How to make the unpopular popular? Policy characteristics, social norms and the acceptability of environmental policies

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 19-20, Issue , 2012, Pages 100-107

  de Groot, Judith I M ^a   Schuitema, Geertje ^b  

^a BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Acceptability; Behavioural target; Policy characteristics; Pull measures; Push measures; Social norms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONCEPT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOW COST BEHAVIOR; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC RELATIONS; PULL MEASURE; PUSH MEASURE; SOCIAL ATTITUDE; SUPPORT GROUP; TARGETED HIGH COST BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84860503134     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ajzen I. Attitudes, Personality, and Behaviour 1988, Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
2. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour 1980, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3. Bamberg S., Rölle D. Determinants of people's acceptability of pricing measures: replication and extension of a causal model. Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies 2003, 235-248. Elsevier Science, Oxford. J. Schade, B. Schlag (Eds.).
4. Bamberg S., Schmidt S. Incentives, morality or habit? Predicting students' car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz and Triandis. Environment and Behavior 2003, 35:264-285.
5. Banister D. The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy 2008, 15:73-80.
6. Biel A., Thøgersen J. Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: a review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology 2007, 28:93-112.
7. BBC, 2009. Drivers 'Don't Trust' Road Taxes. Available from: (assessed 21.10.2010). http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8165606.stm.
8. Christoph I.B., Bruhn M., Roosen J. Knowledge, attitudes towards and acceptability of genetic modification in Germany. Appetite 2008, 51:58-68.
9. Cialdini R.B., Kallgren C.A., Reno R.R. A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1991, 24:201-234.
10. Cialdini R.B. Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2003, 12:105-109.
11. Cialdini R., Demaine L., Sagarin B., Barrett D., Rhoads K., Winter P. Managing norms for persuasive impact. Social Influence 2006, 1:3-15.
12. Dawes R.M. Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology 1980, 31:169-193.
13. De Groot J.I.M., Steg L. Quality of life and sustainable transportation: an explorative study in five countries. Journal of Transport Geography 2006, 14:463-470.
14. De Groot J.I.M., Steg L. Morality and prosocial behavior: the role of awareness, responsibility and norms in the norm activation model. Journal of Social Psychology 2009, 149:425-449.
15. De Groot J.I.M., Steg L. Morality and nuclear energy: perceptions of risks and benefits, personal norms and willingness to take action related to nuclear energy. Risk Analysis 2010, 30:1363-1373.
16. Diekmann A., Preisendörfer P. The behavioural effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situation. Rationality and Society 2003, 15:441-472.
17. Dorset County Council, 2010. Dorset Data Book 2010. Data and Statistics for the County of Dorset. Available from: (assessed 29.06.2011). http://www.dorsetforyou.com/media.jsp%3Fmediaid=154835%26filetype=pdf.
18. Eriksson L., Garvill J., Nordlund A.M. Acceptability of travel demand management measures: the importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2006, 26:15-26.
19. Eriksson L., Garvill J., Nordlund A.M. Acceptability of single and combined transport policy measures: the importance of environmental and policy specific beliefs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2008, 42:1117-1128.
20. Gärling T., Loukopoulos P. Effectiveness, public acceptance, and political feasibility of coercive measures for reducing car traffic. Threats to the Quality of Urban Life from Car Traffic: Problems, Causes, and Solutions 2007, 313-324. Elsevier, Amsterdam. T. Gärling, L. Steg (Eds.).
21. Gärling T., Schuitema G. Travel demand management targeting reduced private car use: effectiveness, public acceptability and political feasibility. Journal of Social Issues 2007, 63:139-153.
22. Guagnano G.A., Stern P.C., Dietz T. Influences on attitude-behavior relationships. A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior 1995, 27:699-718.
23. Jaensirisak S., Wardman M., May A.D. Explaining variations in public acceptability of road pricing schemes. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2005, 39:127-153.
24. Jakobsson C., Fujii S., Gärling T. Determinants of private car users' acceptance of road pricing. Transport Policy 2000, 7:153-158.
25. Joireman J.A., Lasane T.P., Bennett J., Richards D., Solaimani S. Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology 2001, 40:133-155.
26. Loukopoulos P., Jakobsson C., Gärling T., Schneider C.M., Fujii S. Public attitudes towards policy measures for reducing private car use. Environmental Science and Policy 2005, 8(1):57-66.
27. Poortinga W., Steg L., Vlek C., Wiersma G. Household preferences for energy saving measures: a conjoint analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology 2003, 24(1):49-64.
28. Posthuma R.A., Dworkin J.B. A behavioural theory of arbitrator acceptability. International Journal of Conflict Management 2000, 11(3):249-266.
29. Rienstra S.A., Rietveld P., Verhoef E.T. The social support for policy measures in passenger transport. A statistical analysis for the Netherlands. Transportation Research D 1999, 4:181-200.
30. Schade J., Schlag B. Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2003, 6:45-61.
31. Schuitema G., Steg L., Forward S. Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm. Transportation Research-A: Policy and Practice 2010, 44:99-109.
32. Schuitema G., Steg L., Rothengatter J.A. The acceptability, personal outcome expectations and expected effects of transport pricing policies. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2010, 30:587-593.
33. Schuitema G., Steg L., van Kruining M. When are transport pricing policies fair and acceptable. Social Justice Research 2011, 24:66-84.
34. Steg L., Dreijerink L., Abrahamse W. Why are energy policies acceptable and effective?. Environment and Behavior 2006, 38:92-111.
35. Steg L., Dreijerink L., Abrahamse W. Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: a test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2005, 25:415-425.
36. Steg L., Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2009, 29:309-317.
37. Teh T., Dougherty M.P., Camire M.E. How do consumer attitudes influence acceptance of a novel wild blueberry-soy product?. Journal of Food Science 2007, 72(7):516-521.
38. Terrade F., Pasquier H., Reerinck-Boulanger J., Guingouain G., Somat A. L'acceptabilité sociale: La prise en compte des determinants sociaux dans l'analse de l'acceptabilité des systems technologiques. Le Travail Humain: A Bilingual and Multi-Disciplinary Journal in Human Factors 2009, 72(4):383-395.
39. Von Borgstede C., Johansson L.-O., Nilsson A. Social dilemmas: motivational, individual and structural aspects influencing cooperation. Environmental Psychology: An Introduction 2012, 175-184. BPS Blackwell, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester. L. Steg, A. Van den Berg, J.I.M. De Groot (Eds.).
40. Wilke H.A.M. Greed, efficiency and fairness in resource management situations. European Review of Social Psychology 1991, 2:165-187.
41. Yamagishi T. The structural goal/expectation theory of cooperation in social dilemmas. Advances in Group Processes 1986, vol. 3:51-87. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
42. Zlatev M., Pahl S., White M. Perceived risk and benefit for self and others as predictors of smokers' attitudes towards smoking restrictions. Psychology and Health 2010, 25:167-182.