENT; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; LAND OWNERSHIP; MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES; MODEL SIMULATION; OREGON; OREGON , USA; RISK AVERSE; SHORT TERM; SPOTTED OWLS; TIME-PERIODS; VEGETATION REGENERATION; YOUNG STANDS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FIRES; MANAGEMENT; RISK ANALYSIS;

FIRE HAZARDS;

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FIRE BEHAVIOR; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; LANDSCAPE; MATURATION; PROTECTED AREA; RAPTOR; REGENERATION; RISK FACTOR; TERRITORY;

OREGON; UNITED STATES;

STRIGIFORMES; STRIX OCCIDENTALIS CAURINA;

EID: 84860601229     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.015     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Agee J.K. Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests 1993, Island Press, Washington, DC.
2. Ager A.A., Finney M.A., Kerns B.K., Maffei H. Modeling wildfire risk to northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) habitat in central Oregon USA. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2007, 246:45-56.
3. Ager A.A., Vaillant N.M., Finney M.A. A comparison of landscape fuel treatment strategies to mitigate wildland fire risk in the urban interface and preserve old forest structure. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2010, 259:1556-1570.
4. Allen C.D., Macalady A.K., Chenchouni H., Bachelet D., McDowell N., Vennetier M., Kitzberger T., Rigling A., Breshears D.D., Hogg E.H., Gonzalez P., Fensham R., Zhang Z., Castro J., Demidova N., Lim J.-H., Allard G., Running S.W., Semerci A., Cobb N. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2010, 259:660-684.
5. Anderson, H.E., 1982. Aid to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-122. Ogden, UT, pp. 22.
6. Atzet, T., White, D.E., McCrimmon, L.A., Martinez, P.A., Fong, P.R., Randall, V.D., 1996. Field guide to forested plant associations of southwestern Oregon. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Technical Paper R6-NR-ECOL-TP-17-96.
7. Bailey J.D., Covington W.W. Evaluating ponderosa pine regeneration rates following ecological restoration treatments in northern Arizona, USA. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2002, 155:271-278.
8. Bond M.L., Gutiérrez R.J., Franklin A.B., LaHaye W.S., May C.A., Seamans M.E. Short-term effects of wildfires on spotted owl survival, site fidelity, mate fidelity, and reproductive success. Wildlife Soc. B 2002, 30:1022-1028.
9. Bond M.L., Lee D.E., Siegel R.B., Ward J.P. Habitat use and selection by California spotted owls in a postfire landscape. J. Wildlife Manage. 2009, 73:1116-1124.
10. Campbell, S., Liegel, L. (tech. coords.), 1996. Disturbance and forest health in Oregon and Washington. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-381. Portland, OR, pp. 121.
11. Courtney S.P., Blakesley J.A., Bigley R.E., Cody M.L., Dumbacher J.P., Fleischer R.C., Franklin A.B., Franklin J.F., Gutiérrez R.J., Marzluff J.M., Sztukowski L. Scientific Evaluation of the Status of the Northern Spotted Owl 2004, Sustainable Ecosystems Institute, Portland, OR, 508.
12. Fairbrother A., Turnley J.G. Predicting risks of uncharacteristic wildfires: application of the risk assessment process. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2005, 211:28-35.
13. Filip G.M., Maffei H., Chadwick K.L. Forest health decline in a central Oregon mixed-conifer forest revisited after wildfire: a 25-year case study. West. J. Appl. Forest. 2007, 22:278-284.
14. Finney, M.A., 2006. An overview of FlamMap fire modeling capabilities. In: Andrews, P.L., Butler, B.W. (comps), Fuels Management - How to Measure Success; Conference Proceedings. Portland, OR, March 28-30, 2006, pp. 213-220; Proceedings RMRS-P-41, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO., p. 809.
15. Finney M.A., Seli R.C., McHugh C.W., Ager A.A., Bahro B., Agee J.K. Simulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2007, 16:712-727.
16. Forsman E.D., Meslow E.C., Wight H.M. Distribution and biology of the spotted owl in Oregon. Wildlife Monogr. 1984, 87:1-64.
17. Franklin A.B., Anderson D.R., Gutierrez R.J., Burnham K.P. Climate, habitat quality, and fitness in northern spotted owl populations in northwestern California. Ecol. Monogr. 2000, 70:539-590.
