A New Era in Esophageal Diagnostics: The Image-Based Paradigm of High-Resolution Manometry

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 208, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1035-1044

  Salvador, Renato ^a   Dubecz, Attila ^a   Polomsky, Marek ^a   Gellerson, Oliver ^a   Jones, Carolyn E ^a   Raymond, Daniel P ^a   Watson, Thomas J ^a   Peters, Jeffrey H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ESOPHAGOSCOPY; ESOPHAGUS DISEASE; ESOPHAGUS MANOMETRY; ESOPHAGUS MOTILITY; ESOPHAGUS OBSTRUCTION; ESOPHAGUS PH; FEMALE; HIATUS HERNIA; HUMAN; LOWER ESOPHAGUS SPHINCTER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ESOPHAGEAL DISEASES; ESOPHAGUS; FEMALE; HERNIA, HIATAL; HUMANS; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67349251886     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.02.049     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Nguyen H.N., Domingues G.R.S., and Lammert F. Technological insights: combined impedence manometry for esophageal motility testing; current results and further implications. World J Gastroenterol 12 (2006) 6266-6273
2. Bhatia S.J. Oesophageal manometry: an overview. J Postgrad Med 39 (1993) 33-35
3. Nguyen H.N., Silney J., and Matern S. Multiple intraluminal electrical impedancometry for recording of upper gastrointestinal motility; current results and further implications. AM J Gastroenterol 94 (1999) 306-317
4. Clouse H.N., Staiano J., Alrakawi S., and Haroian S. Application of topographic methods to clinical esophageal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 95 (2000) 2720-2730
5. Pandolfino J.E., Kim H., Ghosh S.K., et al. High-resolution manometry of the EGJ: an analysis of crural diaphragm function in GERD. Am J Gastroenterol 102 (2007) 1056-1063
6. Fox M., Hebbard G., Janiak P., et al. High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 16 (2004) 533-542
7. Clouse R.E., Staiano A., Alrakawi A., and Haroian L. Application of topographical methods to clinical esophageal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 95 (2000) 2720-2730
8. Pandolfino J.E., Ghosh S.K., Zhang Q., et al. Quantifying EGJ morphology and relaxation with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 290 (2006) G1033-G1040
9. Pandolfino J.E., Zhang Q.G., Ghosh S.K., et al. Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and reflux: mechanistic analysis using concurrent fluoroscopy and high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 131 (2006) 1725-1733
10. Jones M.P., Post J., and Crowell M.D. High-resolution manometry in the evaluation of anorectal disorders: a simultaneous comparison with water-perfused manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 102 (2007) 850-855
11. Bremner C.G., DeMeester T.R., Huprich J.E., and Bremer R.M. Esophageal disease and testing (2005), Taylor & Francis, New York
12. Kahrilas P.J., and Ghosh S.K. Pandolfino JE. Challenging the limits of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 134 (2008) 16-18
13. Pandolfino J.E., Ghosh S.K., Rice J., et al. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol 103 (2008) 27-37