The meaning of standardized language nanda-nic-noc intensive care nurses in madrid: A phenomenological approach;El significado del lenguaje estandarizado NANDA-NIC-NOC en las enfermeras de cuidados intensivos madrileñas: Abordaje fenomenológico

Enfermeria Intensiva

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 68-76

  Cachon Perez J M ^a   Alvarez Lopez C ^a   Palacios Cena D ^b  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE FUENLABRADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Intensive care unit; Nursing; Nursing diagnosis; Nursing education; Standardized nursing language

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; LINGUISTICS; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING DIAGNOSIS; SPAIN;

ADULT; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING DIAGNOSIS; SPAIN; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84860505520     PISSN: 11302399     EISSN: 15781291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enfi.2011.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. NANDA Internacional. Diagnósticos enfermeros: definiciones y clasificación (2009-2010) 2010, Elsevier, Barcelona. T.H. Herdman (Ed.).
2. Diagnósticos Enfermeros, Resultados e Intervenciones: Interrelaciones NANDA, NOC, NIC 2004, Elsevier, Madrid. M. Johnson, G. Bulechek, J.M. Dochterman, M. Maas, S. Moorhead (Eds.).
3. Los diagnósticos enfermeros: Revisión critica y guía practica 2008, Elsevier-Masson, Barcelona. 8.a ed. M.T. Luis Rodrigo (Ed.).
4. Gudmundsdottir E., Delaney C., Thoroddsen A., Karlsson T. Translation and validation of the Nursing Outcomes Classification labels and definitions for acute care nursing in Iceland. J Adv Nurs 2004, 46:292-302.
5. Kautz D.D., Van Horn E.R. An Ejemplar of the Use of NNN Language in Developing Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2008, 19:14-19.
6. Stone P.W., Lee N.J., Giannini M., Bakken S. Econocmic Evaluation and Usefulness of Standardized Nursing Terminologies. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2004, 15:101-113.
7. De Cordova P.B., Lucero R.J., Jun S. Using the Nursing Interventions Classification as a Potential Measure of Nurse Workload. J Nurs Care Qual 2010, 25:39-45.
8. De Fátima Lucena A., Bottura Leite de Barros A.L. Nursing Diagnosis in a Brazilian Intensive Care Unit. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2006, 17:139-146.
9. Muller-Staub M., Lavin M.A., Needham I., Van Achterberg T. Nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes - application and impact on nursing practice: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2006, 56:514-531.
10. Robbins B.T. Application of Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) in a cardiovascular critical care unit. J Contin Educ Nurs 1997, 28:78-82.
11. Giménez A.M., Serrano P., Marín B. Clinical validation of dysfunctional ventilatory weaning response: The Spanish experience. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2003, 14:53-64.
12. Do Vale I.N., De Souza S.R., Carmona E.V. Nursing diagnoses identified during parent group meetings in a neonatal intensive care unit. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2005, 16:65-73.
13. Pyykkö A.K., Laurila J., Ala-Kokko T.I., Hentinen M., Janhonen S.A. Intensive care nursing scoring system. Part 1: Classification of nursing diagnoses. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2000, 16:345-356.
14. Pyykkö A.K., Laurila J., Ala-Kokko T.I., Hentinen M. Intensive Care Nursing Scoring System. Part 2: Nursing interventions and nursing outcomes. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2001, 17:16-28.
15. Gutierrez Alejandro A., Calvo Buey J.A., Marcos Camina R.M. Study for the decrease of errors in the records of hydric balances of critical patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Enferm Intensiva 2005, 16:100-109.
16. Kuper A., Reeves S., Levinson W. An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008, 337:404-409.
17. Dew K. A health researcher's guide to qualitative methodologies. Aust N Z J Public Health 2007, 31:433-437.
18. Giorgi A. Phenomenology and the Foundation of Psychology. Nebr Symp Motiv 1975, 23:281-348.
19. Giorgi A. Concerning the application of phenomenology to caring research. Scand J Caring Sci 2000, 14:11-15.
20. Starks H., Trinidad S.B. Choose your method: A comparison of Phenomenology. Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory. Qual Health Res 2007, 17:1372-1380.
21. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research 2005, Sage publications, Thousand Oaks. 3 ed. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.).
22. Mayan, MJ. Una introducción a los métodos cualitativos: Módulo de entrenamiento para estudiantes y profesionales. Qual Institute Press [libro en Internet]. 2001 [consultado 15 Abr 2011]. Disponible en: . http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm//pdfs/introduccion.pdf.
