Assessment of MRI issues at 3-Tesla for metallic surgical implants: Findings applied to 61 additional skin closure staples and vessel ligation clips

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Gill, Amreeta ^a   Shellock, Frank G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Artifacts; Implants; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; MRI; Safety; Specific Absorption Rate

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CLIP; HEATING; MAGNETIC FIELD; METAL IMPLANTATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STAPLER; TEMPERATURE; WOUND CLOSURE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; LIGATION; MATERIALS TESTING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURE; VASCULAR SURGERY;

METAL;

ARTIFACTS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; LIGATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MATERIALS TESTING; METALS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURES; TEMPERATURE; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84860544504     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-3     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Scientific basis for the selection of surgical staples and tissue adhesives for closure of skin wounds. Edlich RF, Gubler K, Stevens HS, Wallis AG, Clark JJ, Dahlstrom JJ, Rhoads SK, Long WB, J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 2010 29 327 37 21284596
2. An overview of vascular closure devices: what every radiologist should know. Hon L-Q, Ganeshan A, Thomas SM, Warakaulle D, Jagdish J, Uberoi R, Eur J Radiol 2010 73 181 190 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.023 19041208
3. Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and non-ferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and aneurysm clips in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. New PFJ, Rosen BR, Brady TJ, Buonanno FS, Kistler JP, Burt CT, Hinshaw WS, Newhouse JH, Pohost GM, Taveras JM, Radiology 1983 147 139 148 6828719 (Pubitemid 13112333)
4. Magnetic field effects on surgical ligation clips. Brown MA, Carden JA, Coleman RE, McKinney R Jr, Spicer LD, Magn Reson Imaging 1987 5 443 453 10.1016/0730-725X(87)90378-X 3431354
5. Magnetic resonance imaging and surgical clips. Barrafato D, Henkelman RM, Can J Surg 1984 27 509 512 6478330 (Pubitemid 14015095)
6. Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system. Shellock FG, J Magn Reson Imaging 2002 16 721 732 10.1002/jmri.10207 12451586 (Pubitemid 35375571)
7. In vitro evaluation of MR imaging issues at 3-T for aneurysm clips made from MP35N: Findings and information applied to 155 additional aneurysm clips. Shellock FG, Valencerina S, American Journal of Neuroradiology 2010 31 615 619 10.3174/ajnr.A1918 20037131
8. Reference Manual for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Implants and Devices: 2012 Edition. Shellock FG, Biomedical Research Publishing Group, Los Angeles, CA 2012
9. MRI Safety Update 2008: Part 2, Screening Patients for MRI. Shellock FG, Spinazzi A, AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008 191 12 21
10. Ligating clips for three-dimensional MR angiography at 1.5-T: in vitro evaluation. Weishaupt D, Quick HH, Nanz D, Schmidt M, Cassina PC, Debatin JF, Radiology 2000 214 902 907 10715066 (Pubitemid 30115400)
11. MR liver imaging and cholangiography in the presence of metallic surgical clips at 1.5 and 3 Tesla. Merkle EM, Dale BM, Thomas J, Paulson EK, Eur Radiol 2006 16 2309 2316 10.1007/s00330-006-0234-1 16703314 (Pubitemid 44349879)
12. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Schenck JF, Med Phys 1996 23 815 843 10.1118/1.597854 8798169 (Pubitemid 26192503)
13. Standard practice for marking medical devices and other items for safety in the magnetic resonance environment. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, Designation F2503-08, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA 2008
14. MRI labeling information for implants and devices: Explanation of terminology. Shellock FG, Woods TO, Crues JV, Radiology 2009 253 26 30 10.1148/radiol.2531091030 19789253
15. Standard test method for measurement of magnetically induced displacement force on passive implants in the magnetic resonance environment. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, Designation F2052-06, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA 2006
16. Confusion regarding the value reported for the term "spatial gradient magnetic field" and how this information is applied to labeling of medical implants and devices. Shellock FG, Kanal E, Gilk T, AJR Amer J Roentgen 2011 196 142 145 10.2214/AJR.10.5004
17. Standard test method for measurement of radio frequency induced heating near passive implants during magnetic resonance imaging. American Society for Testing and Materials International, Designation F2182-011, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA 2011