Variation among individuals in cone production in pinus palustris (PINACEAE)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 640-645

  Haymes, Kelly L ^a   Fox, Gordon A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Canopy status; Fire; Heterogeneity; Hurdle model; Longleaf pine; Reproduction; Variation

Indexed keywords

CANOPY ARCHITECTURE; CONIFEROUS TREE; CONSPECIFIC; CORRELATION; HETEROGENEITY; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FLOWER; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PINE; PLANT LEAF; TREE; UNITED STATES;

FLORIDA; GERM CELLS, PLANT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PINUS; PLANT LEAVES; TREES;

CONIFEROPHYTA; PINACEAE; PINUS PALUSTRIS;

EID: 84860552729     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1100339     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. BILA, A. 2000. Fertility variation and its effects on gene diversity in forest tree populations. Ph.D. dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
2. BILIR, N., K.-S. KANG, and D. LINDGREN. 2005. Fertility variation in six populations of Brutian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) over altitudinal ranges. Euphytica 141: 163-168.
3. BILIR, N., K.-S. KANG, and H. OZTURK. 2002. Fertility variation and gene diversity in clonal seed orchards of Pinus brutia, Pinus nigra and Pinus sylvestris in Turkey. Silvae Genetica 51: 112-114.
4. BILIR, N., K.-S. KANG, D. ZANG, and D. LINDGREN. 2004. Fertility variation and status number between a base population and a seed orchard of Pinus brutia. Silvae Genetica 53: 161-164.
5. BOYER, W. D. 1987. Annual and geographic variations in cone production by longleaf pine. In D. R. Phillips (compiler), Proceedings of the fourth biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference in Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 1986, 73-76. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SE-42, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, North Carolina, USA.
6. BOYER, W. D. 1998. Long-term changes in fl owering and cone production by longleaf pine. In T. A. Waldrop [ed.], Proceedings of the ninth biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference in Asheville, North Carolina, USA, 92-98. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SRS-20, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, North Carolina, USA.
7. BROCKWAY, D. G., K. W. OUTCALT, and W. D. BOYER. 2005. Longleaf pine regeneration ecology and methods. In S. Jose, E. J. Jokela, and D. L. Miller [eds.], The longleaf pine ecosystem: Ecology, silviculture, and restoration, 95-133. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
8. BURNHAM, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference. 2nd ed. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
9. CABALLERO, A. 1994. Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity 73: 657-679.
10. CLARK, J. S. 2010. Individuals and the variation needed for high species diversity in forest trees. Science 327: 1129-1132.
11. CLIMENT, J., M. A. PRADA, R. CALAMA, M. R. CHAMBEL, D. S. DE RON, and R. ALÍA. 2008. To grow or to seed: ecotypic variation in reproductive allocation and cone production by young female Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis, Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany, 95: 833-842.
12. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1988. Reproductive success: Studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
13. CROKER, T. C., and W. D. BOYER. 1975. Regenerating longleaf pine naturally. USDA Forest Service Research Paper SO-105, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
14. DUBA, S. E. 1985. Polymorphic isoenzymes from megagametophytes and pollen of longleaf pine: Characterization, inheritance, and use in analyses of genetic variation and genotype verifi cation. In Proceedings of the 25th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference 18, 88-98. Southern Tree Improvement Committee, Long Beach, Mississippi, USA.
15. FANG, W., D. R. TAUB, G. A. F OX, R. M. LANDIS, S. NATALI, and J. GUREVITCH. 2006. Sources of variation in growth, form, and survival in dwarf and normal-stature pitch pines, Pinus rigida (Pinaceae) in long-term transplant experiments. American Journal of Botany 93: 1125-1133.
16. FLOYD, M. E. 1983. Dioecy in five Pinus edulis populations in the Southwestern United States. American Midland Naturalist 110: 405-411.
17. FORD, C. R., E. S. MINOR, and G. A. FOX. 2010. Long-term effects of fire and fire-return interval on population structure and growth of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 40: 1410-1420.
18. FOX, G. A., and B. E. KENDALL. 2002. Demographic stochasticity and the variance reduction effect. Ecology 83: 1928-1934.
19. HAMRICK, J. L., W. J. PLATT, and M. HESSING. 1993. Genetic variation in longleaf pine. In S. M. Hermann [ed.], The longleaf pine ecosystem: Ecology, restoration and management. Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference 18, 193-203. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
20. HERRERA, C. M., P. JORDANO, J. GUITIÁ N, and A. TRAVESET. 1998. Annual variability in seed production by woody plants and the masting concept: Reassessment of principles and relationship to pollination and seed dispersal. American Naturalist 152: 576-594.