18. Fulé, P.Z., McHugh, C., Heinlein, T.A., Covington, W.W., 2001. Potential fire behavior is reduced following forest restoration treatments. In: Vance, R.K., Edminster, C.B., Covington, W.W., Blake, J.A. (comps), Ponderosa Pine Ecosystems Restoration and Conservation: Steps Toward Stewardship; Conference Proceedings, April 25-27, 2000, Flagstaff, AZ, pp. 28-35; Proceedings RMRS-P-22, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO., p. 188.
19. Gaines, W.L., Strand, R.A., Piper, S.D., 1997. Effects of the hatchery complex fires on northern spotted owls in the eastern Washington Cascades. In: Greenlee, J.N. (Ed), Fire Effects on Rare and Endangered Species and Habitats; Conference Proceedings, November 13-16, 1995, Couer d'Alene, ID, pp. 123-129; Proceedings of the International Association of Wildfire and Forestry, Fairfield, WA, p. 343.
20. Gaines W.L., Harrod R.J., Dickinson J., Lyons A.L., Halupka K. Integration of northern spotted owl habitat and fuels treatments in the eastern Cascades, Washington, USA. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2010, 260:2045-2052.
21. Government Accountability Office [GAO], 2004. Wildlife Fires: Forest Service and BLM Need Better Information and a Systematic Approach for Assessing the Risks of Environmental Effects. GAO-04-705, Washington, DC.
22. Graham, R.T., McCaffrey, S., Jain, T.B. (Tech. Eds.), 2004. Science basis for changing forest structure to modify wildfire behavior and severity. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-120, Fort Collins, CO., p. 43.
23. HFRA, 2003. Healthy Forest Restoration Act of 2003. Public Law 108-148, Statutes at Large 117, 1887.
24. Hanson C.T., Odion D.C., Dellasala D.A., Baker W.L. Overestimation of fire risk in the northern spotted owl recovery plan. Conserv. Biol. 2009, 23:1314-1319.
25. Hanson C.T., Odion D.C., Dellasala D.A., Baker W.L. More comprehensive recovery actions for northern spotted owls in dry forests: reply to Spies et al. Conserv. Biol. 2009, 24:334-337.
26. Hayes, E.B., Sekavec, L., Quigley, T.M., 2008. Monitoring fuel treatments across the continental United States for overall effectiveness and effects on aquatic and terrestrial habitat, air and water quality, 2008 report. USDA Forest Service and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Washington, DC, p. 35.
27. Hummel S., Calkin D.E. Costs of landscape silviculture for fire and habitat management. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2005, 207:385-404.
28. Ince P.J., Spelter H., Skog K.E., Kramp A., Dykstra D.P. Market impacts of hypothetical fuel treatment thinning programs on federal lands in the western United States. Forest Policy Econ. 2008, 10:363-372.
29. Irwin L., Thomas J.W. Policy conflicts relative to managing fire-adapted forests on Federal lands: the case of the northern spotted owl. Fire in Oregon's Forests: Risks, Effects, and Treatment Options 2002, 96-107. Oregon Forest Resources Institute, Corvallis, OR. S. Fitzgerald (Ed.).
30. Irwin L.L., Rock D.F., Miller G.P. Stand structures used by northern spotted owls in managed forests. J. Raptor Res. 2000, 34:175-186.
31. Iverson, D.C., Alston, R.M., 1986. The genesis of FORPLAN: a historical and analytical review of Forest Service planning models. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station General Technical Report INT-214, Ogden, UT, p. 38.
32. Jenkins M.J., Hebertson E., Page W., Jorgensen C.A. Bark beetles, fuels, fires and implications for forest management in the Intermountain West. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2008, 254:16-34.
33. Kennedy R.S.H., Wimberly M.C. Historical fire and vegetation dynamics in dry forests of the interior Pacific Northwest, USA, and relationships to northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) habitat conservation. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2009, 258:554-566.
34. Keyser, C.E. (comp), 2008 . West Cascades (WC) variant overview. USDA Forest Service, Forest Management Service Center, Fort Collins, CO., p. 63.
35. Lint, J. (tech. coord.), 2005. Northwest Forest Plan-the first 10 years (1994-2003): status and trends of northern spotted owl populations and habitat. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report PNW-GTR-648, Portland, OR, p. 176.
36. Liu Y., Stanturf J., Goodrick S. Trends in global wildfire potential in a changing climate. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2010, 259:685-697.
