Regeneration of different plant functional types in a masson pine forest following pine wilt disease

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Hu, Guang ^a   Xu, Xuehong ^b   Wang, Yuling ^c   Lu, Gao ^d   Feeley, Kenneth J ^e   Yu, Mingjian ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^c State Forestry Administration   (China)

^d Xiangshan Forest Pest Control and Quarantine Station   (China)

^e FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CANOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EVERGREEN; FERN; FOREST; FORESTRY; GENETIC TRAIT; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HERB; NEMATODIASIS; NONHUMAN; PINE WILT DISEASE; PLANT COMMUNITY; PLANT REGENERATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; ANIMAL; CHINA; CLASSIFICATION; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GEOGRAPHY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PINE; PLANT; PLANT DISEASE; POPULATION DENSITY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TREE; TYLENCHIDA;

FILICOPHYTA;

ANIMALS; CHINA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; GEOGRAPHY; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; PINUS; PLANT DISEASES; PLANTS; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TREES; TYLENCHIDA;

EID: 84860491249     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036432     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Enda N, (1997) The damage of pine wilt disease and control in Asia. Forest Pest 46: 182-188.
2. Fujihara M, Hada Y, Toyohara G, (2002) Changes in the stand structure of a pine forest after rapid growth of Quercus serrata Thunb. Forest Ecology and Management 170: 55-65.
3. Mota M, Braasch H, Penas M, Burgermeister A, Metge W, et al. (1999) First report of Bursaphelencus xylophilus in Portugal and in Europe. Nematologica 1: 727-734.
4. Mamiya U, (1986) Pine wilt disease in China. Forest Pest 35: 145-150.
5. Khan A, Gbadegesin R, (1991) On the occurrence of nematode induced pine wilt disease in Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Nematology 9: 57-58.
6. Yu M, Xu X, Ding P, (2011) Economic loss versus ecological gain: the outbreaks of invaded pinewood nematode in China. Biological Invasions 13: 1283-1290.
7. Chineses National Forestry Bureau (2011) Announcement of Chinese National Forestry Bureau, No. 3, 2011.
8. Dwinell LD, (1997) The pinewood nematode: regulation and mitigation. Annual Review of Phytopathology 35: 153-166.
9. Futai K, (2003) The mass-dieback of pine trees is an infectious disease of forest Tokyo Bunichi-Sogo-Shuppan.
10. Shi J, Luo Y, Wu H, Wang L, Wang GZ, (2007) Traits of Masson pine affecting attack of pine wood nematode. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 49: 1763-1771.
11. Fujihara M, (1996) Development of secondary pine forests after pine wilt disease in western Japan. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 729-738.
12. Shimizu Y, (2005) A vegetation change during a 20-year period following two continuous disturbances (mass-dieback of pine trees and typhoon damage) in the Pinus-Schima secondary forest on Chichijima in the Ogasawara (Bonin) Islands: which won, advanced saplings or new seedlings? Ecology Research 20: 708-725.
13. Fujihara M, (1997) Structure of Pinus luchuensis forests affected by pine wilt disease in northern Taiwan. Natural History Research Special Issue4: 113-126.
14. Sakamoto KN, Fujikawa N, Chiba K, Yoshikawa K, (1995) Stand structure and dynamics of Pinus densiflora forests damaged by pine wilt disease in the southern part of Okayama Prefecture. J Jap Soc Revegt Tech 21: 18-28.
15. Toyohara G, Fujihara M, (1998) Succession of secondary forests affected by pine wilt disease in western Japan followed on vegetation maps. Applied Vegetation Science 1: 259-266.
16. McIntyre S, Díaz S, Lavorel S, Cramer W, (1999) Plant functional types and disturbance dynamics. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 604-608.
17. McIntyre S, Lavorel S, Landsberg J, Forbes TDA, (1999) Disturbance response in vegetation: towards a global perspective on functional traits. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 621-630.
18. Noble IR, Gitay H, (1996) A functional classification for predicting the dnamics of landscapes. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 337-346.
19. Walker BH, (1992) Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conservation Biology 6: 18-23.
20. Navarro T, Alados CL, Cabezudo B, (2006) Changes in plant functional types in response to goat and sheep grazing in two semi-arid shurblands of SE Spain. Journal of Arid Environments 64: 298-322.
21. Noble IR, Slatyer RO, (1980) The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 43: 5-21.
