Weakly supervised learning methods for improving the quality of gene name normalization data

ACL-ISMB 2005 - Linking Biological Literature, Ontologies and Databases: Mining Biological Semantics, Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-8

  Wellner, Ben ^a,b  

^a MITRE CORPORATION   (United States)

^b BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

BIOMEDICAL TEXT MININGS; BUILD SYSTEMS; HIGH QUALITY; NORMALISATION; ONTOLOGY'S; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY TRAINING; SUPERVISED LEARNING METHODS; TRAINING DATA; WEAKLY SUPERVISED LEARNING;

SUPERVISED LEARNING;

EID: 84860504121     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Crim, J., R. McDonald, and F. Pereira. Automatically Annotating Documents with Normalized Gene Lists. in EMBO Workshop - A critical assessment of text mining methods in molecular biology. 2004. Granada, Spain.
2. Blum, A. and T. Mitchell. Combining Labeled and Unlabeled Data with Co-training. 1998. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Learning Theory: Morgan Kaufmann.
3. Banko, M. and E. Brill. Scaling to very very large corpora for natural language disambiguation. in ACL/EACL. 2001.
4. Ng, V. and C. Cardie. Weakly Supervised Natural Language Learning Without Redundant Views. in Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT/NAACL). 2003.
5. Hirschman, L., et al., Overview of BioCreAtIvE task 1B: Normalized Gene Lists. BioMed Central BioInformatics, 2005(Special Issue on BioCreAtIvE).
6. Craven, M. and J. Kumlien, Constructing Biological Knowledge Bases by Extracting Information from Text Sources. 1999: p. 77-86.
7. Morgan, A., et al., Gene Name Extraction Using FlyBase Resources. ACL Workshop on Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine, 2003.
8. Morgan, A.A., et al., Gene name identification and normalization using a model organism database. J Biomed Inform, 2004. 37(6): p. 396-410.
9. Nigam, K. and R. Ghani. Analyzing the effectiveness and applicability of co-training. in Information and Knowledge Management. 2000.
10. Kim, J.-D., et al., GENIA Corpus - a semantically annotated corpus for bio-text mining. Bioinformatics, 2003. 19((Supppl 1)): p. 180-182.
11. Lafferty, J., A. McCallum, and F. Pereira. Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data. in 18th International Conf. on Machine Learning. 2001. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
12. McDonald, R. and F. Pereira. Identifying Gene and Protein Mentions in Text Using Conditional Random Fields. in A critical assessment of text mining methods in molecular biology, BioCreative 2004. 2004. Grenada, Spain.
13. Cohen, I. and M. Goldszmidt. Properties and Benefits of Calibrated Classifiers. in EMCL/PKDD. 2004. Pisa, Italy.
14. Culotta, A. and A. McCallum. Confidence Estimation for Information Extraction. in Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT-NAACL). 2004. Boston, MA.