37. MacCracken, J.G., Boyd, W.C., Rowe, B.S., 1996. Forest health and spotted owls in the eastern cascades of Washington. In: Wadsworth, G., McCabe, R.E. (Eds.), Facing Realities in Resource Management. Trans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 61, pp. 519-527.
38. McNab, W.H., Avers, P.E. (comp.), 1994. Ecological subregions of the United States: section descriptions. USDA Forest Service, Ecosystem Management, Washington, DC, WO-WSA-5, p. 267.
39. Mealey S.P., Thomas J.W. Uncharacteristic wildfire risk and fish conservation in Oregon. Fire in Oregon's Forests: Risks, Effects, and Treatment Options 2002, 85-95. Oregon Forest Resources Institute, Salem, OR. S.A. Fitzgerald (Ed.).
40. Mealey S.P., Roloff G.J. A comparative ecological risk assessment on northern spotted owls and fire. Transactions of the 75th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 2010, 52-59. Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, DC. R.E. McCabe, K.A. Stockwell (Eds.).
41. Mealey S.P., Thomas J.W., Salwasser H.W., Stewart R.E., Balint P.J., Adams P.W. Precaution in the American Endangered Species Act as a precursor to environmental decline: the case of the Northwest Forest Plan. Biodiversity and the Precautionary Principle: Risk and Uncertainty in Conservation and Sustainable Use 2005, 314. Earthscan, Sterling, VA. R. Cooney, B. Dickson (Eds.).
42. Morgan P., Hardy C.C., Swetnam T.W., Rollins M.G., Long D.G. Mapping fire regimes across time and space. Understanding coarse and fine-scale fire patterns. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2001, 10:329-342.
43. Moeur, M., 1985. COVER: A user's guide to the CANOPY and SHRUBS extension of the stand prognosis model. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station General Technical Report INT-190. Ogden, UT, p. 54.
44. Noon B.R., Blakesly J.A. Conservation of the northern spotted owl under the Northwest Forest Plan. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20:288-296.
45. O'Laughlin J. Conceptual model for comparative ecological risk assessment of wildfire effects on fish, with and without hazardous fuel treatment. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2005, 211:59-72.
46. Olson R.L., Sharpe P.J.H., Wu H. Whole plant modeling: a continuous-time Markov (CTM) approach. Ecol. Model. 1985, 29:171-187.
47. Prato T. Accounting for uncertainty in making species protection decisions. Conserv. Biol. 2005, 19:806-814.
48. Ravindran A., Phillips D.T., Solberg J.J. Operations Research: Principles and Practice 1987, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 656. second ed.
49. Rieman B., Clayton J. Wildfire and native fish: issues of forest health and conservation of sensitive species. Fisheries 1997, 22:6-15.
50. Rieman B., Lee D., Burns D., Gresswell R., Young M., Stowell R., Rinne J., Howell P. Status of native fishes in the western United States and issues for fire and fuels management. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2003, 178:197-211.
51. Rochelle J. Effects of wildfire on wildlife. Fire in Oregon's Forests: Risks, Effects, and Treatment Options 2002, 35-47. Oregon Forest Resources Institute, Corvallis, OR. S. Fitzgerald (Ed.).
52. Roloff G.J., Haufler J.B. Modeling habitat-based viability from organisms to population. Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Scale and Accuracy 2001, 673-685. Island Press, Washington, DC. J.M. Scott, P.J. Heglund, M.L. Morrison, J.B. Haufler, M.G. Raphael, W.A. Wall, F.B. Samson (Eds.).
53. Roloff G.J., Wilhere G.F., Quinn T., Kohlmann S. An overview of models and their role in wildlife management. Wildlife-habitat Relationships in Oregon and Washington 2001, 512-536. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR. D. Johnson, T. O'Neil (Eds.).
54. Roloff G.J., Mealey S.P., Clay C., Barry J., Yanish C., Neuenschwander L. A process for modeling short- and long-term risk in the southern Oregon Cascades. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2005, 211:166-190.
55. Roloff G.J., Mealey S.P., Clay C.L., Barry J. Evaluating risks associated with forest management scenarios in areas dominated by mixed severity fire regimes in southwest Oregon. Mixed Severity Fire Regimes: Ecology and Management 2005, 205-234. The Association for Fire Ecology and Washington State University, Pullman, WA. L. Taylor, J. Zelnik, S. Cadwaller, B. Hughes (Eds.).