21. HERRERA, C. M., and R. JOVANI. 2010. Lognormal distribution of individual lifetime fecundity: Insights from a 23-year study. Ecology 91: 422-430.
22. JACKMAN, S. 2011. pscl: Classes and methods for R developed in the Political Science Computational Laboratory, Stanford University. Department of Political Science, Stanford University. Stanford, California, USA. R package version 1.04.1. URL http://pscl.stanford.edu/
23. KANG, K.-S., A. D. BILA, A. M. HARJU, and D. LINDGREN. 2003. Estimation of fertility variation in forest tree populations. Forestry 76: 329-344.
24. KANG, K.-S., and D. LINDGREN. 1998. Fertility variation and its effect on the relatedness of seeds in Pinus densifl ora, Pinus thunbergii and Pinus koraiensis clonal seed orchards. Silvae Genetica 47: 196-201.
25. KANG, K.-S., and D. LINDGREN. 1999. Fertility variation among clones of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis S. et Z.) and its implications on seed orchard management. Forest Genetics 6: 191-200.
26. KEELEY, J., and P. ZEDLER. (2000). Evolution and life histories of Pinus. In D. M. Richardson [ed.], Ecology and biogeography of Pinus, 219-250. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK.
27. KENDALL, B. E., and G. A. FOX. 2003. Unstructured individual variation and demographic stochasticity. Conservation Biology 17: 1170-1172.
28. KENDALL, B. E., G. A. FOX, M. FUJIWARA, and T. NOGEIRE. 2011. Demographic heterogeneity, cohort selection, and population growth. Ecology 92: 1985-1993.
29. KLINKHAMER, P. G. L., E. MEELIS, T. J. DE JONG, and J. WEINER. 1992. On the analysis of size-dependent reproductive output in plants. Functional Ecology 6: 308-316.
30. LADEAU, S. L., and J. S. C LARK. 2006. Elevated CO2 and tree fecundity: The role of tree size, interannual variability, and population heterogeneity. Global Change Biology 12: 822-833.
31. LANDIS, R. M., and D. R. PEART. 2005. Early performance predicts canopy attainment across life histories in subalpine forest trees. Ecology 86: 63-72.
32. MATZIRIS, D. 1997. Variation in growth, flowering and cone production in a clonal seed orchard of Aleppo pine grown in Greece. Silvae Genetica 46: 224-228.
33. MCDOWELL, S. C. L., N. G. MCDOWELL, J. D. MARSHALL, and K. HULTINE. 2000. Carbon and nitrogen allocation to male and female reproduction in Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca, Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 539-546.
34. NE 'E MAN, G., S. G OUBITZ, M. J. A. WERGER, and A. SHMIDA. 2011. Relationships between tree size, crown shape, gender segregation and sex allocation in Pinus halepensis, a Mediterranean pine tree. Annals of Botany 108: 197-206.
35. NIKLAS, K. J. 1994. Plant allometry: The scaling of form and process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
36. NIKLAS, K. J., and B. J. ENQUIST. 2003. An allometric model for seed plant reproduction. Evolutionary Ecology 5: 79-88.
37. NYLand, R. D. 1998. Selection system in northern hardwoods. Journal of Forestry 96: 18-21.
38. PEDERSON, N., J. S. KUSH, R. S. MELDAHL, and W. D. BOYER. 2000. Longleaf pine cone crops and climate: A possible link. In J. D. Haywood [ed.], Proceedings of the tenth biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, in Shreveport, Louisiana, USA, 1999, 255-258. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SRS-30, Southern Research Station, Asheville, North Carolina, USA.
39. PFISTER, C. A., and S. D. PEACOR. 2003. Variable performance of individuals: The role of population density and endogenously formed landscape heterogeneity. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 725-735.
40. PLATT, W. J., G. W. EVANS, and S. L. RATHBUN. 1988. The population dynamics of a long-lived conifer (Pinus palustris). American Naturalist 131: 491-525.
41. PLATT, W. J., and S. L. RATHBUN. 1993. Dynamics of an old-growth longleaf pine population. In S. M. Hermann [ed.], The longleaf pine ecosystem: Ecology, restoration and management. Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference 18, 275-297. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
42. Santos-Del-Blanco, L., R. ZAS, E. NOTIVOL, M. R. CHAMBEL, J. MAJADA, and J. CLIMENT. 2010. Variation of early reproductive allocation in multi-site genetic trials of maritime pine and Aleppo pine. Forest Systems 19: 381-392.
43. Stover, J., B. E. Kendall, and G. A. Fox. 2011. Demographic heterogeneity impacts density-dependent population dynamics. In press, Theoretical Ecology. doi:10.1007/s12080-011-0129-x
44. WEINER, J., L. G. CAMPBELL, J. PINO, and L. ECHARTE. 2009. The allometry of reproduction within plant populations. Journal of Ecology 97: 1220-1233.
45. ZEILEIS, A., C. KLEIBER, and S. JACKMAN. 2008. Regression models for count data in R. Journal of Statistical Software 27: 1-25. URL http://www.jstatsoft.org/v27/i08/.
46. ZUIDEMA, P. A., R. J. W. BRIENEN, H. J. D URING, and B. GÜNERALP. 2009. Do persistently fast-growing juveniles contribute disproportionately to population growth? A new analysis tool for matrix models and its application to rainforest trees. American Naturalist 174: 709-719.
47. ZUUR, A. F., E. N. IENO, N. J. WALKER, A. A. SAVELIEV, and G. M. SMITH. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in R. Springer, New York, New York, USA.