Morphology-syntax interface for Turkish LFG

COLING/ACL 2006 - 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 153-160

  Çetinoǧlu, Özlem ^a   Oflazer, Kemal ^a  

^a SABANCI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

COMPLEX MORPHOLOGY; GRAMMAR RULES; INTERNAL STRUCTURE; LEXICAL-FUNCTIONAL GRAMMAR; LINGUISTIC PHENOMENA; ON THE FLIES; TURKISHS; VALENCIES;

MORPHOLOGY;

EID: 84860539996     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1220175.1220195     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Chris Barker, Jorge Hankamer, and John Moore, 1990. Grammatical Relations, chapterWa and Ga in Turkish. CSLI.
2. Cem Bozşahin. 2002. The combinatory morphemic lexicon. Computational Linguistics, 28(2):145-186.
3. Miriam Butt and Tracey Holloway King. 2005. Restriction for morphological valency alternations: The Urdu causative. In Proceedings of The 10th International LFG Conference, Bergen, Norway. CSLI Publications.
4. Ruken Çakici. 2005. Automatic induction of a CCG grammar for Turkish. In Proceedings of the ACL Student Research Workshop, pages 73-78, Ann Arbor, Michigan, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Mary Dalrymple. 2001. Lexical Functional Grammar, volume 34 of Syntax and Semantics. Academic Press, New York.
6. Gülşen Eryiǧit and Kemal Oflazer. 2006. Statistical dependency parsing for turkish. In Proceedings of EACL 2006 - The 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Trento, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Anette Frank, Louisa Sadler, Josef van Genabith, and Andy Way. 2003. From treebank resources to LFG f-structures:automatic f-structure annotation of treebank trees and CFGs extracted from treebanks. In Anne Abeille, editor, Treebanks. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
8. Zelal Güngördü and Elisabeth Engdahl. 1998. A relational approach to relativization in Turkish. In Joint Conference on Formal Grammar, HPSG and Categorial Grammar, Saarbrücken, Germany, August.
9. Zelal Güngördü and Kemal Oflazer. 1995. Parsing Turkish using the Lexical Functional Grammar formalism. Machine Translation, 10(4):515-544.
10. Bariş Kabak. 2007. Turkish suspended affixation. Linguistics, 45. (to appear).
11. Ronald M. Kaplan and Joan Bresnan. 1982. Lexicalfunctional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In Joan Bresnan, editor, The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pages 173-281. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Ronald M. Kaplan and Annie Zaenen. 1988. Longdistance dependencies, constituent structure, and functional uncertainty. In M. Baitin and A. Kroch, editors, Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
13. John T. Maxwell III and Ronald M. Kaplan. 1996. An efficient parser for LFG. In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, editors, The Proceedings of the LFG '96 Conference, Rank Xerox, Grenoble.
14. Ruth O'Donovan, Michael Burke, Aoife Cahill, Josef van Genabith, and Andy Way. 2005. Large-scale induction and evaluation of lexical resources from the Penn-II and Penn-III Treebanks. Computational Linguistics, 31(3):329-365.
15. Kemal Oflazer, Bilge Say, Dilek Zeynep Hakkani-Tür, and Gökhan Tür. 2003. Building a Turkish treebank. In Anne Abeille, editor, Building and Exploiting Syntactically-annotated Corpora. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. Kemal Oflazer. 1994. Two-level description of Turkish morphology. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 9(2):137-148.
17. Kemal Oflazer. 2003. Dependency parsing with an extended finite-state approach. Computational Linguistics, 29(4):515-544.