Collaborative behavioral management among parolees: Drug use, crime and re-arrest in the Step'n Out randomized trial

Addiction

Volumn 107, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1099-1108

  Friedmann, Peter D ^a,b,c,d   Green, Traci C ^a,b,c,d   Taxman, Faye S ^g   Harrington, Magdalena ^a,b,c,d   Rhodes, Anne G ^g   Katz, Elizabeth ^e,e,f,f   O'Connell, Daniel ^h   Martin, Steven S ^h   Frisman, Linda K ^i,i   Litt, Mark ^j   Burdon, William ^k,m   Clarke, Jennifer G ^a,b,c,d   Fletcher, Bennett W ^l   Hoskinson, Randall ^a,b,c,d   Richards, Kristina ^a,b,c,d   Prendergast, Michael L ^m   Bartee, Carter ^m  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^d BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e TOWSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Friends Social Research Center   (United States)

^g GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^l NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Community reinforcement approach; Contingency management; Criminal justice; Parole; Probation; Role induction; Substance abuse treatment

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRISONER; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CRIME; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MALE; PRISONERS; RECURRENCE; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84860569666     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03769.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Chandler R. K., Fletcher B. W., Volkow N. D. Treating drug abuse and addiction in the criminal justice system: improving public health and safety. JAMA 2009; 301: 183-90.
2. Hammett T., Roberts C., Kennedy S. Health-related issues in prisoner reentry. Crime Delinq 2001; 47: 390-409.
3. Karberg J. C., James D. J. Substance Dependence, Abuse and Treatment of Jail Inmates 2002. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2005.
4. West H. C., Sabol W., Cooper M. Prisoners in 2008. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2009.
5. Langan N. P., Levin D. J. Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2002.
6. Nurco D. N., Hanlon T. E., Kinlock T. W. Recent research on the relationship between illicit drug use and crime. Behav Sci Law 1991; 9: 221-42.
7. Martin S. S., Butzin C. A., Saum C. A., Inciardi J. A. Three-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved offenders in Delaware: from prison to work release to aftercare. Prison J 1999; 79: 294-320.
8. Sung H., Belenko S., Feng L. Treatment compliance in the trajectory of treatment progress among offenders. J Subst Abuse Treat 2001; 20: 153-62.
9. Aos S., Miller M., Drake E. Evidence-Based Adult Corrections Programs: What Works and What Does Not. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy; 2006. Available at: (accessed 17 November 2011) (Archived by WebCite® at ).
10. Prendergast M. L. Interventions to promote successful re-entry among drug-abusing parolees. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2009; 5: 4-13.
11. Young D. Impacts of perceived legal pressure on retention in drug treatment. Crim Justice Behav 2002; 29: 27-55.
12. Marlowe D. B. Integrating substance abuse treatment and criminal justice supervision. Sci Pract Perspect 2003; 2: 4-14.
13. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Combining Substance Abuse Treatment With Intermediate Sanctions for Adults in the Criminal Justice System. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) no. 12. Vol. DHHS Pub. no. (SMA) 94-3004. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 1994.
14. Taxman F. S. Supervision-exploring the dimensions of effectiveness. Fed Probat 2002; 66: 14-27.
15. Inciardi J. A. The use of parole prediction with institutionalized narcotic addicts. J Res Crime Delinq 1971; 8: 65-73.
16. Seiter R. P. Prisoner reentry and the role of parole officers. Fed Probat 2002; 66: 50-4.
17. Petersilia J. A decade with experimenting with intermediate sanctions: what have we learned? Perspectives 1999; 23: 39-44.
18. Travis J., Solomon A., Waul M. From Prison to Home: The Dimensions and Consequences of Prisoner Reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press; 2001.
19. Friedmann P. D., Katz E. C., Rhodes A. G., Taxman F. S., O'Connell D. J., Frisman L. K. etal. Collaborative behavioral management for drug-involved parolees: rationale and design of the Step'n Out Study. J Offend Rehabil 2008; 47: 290-318.
20. Friedmann P. D., Rhodes A. G., Taxman F. S. for the Step'n Out Research Group of CJ-DATS. Collaborative behavioral management: integration and intensification of parole and outpatient addiction treatment services in the Step'n Out study. J Exp Criminol 2009; 5: 227-43.
21. Walters G. D. The Lifestyle Criminality Screening Form as a predictor of federal parole/probation/supervised release outcomes: a 3-year follow-up. Leg Criminol Psychol 1998; 4: 15-21.
22. Stout R. L., Wirtz P. W., Carbonari J. P., Del Boca F. K. Ensuring balanced distribution of prognostic factors in treatment outcome research. J Stud Alcohol 1994; 12: 70-5.
23. Peters R. H., Greenbaum P. E., Steinberg M. L., Carter C. R., Ortiz M. M., Fry B. C. etal. Effectiveness of screening instruments in detecting substance use disorders among prisoners. J Subst Abuse Treat 2000; 18: 349-58.
24. First M., Spitzer R., Williams J., Gibbons M. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-Patient Version. New York: NY State Psychiatric Institute; 1995.
25. Hall E. A., Zuniga R., Cartier J., Anglin M. D., Danila B., Ryan R. etal. Staying in Touch: A Fieldwork Manual of Tracking Procedures for Locating Substance Abusers in Follow-Up Studies, vol 2. Los Angeles: UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs; 2003.
26. Sobell L. C., Sobell M. B. Timeline followback: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In: Litten R. Z., Allen J., editors. Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychological and Biological Methods. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1992, p. 41-72.
27. Liang K. Y., Zeger S. L. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986; 73: 13-22.
28. Hedeker D., Gibbons R. D., Waternaux C. Sample size estimation for longitudinal designs with attrition: comparing time-related constrasts between two groups. J Educ Behav Stat 1999; 24: 70-93.
29. Petersilia J., Turner S. Comparing intensive and regular supervision for high-risk probationers: early results from an experiment in California. Crime Delinq 1990; 36: 87-111.
30. Taxman F. S. No illusion, offender and organizational change in Maryland's proactive community supervision model. Criminol Pub Policy 2008; 7: 275-302.
31. Taxman F. S., Thanner M., Weisburd D. Risk, Need, and Responsivity (RNR): it all depends. Crime Delinq 2006; 52: 28-51.
32. Taxman F. S., Byrne J. M., Thanner M. H. Evaluating the Implementation and Impact of a Seamless System of Care for Substance Abusing Offenders-the HIDTA Model. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 2003.
33. Wilson D. B., Mitchel O., MacKenzie D. L. Effects of Drug Courts on Criminal Offending and Drug Use. Campbell Collaboration. 2011-11-17. Available at: (accessed 17 November 2011) (Archived by WebCite® at ).
34. Hawken A., Kleiman M. Managing Drug Involved Probationers with Swift and Certain Sanctions: Evaluating Hawaii's HOPE (Washington DC: US Department of Justice: National Institute of Justice, December 2009). 2011-11-17. Available at: (accessed 17 November 2011) (Archived by WebCite® at ).
35. Friedmann P. D., Taxman F. S., Henderson C. E. Evidence-based treatment practices for drug-involved adults in the criminal justice system. J Subst Abuse Treat 2007; 32: 267-77.
36. US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Arrests for Drug Abuse Violations. Crime in the United States, 2010; 2011. Available at: (accessed 17 November 2011).
37. Hubbard R. L., Marsden M. E., Allison M. Reliability and Validity of TOPS Data (RTI/1901/01-15s). Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 1984.