Technology shops: Efficient pricing in business-university collaborations

Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 17-30

  Cameron, Gavin ^a   Wallace, Christopher ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Business university collaboration; Screening; Technology shops

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860528916     PISSN: 10438599     EISSN: 14768364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10438590600661632     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Beath, J., Owen, R. F., Poyago-Theotoky, J., and Ulph, D., 2003. Optimal Incentives for Income-Generation in Universities: the Rule of Thumb for the Compton Tax. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21: 1301–1322.
2. Bozeman, B., 2000. Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory. Research Policy, 29: 627–655.
3. DTI. 2005. “ Letter from Lord Sainsbury of Turville on Higher Education Research ”. Available online at: http://www.ost.gov.uk/research/dualsupport.htm
4. Feller, I., 1990. Universities as Engines of R&D Based Economic Growth: They Think They Can. Research Policy, 19: 335–348.
5. Goldfard, B., and Henrekson, M., 2003. Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down Policies Towards the Commercialization of University Intellectual Property. Research Policy, 32: 639–658.
6. Guellec, D., and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., 2001. R&D and Productivity Growth: Panel Data Analysis of 16 OECD Countries. OECD Economic Studies, 33: 103–126.
7. Hall, B., 2001. “ University–Industry Research Partnerships and Intellectual Property. presentation, NSF-CISTP Workshop ”. Washington, DC
8. Hall, B., Link, A., and Scott, J., 2003. Universities as Research Partners. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85: 485–491.
9. HM, Treasury. 2000. Cross-Cutting Review of the Knowledge Economy: Review of Government Information, London: HMSO.
10. **t We Get to Work with. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21: 1271–1300.
11. Jensen, R. A., and Thursby, M. C., 2001. Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: the Licensing of University Inventions. American Economic Review, 91: 240–259.
12. Mansfield, E., and Lee, J.-Y., 1996. The Modern University: Contributor to Industrial Innovation and Recipient of Industrial R&D Support. Research Policy, 25: 1047–1058.
13. Maskin, E., and Riley, J., 1984. Monopoly with Incomplete Information. Rand Journal of Economics, 15: 171–196.
14. Mussa, M., and Rosen, S., 1978. Monopoly and Product Quality. Journal of Economic Theory, 18: 301–317.
15. Office, of Science, and Technology. 2000. SET Statistics, London: HMSO.
16. Poyago-Theotoky, J., Beath, J., and Siegel, D. S., 2002. Universities and Fundamental Research: Reflections on the Growth of University–Industry Partnerships. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18: 10–21.
17. Salanié, B., 1997. The Economics of Contracts: a Primer, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Salter, A., and Martin, B., 2001. The Economic Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research: a Critical Review. Research Policy, 30: 509–532.
19. Siegel, D., Waldman, D., and Link, A., 2003. Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Relative Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: an Exploratory Study. Research Policy, 32: 27–48.