How can economic interests influence support for free trade?

International Organization

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 311-328

  Fordham, Benjamin O ^a   Kleinberg, Katja B ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860540025     PISSN: 00208183     EISSN: 15315088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0020818312000057     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baker, Andy. 2003. Why Is Trade Reform So Popular in Latin America? A Consumption-Based Theory of Trade Policy Preferences. World Politics 55 (3):423-55.
2. -. 2005. Who Wants to Globalize? Consumer Tastes and Labor Markets in a Theory of Trade Policy Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 49 (4):924-38.
3. Balistreri, Edward J. 1997. The Performance of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Model in Predicting Endogenous Policy Forces at the Individual Level. Canadian Journal of Economics 30 (1):1-17.
4. Beaulieu, Eugene, Ravindra A. Yatawara, and Wei Guo Wang. 2005. Who Supports Free Trade in Latin America? World Economy 28 (7):941-58.
5. Conover, Pamela Johnston, Stanley Feldman, and Kathleen Knight. 1986. Judging Inflation and Unemployment: The Origins of Retrospective Evaluations. Journal of Politics 48 (3):565-88.
6. -. 1987. The Personal and Political Underpinnings of Economic Forecasts. American Journal of Political Science 31 (3):559-83.
7. Edwards, Martin S. 2006. Public Opinion Regarding Economic and Cultural Globalization: Evidence from a Cross-National Survey. Review of International Political Economy 13 (4):587-608.
8. Guisinger, Alexandra. 2009. Determining Trade Policy: Do Voters Hold Politicians Accountable? International Organization 63 (3):533-57.
9. Hainmueller, Jens, and Michael J. Hiscox. 2006. Learning to Love Globalization: Education and Individual Attitudes Toward International Trade. International Organization 60 (2):469-98.
10. Kleinberg, Katja B., and Benjamin O. Fordham. 2010. Trade and Foreign Policy Attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 54 (5):687-714.
11. Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Mary Stegmaier. 2000. Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1):183-219.
12. Lupia, Arthur. 1994. Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections. American Political Science Review 88 (1):63-76.
13. Lupia, Arthur, and Matthew D. McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Mansfield, Edward D., and Diana C. Mutz. 2009. Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety. International Organization 63 (3):425-57.
15. Mayda, Anna Maria, and Dani Rodrik. 2005. Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist Than Others? European Economic Review 49 (6):1393-430.
16. O'Rourke, Kevin H. 2003. Heckscher-Ohlin Theory and Individual Attitudes Towards Globalization. Working Paper 9872. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
17. O'Rourke, Kevin H., and Richard Sinnott. 2001. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence. In Brookings Trade Forum, 2001, edited by Susan M. Collins and Dani Rodrik, 157-206. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
18. Popkin, Samuel L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Rankin, David M. 2001. Identities, Interests, and Imports. Political Behavior 23 (4):351-76.
20. Scheve, Kenneth F., and Matthew J. Slaughter. 2001a. What Determines Individual Trade-Policy Preferences? Journal of International Economics 54 (2):267-92.
21. -. 2001b. Globalization and the Perceptions of American Workers. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
22. Sears, David O., and Carolyn L. Funk. 1990. Self-Interest in Americans' Political Opinions. In Beyond Self-Interest, edited by Jane J. Mansbridge, 147-70. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. -. 1991. The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24:1-91.