Using complex networks concepts to assess approaches for citations in scientific papers

Scientometrics

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 827-842

  Amancio, D R ^a   Nunes, M G V ^a   Oliveira Jr , O N ^a   da Costa, L F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Complex networks; Similarity network; Virtual scientometry

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860579330     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0630-z     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aires, R. V. X., Aluísio, S. M., Kuhn, D. C. S., Andreeta, M. L. B., & Oliveira, O. N., Jr. (2000). Combining multiple classifiers to improve part of speech tagging: A case study for Brazilian Portuguese. In Proceedings of the Brazilian AI symposium.
2. Albert, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 47-97.
3. Amancio, D. R., Antiqueira, L., Pardo, T. A. S., Costa, L. F., Oliveira, O. N., Jr., & Nunes, M. G. V. (2008). Complex networks analysis of manual and machine translations. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 19(4), 583-598.
4. Amancio, D. R., Nunes, M. G. V., Oliveira, O. N., Jr, Pardo, T. A. S., Antiqueira, L., & Costa, L. F. (2011). Using metrics from complex networks to evaluate machine translation. Physica A, 390, 131-142.
5. Antiqueira, L., Nunes, M. G. V., Oliveira, O. N, Jr., & Costa, L. F. (2005). Modeling texts as complex networks. In III STIL, Brazilian symposium in information and human language technology, São Leopoldo, RS, Brazil.
6. Antiqueira, L., Nunes, M. G. V., Oliveira, O. N., Jr., & Costa, L. F. (2007). Strong correlations between text quality and complex networks features. Physica A, 373, 811-820.
7. Antiqueira, L., Oliveira, O. N., Jr., Costa, L. F., & Nunes, M. G. V. (2009). A complex network approach to text summarization. Information Sciences, 179(5), 584-599.
8. Barabási, A.-L. (2009). Scale-free networks: A decade and beyond. Science, 24(325), 412-413.
9. Barbara, K. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. NICTA Technical Report 0400011T. 1.
10. Börner, K., Marus, J. T., & Goldstone, R. L. (2004). The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks. PNAS, 101(Suppl. 1), 5266-5273.
11. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? a review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64, 45-80.
12. Costa, L. F. (2004). What's in a name? International Journal of Modern Physics C, 15, 371-379.
13. Costa, L. F. (2006). On the dynamics of the h-index in complex networks with coexisting communities. arXiv: physics/0609116.
14. Cotta, C., & Merelo, J. J. (2005). The complex network of evolutionary computation authors: An initial study. arXiv: physics/0507196v2.
15. Cronin, B. (1982). Norms and functions in citation-The view of journal editors and referees in psychology. Social Science Information Studies, 2, 65-78.
16. De Mey, M. (1982). The cognitive paradigm. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Ferrer, I., Cancho, R., & Solé, R. V. (2001). The small world of human language. Proceedings: Biological Sciences/The Royal Society, 268(1482), 5-2261.
18. Ferrer, I., Cancho, R., Solé, R. V., & Köhler, R. (2004). Patterns in syntactic dependency networks. Physical Review E, 69(5), 1-8.
19. Gingras, Y., Larivière, V., & Archambault, É. (2009). Literature citations in the internet era. Science, 323(5910), 36.
20. Gross, P. L. K., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 385-389.
21. Hajra, K. B., & Sen, P. (2005). Aging in citation networks. Physica A, 346, 44-48.
22. Huang, S., Yu, Y., Xue, G.-R., Zhang, B.-Y., Chen, Z., & Ma, W.-Y. (2006). TSSP: Multi-features based reinforcement algorithm to find related papers. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems, 4(3), 271-287.
23. King, J. (1987). A review of bibliometric and other science indicator and their role in research evaluation. Journal of Information Science, 13, 261-276.
24. Lancaster, F. W., Lee, S.-Y. K., & Diluvio, C. (1990). Does the place of publication influence citation behavior? Scientometrics, 19(3-4), 239-244.
25. Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature 411, 521.
26. Lilien, G. L. (2008). The ombudsman: Who's at Fawlt at Fawlty Towers? Commentaries on the citation dilemma. Interfaces, 38, 123-124.
27. Liu, Y., Niculescu-Mizil, A., & Gryc, W. (2009). Topic-link LDA: Joint models of topic and author community. In ICML '09 proceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning.
28. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1997). Citation content analysis of a botany journal. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 48, 5-274.
29. Martins, W. S., Gonçalves, M. A., Laender, A. H. F., & Ziviani, N. (2010). Assessing the quality of scientific conferences based on bibliographic citations. Scientometrics, 83(1), 133-155.
30. May, K. O. (1967). Abuses of citation indexing. Science, 19(156), 890-892.
31. McClellan, J. E. (2003). Specialist control: The publications committee of the Academie Royal des Sciences. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 93, 1700-1793.
32. Meyn, S. P., & Tweedie, R. L. (2005). Markov chains and stochastic stability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
34. Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. Siam Review, 45(2), 167-256.
35. Nunes, M. G. V., et al. (1996). O Processo de Construção de um Léxico para o Português do Brasil: Lições Aprendidas e Perspectivas. In II Encontro para o Processamento Computacional de Português Escrito e Falado (pp. 61-70).
36. Patrick, D. (1985). A measure of standing of journals in stratified networks. Journal of the American Society for lnformation Science, 8(5-6), 341-363.
37. Peters, H. P. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1994). On determinants of citations scores-A case study in chemical engineering. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27, 292-306.
38. Ratnaparki, A. (1997). A maximum entropy part-of-speech tagger. In Proceedings of the empirical methods in natural language processing conference, University of Pennsylvania.
39. Redner, S. (1998). How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. The European Physical Journal B, 4, 131-134.
40. Shevchuk, R., & Snarskii, A. (2010). Studying the structure of complex networks by the transition to acyclic networks. arXiv: 1010. 1864.
41. Sigman, M., & Cecchi, G. A. (2002). Global organization of the Wordnet lexicon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(3), 7-1742.
42. Tan, P. N., Steinbach, M., & Kumar, V. (2005). Introduction to data mining. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
43. Thomas, J., et al. (2004). Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews: an example from public health. British Medical Journal, 328, 1010-1012.
44. van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). For your citations only?. Scientometrics, 59, 467-472.
45. Velho, L. (1986). The meaning of citation in the context of a scientifically peripheral country. Scientometrics, 9(1-2), 71-89.
46. Vinkler, P. (1987). A quasi-quantitative citation model. Scientometrics, 12, 47-72.
47. Wang, M., Yu, G., & Yu, D. (2009). Effect of the age of papers on the preferential attachment in citation networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 388(19), 4273-4276.
48. White, H. D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 87-108.
49. White, M. D., & Wang, P. L. (1997). A qualitative study of citing behavior: Contributions criteria, and metalevel documentation concerns. Library Quarterly, 67, 122-154.
50. Wright, M., & Armstrong, J. S. (2008). The ombudsman: Verification of citations: Fawlty towers of knowledge? Interfaces, 38, 125-139.