Learners favour high resolution oesophageal manometry with better diagnostic accuracy over conventional line tracings

Gut

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 798-803

  Soudagar, A Samad ^a   Sayuk, Gregory S ^a   Gyawali, C Prakash ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APERISTALSIS; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ESOPHAGUS EXAMINATION; ESOPHAGUS MANOMETRY; ESOPHAGUS MOTILITY; HIGH RESOLUTION OESOPHAGUS MANOMETRY; HUMAN; LOWER ESOPHAGUS SPHINCTER; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; MEDICAL STUDENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERISTALSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL; ESOPHAGEAL ACHALASIA; ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY DISORDERS; ESOPHAGUS; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MANOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 84860548176     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: 14683288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301145     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Murray JA, Clouse RE, Conklin JL. Components of the standard oesophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2003;15:591-606. (Pubitemid 38030637)
2. Clouse RE, Prakash C. Topographic esophageal manometry: an emerging clinical and investigative approach. Dig Dis 2000;18:64-74.
3. Salvador R, Dubecz A, Polomsky M, et al. A new era in esophageal diagnostics: the image-based paradigm of high-resolution manometry. J Am Coll Surg 2009;208:1035-44.
4. Grubel C, Hiscock R, Hebbard G. Value of spatiotemporal representation of manometric data. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:525-30.
5. Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Rice J, et al. Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007;293:G878-85. (Pubitemid 47605932)
6. Staiano A, Clouse RE. Detection of incomplete lower esophageal sphincter relaxation with conventional point-pressure sensors. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:3258-67. (Pubitemid 34016646)
7. Fox M, Hebbard G, Janiak P, et al. High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identified clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004;16:533-42. (Pubitemid 39472186)
8. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Lodhia N, et al. Utilizing intraluminal pressure gradients to predict esophageal clearance: a validation study. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:1898-905.
9. Kim HC, Pandolfino JE, Komanduri S, et al. Use of a continuing medical education course to improve fellows' knowledge and skills in esophageal disorders. Dis Esophagus 2011;24:388-94.
10. Miller MD, Ferris DG. Measurement of subjective phenomena in primary care research: the Visual Analogue Scale. Fam Pract Res J 1993;13:15-24.
11. Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, et al. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1526-33.
12. Clouse RE, Parks TR, Staiano A, et al. Creation of an electronic sleeve emulation (eSleeve) for use with solid-state high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 2004;126:A111.
13. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Zhang Q, et al. Quantifying EGJ relaxation with high resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006;290:G1033-40.
14. Roman S, Lin Z, Kwiatek MA, et al. Weak peristalsis in esophageal pressure topography: classification and association with dysphagia. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:349-56.
15. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J, et al. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:27-37.
16. Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ. Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice. Gut 2008;57:405-23. (Pubitemid 351288108)