Transforming public-private networks: An XBRL-based infrastructure for transforming business-to-government information exchange

International Journal of Electronic Government Research

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 35-45

  De Winne, Niels ^a   Janssen, Marijn ^a   Bharosa, Nitesh ^a   Van Wijk, Remco ^a   Hulstijn, Joris ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

E Government; Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL); Information Exchange; Information Intermediaries; Infrastructure; Standard Business Reporting (SBR); Transformation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860551786     PISSN: 15483886     EISSN: 15483894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jegr.2011100103     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alles, M. G., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2008). Putting continuous auditing theory into practice: Lessons from two pilot implementations. Journal of Information Systems, 22(2), 195-214. doi:10.2308/ jis.2008.22.2.195
2. Ciborra, C. U. (2000). A critical review of the literature on the management of corporate information infrastructures . In Ciborra, C. U. (Ed.), From control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructures. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3. Debreceny, R., Felden, C., Ochocki, B., Piechocki, M., & Piechocki, M. (2009). XBRL for interactive data: Engineering the information value chain. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978- 3-642-01437-6
4. Engel, P., Hamsher, W., & Walis, H. vun Kannon, D., & Shuetrim, G. (2003). Extensible business reporting language (XBRL) - Recommendation. Retrieved from http://www.xbrl.org
5. Fountain, J. (2001). Building the virtual state. Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
6. Gil-Garcia, R., Chengalur-Smith, I., & Duchessi, P. (2007). Collaborative e-Government: Impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 121-133. doi:10.1057/palgrave. ejis.3000673
7. Grey, G. L. (2005). XBRL: Potential opportunities and issues for Internal Auditors. Altamone Springs, FL: Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundations (IIARF).
8. Hanseth, O. (2000). The economics of standards . In Ciborra, C. U. (Ed.), From control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructures. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9. Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design theory for adaptive complexity in information infrastructures. Journal of Information Technology, 25(1), 1-19. doi:10.1057/jit.2009.19
10. Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E., & Hatling, M. (1996). Developing information infrastructure: The tension between standardization and flexibility. Science, Technology & Human Values, 21(4), 407-442. doi:10.1177/ 016224399602100402
11. Irani, Z., Elliman, T., & Jackson, P. (2007). Electronic transformation of government in the UK: A research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(4), 327-335. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000698
12. Janssen, M., Chun, S. A., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2009). Building the next generation of digital government infrastructures . Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 233-237. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.006
13. Kim, H., Pan, G., & Pan, S. (2007). Managing IT-enabled transformation in the public sector: A case study on e-government in South Korea. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 338-352. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2006.09.007
14. Murphy, J. (2005). Beyond e-government the world's most successful technology-enabled transformations, executive summary. New York, NY: INSEAD.
15. Orlikowski, W., & Lacono, S. (2001). Desperately seeking the "IT" in IT research-A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121-134. doi:10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700
16. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
17. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., & Avery, C. (1995). Roles for electronic broker. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Sarbanes-Oxley. (2002). Act of 2002. Retrieved. http://www.soxlaw.com/ index.htm
19. Sarkar, M. B., Butler, B., & Steinfield, C. (1995). Intermediaries and cybermediaries: A continuing role for mediating players in the electronic marketplace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(3).
20. Spies, M. (2010). An ontology modelling perspective on business reporting. Information Systems, 35, 404-416. doi:10.1016/j.is.2008.12.003
21. Weerakkody, V., & Dhillon, G. (2008). Moving from e-government to t-government: A study of process re-engineering challenges in a UK local authority perspective. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4(4), 1-16. doi:10.4018/ jegr.2008100101
22. Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011). Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): Lessons from the British and Dutch public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 320-328. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2010.07.010
23. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.