23. Readme first for a user's Guide to Qualitative Methods 2002, Sage Publications, California. J.M. Morse, Richards L (Eds.).
24. Gearing R.E. Bracketing in research: A typology. Qual Health Res 2004, 14:1429-1452.
25. Palacios-Ceña D., Corral Liria I. The basics and development of a phenomenological research protocol in nursing. Enferm Intensiva 2010, 21:68-73.
26. Dowling M. From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches. Int J Nurs Stud 2007, 44:131-142.
27. Tong A., Sainsbury P., Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007, 19:349-357.
28. Cohen D.J., Crabtree B.F. Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations. Ann Fam Med 2008, 6:331-339.
29. Qualitative Methods for Health Research 2009, Sage Publications, London. 2 ed. J. Green, N. Thorogood (Eds.).
30. Giorgi A. The theory, practice and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. J Phenomenol Psicol 1997, 28:235-260.
31. Qualitative Research in Health Care 2006, BMJ books, London. 3ed. C. Pope, N. Mays (Eds.).
32. Clark J.P. How to peer review a qualitative manuscript. Peer Review in Health Sciences 2003, 219-235. BMJ Books, London. 2 ed. F. Godlee, T. Jefferson (Eds.).
33. Ley Orgánica 15/1999, de 13 de diciembre, de Protección de Datos de Carácter Personal. BOE [versión en Internet]. 1999 [citado 15 Abr 2011]; 298: [aprox 13 p.]. Disponible en: . http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/1999/12/14/pdfs/A43088-43099.pdf.
34. Hewitt J. Ethical components of researcher researched relationships in qualitative interviewing. Qual Health Res 2007, 17:1149-1159.
35. González Sánchez J.A., Corujo Fernández B., Colino Lamparero M.J., López Ortega S., Molina de Arévalo M.V., Rosado Muñoz N., et al. Plan de cuidados frente a protocolo asistencial. Análisis comparativo en pacientes sometidos a cateterismo cardíaco. Enferm Intensiva 2006, 17:104-114.
36. Wong E. Novel Nursing Terminologies for the Rapad Response System. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2009, 20:53-63.
37. De Lima Lopes J., Bottura Leite de Barros A.L., Marlene Michel J.L. A Pilot Study to Validate the Priority Nursing Interventions Classification Interventions and Nursing Outcomes Classification Outcomes for the Nursing Diagnosis " Excess Fluid Volume" in Cardiac Patients. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2009, 20:76-88.
38. Müller-Staub M. Evaluation of the Implementation of Nursing Diagnoses. Interventions, and Outcomes. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2009, 20:9-15.
39. Von Krogh G., Dale C., Naden D. A Framework for Integrating NANDA NIC, and NOC Terminology in Electronic Patient Records. J Nurs Scholarsh 2005, 37:275-281.
40. Klehr J., Hafner J., Spelz L.M., Steen S., Weaver K. Implementation of standardized nomenclature in the electronic medical record. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2009, 20:169-180.
41. Farren A. An Educational Strategy for teaching Standardized Nursing Languages. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2010, 21:3-13.
42. Doucette E., Brandys D., Canapi B.K., Davis A., DiNardo J., Imamedjian I. The intensive care unit an untapped learning resource: A student perspective. Dynamics 2011, 22:19-23.
43. Müller-Staub M., Needham I., Odenbreit M., Lavin M.A., Van Achterberg T. Improved Quality of Nursing Documentation: Results of a Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes Implementation Study. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2007, 18:5-17.
44. Urquhart C, Currell R, Grant MJ, Hardiker NR. Nursing record systems: effect on nursing practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Reviews [Internet]. 2003 [citado 15 Abr 2011]; [aprox 1p.]. Disponible en: . http://www2.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab002099.html.
45. Wikström A.C. Technology- an actor in the ICU: a study in workplace research tradition. J Clin Nurs 2004, 13:555-561.
46. Barnard A. Nursing and the primacy of technological progress. Int J Nurs Stud 1999, 36:435-442.
47. Palacios-Ceña D. Management of technology and its influence on nursing care. Enferm Clin 2007, 17:146-151.
48. Barnard A., Sandelowski M. Technology and humane nursing care: (ir)reconcilable or invented difference?. J Adv Nurs 2001, 34:367-375.
49. Palacios Ceña D. La construcción moderna de la enfermería. Cultura De Los Cuidados 2007, 22:26-32.
50. Wilkin K. A critical analysis of the philosophy, knowledge and theory underpinning mouth care practice for the intensive care unit patient. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2002, 18:181-188.
51. Haghenbeck K. Critical Care Nurses experiences when Technology Malfunctions. J N Y State Nurses Assoc 2005, 36:13-19.
52. Palacios Ceña D. Modernidad, positivismo y tecnología: Influencia en la enfermería y en pacientes que necesitan equipamiento tecnológico. Index Enfermería 2008, 17:188-192.