56. Ruhl J.B. The battle over Endangered Species Act methodology. Environ. Law 2004, 34:555-603.
57. Schultz C. Responding to scientific uncertainty in US forest policy. Environ. Sci. Policy 2008, 11:253-271.
58. Schwilk D.W., Knapp E.E., Ferrenberg S.M., Keeley J.E., Caprio A.C. Tree mortality from fire and bark beetles following early and late season prescribed fires in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2006, 232:36-45.
59. Scott, J.H., Reinhardt, E.D., 2001. Assessing crown fire potential by linking models of surface and crown fire behavior. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Research Paper RMRS-RP-29, Fort Collins, CO., p. 59.
60. Seamans M.E., Gutiérrez R.J. Habitat selection in a changing environment: the relationship between habitat alteration and spotted owl territory occupancy and breeding dispersal. Condor 2007, 109:566-576.
61. Simard M., Romme W.H., Griffin J.M., Turner M.G. Do mountain pine beetle outbreaks change the probability of active crown fire in Lodgepole pine forests?. Ecol. Monogr. 2011, 81:3-24.
62. Society for Risk Analysis, 2012. Glossary. (accessed February 9, 2012). http://www.sra.org/resources_glossary_g-i.php.
63. South Cascades Late Successional Reserve Assessment, 1998. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, USDA Forest Service, and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Washington, DC, pp. 254 (+maps).
64. Spies T.A., Hemstrom M.A., Youngblood A., Hummel S. Conserving old-growth forest diversity in disturbance-prone landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20:351-362.
65. Starfield A.M. A pragmatic approach to modeling for wildlife management. J. Wildl. Manage. 1997, 61:261-270.
66. Stephens S.L., Finney M.A. Prescribed fire mortality of Sierra Nevada mixed conifer tree species: effects of crown damage and forest floor combustion. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2002, 162:261-271.
67. Stephens S.L., Moghaddas J.J., Edminster C., Fiedler C.E., Haase S., Harrington M., Keeley J.E., Knapp E.E., McIver J.D., Metlen K., Skinner C.N., Youngblood A. Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western US forests. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19:305-320.
68. Thompson J.R., Spies T.A., Olsen K.A. Canopy damage to conifer plantations within a large mixed-severity wildfire varies with stand age. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2011, 262:355-360.
69. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2011. Revised recovery plan for the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina). US Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR. xvi + pp. 258.
70. US-FWS and NOAA, 2003. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; guidance on streamlining Section 7 consultation on hazardous fuels treatment projects. Federal Register 68, 1628-1629. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/fr/fr68-1628.pdf.
71. US General Accounting Office, 2003. Forest Service. Information on Decisions Involving Fuels Reduction Activities. GAO-03-689R, Washington, DC.
72. Weatherspoon, C.P., Husari, S.J., van Wagtendonk, J.W., 1992. Fire and fuels management in relation to owl habitat in forests of the Sierra Nevada and southern California. In: Verner, J., McKelvey, K. S., Noon, B. R., Gutiérrez, R. J., Gould, G. I., Beck, T. W. (tech. coords.), The California Spotted Owl: A Technical Assessment of its Current Status. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station General Technical Report PSW-133, Albany, CA, pp. 247-260.
73. Westerling A.L., Hidalgo H.G., Cayan D.R., Swetnam T.W. Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 2006, 313:940-943.
74. Williams, S., Hogarth, W.T., 2002. Evaluating the net benefit of hazardous fuels treatment projects. Memorandum to Regional Directors, Region 1-7; Manager, California Nevada Operations; and Regional Administrators, NOAA Fisheries. United States Department of Interior and United States Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, p. 5.
75. Wright C.S., Agee J.K. Fire and vegetation history in the eastern Cascade Mountains, Washington. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14:443-459.
76. Wildavsky A. Trial and error versus trial without error. Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle 2000, 22-45. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, London. J. Morris (Ed.).
77. Yaffee S.L. Why environmental policy nightmares recur. Conserv. Biol. 1997, 11:328-337.
78. Zabel C.J., McKelvey K., Ward J.P. Influence of primary prey on home-range size and habitat-use patterns of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina). Can. J. Zool. 1995, 73:433-439.
79. Zabel C.J., Dunk J.R., Stauffer H.B., Roberts L.M., Mulder B.S., Wright A. Northern spotted owl habitat models for research and management application in California. Ecol. Appl. 2003, 13:1027-1040.