22. Pausas JG, (1999) Response of plant functional types to changes in the fire regime in Mediterranean ecosystems: a simulation approach. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 717-722.
23. Rusch GM, Pausas JG, Lepš J, (2003) Plant Functional Types in relation to disturbance and land use: Introduction. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 307-310.
24. Ewers BE, Pendall E, (2008) Spatial patterns in leaf area and plant functional type cover across chronosequences of sagebrush ecosystems. Plant Ecology 194: 67-83.
25. Kleyer M, (1999) Distribution of plant functional types along gradients of diturbance intensity and resource supply in an agricultural landscape. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 697-708.
26. Korner K, Jeltsch F, (2008) Detecting general plant functional type responses in fragmented landscapes using spatially-explicit simulations. Ecological Modelling 210: 287-300.
27. Díaz S, Cabido M, (1997) Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change. Journal of Vegetation Science 8: 463-474.
28. Department of Forestry of Zhejiang Province (2002) Natural Resources of Zhejiang Forestry: Forest Volume Beijing China Agricultural Press.
29. Editorial Committee of Flora of Zhejiang (1993) Flora of Zhejiang Hangzhou Zhejiang Science and Technology Press.
30. Fujihara M, (1995) Succession of secondary pine forests after pine wilt disease in San-yo district, Western Japan. Natural History Research 3: 161-171.
31. Ke G, Werger MJA, (1999) Different responses to shade of evergreen and deciduous oak seedlings and the effect of acorn size. Acta Oecologica 20: 579-586.
32. Bowman D, Prior LD, (2005) Why do evergreen trees dominate the Australian seasonal tropics? Australian Journal of Botany 53: 379-399.
33. Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Díaz S, (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany 51: 335-380.
34. Poorter L, Bongers F, (2006) Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance across 53 rain forest species. Ecology 87: 1733-1743.
35. Kobe RK, Pacala SW, Silander JA, Canham CD, (1995) Juvenile tree survivorship as a component of shade tolerance. Ecological Applications 5: 517-532.
36. Shibuya M, Haga N, Sasaki T, Kikuchi S, Haruki M, et al. (2004) Stand and self-thinning dynamics in natural Abies stands in northern Hokkaido, Japan. Ecological Research 19: 301-309.
37. Xue L, Hagihara A, (2008) Density effects on organs in self-thinning Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc. stands. Ecological Research 23: 689-695.
38. Eviner VT, (2004) Plant traits that influence ecosystem processes vary independently among species. Ecology 85: 2215-2229.
39. Moghaddas EEY, Stephens SL, (2007) Thinning, burning, and thin-burn fuel treatment effects on soil properties in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 250: 156-166.
40. Walters MB, (1996) Are shade tolerance, survival, and growth linked? Low light and nitrogen effects on hardwood seedlings. Ecology 77: 841-853.
41. Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF, (1997) Forest structure and sustainable temperate forestry: a case study from Australia. Conservation Biology 11: 1053-1068.
42. Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF, (2002) Conserving Forest Biodiversity Washington, DC Island Press.
43. Nakagoshi N, Nehira K, Takahashi F, (1987) The role of fire in pine forests of Japan. In: Trabaud L, editors. The role of fire in ecological systems The Hague SPB Academic Publishing pp. 91-119.
44. Olsen MF, (1989) Aspects of the ecology and physiology of rainforest systems following large scale natural disturbance Queensland University of Queensland.
45. Greenberg C, Neary D, Harris L, Linda S, (1995) Vegetation recovery following high-intensity wildfire and silvicultural treatments in sand pine scrub. American Midland Naturalist 133: 149-163.
46. Drever C, Messier C, Bergeron Y, Doyon F, (2006) Fire an canopy species composition in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence forest of Temiscamingue, Quebec. Forest Ecology and Management 231: 27-37.
47. Drobyshev I, Goebel PC, Hix DM, Corace RG III, Semko-Duncan ME, (2008) Interactions among forest composition, structure, fuel loadings and fire history: A case study of red pine-dominated forests of Seney National Wildlife Refuge, Upper Michigan. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 1723-1733.
48. Zhang QF, Pregitzer KS, Reed DD, (1999) Catastrophic disturbance in the presettlement forests of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 29: 106-114.
49. Taoda H, (1988) Succession of Pinus thunbergii forest on coastal dunes, Hitotsuba Coast, Kyushu, Japan. Hikobia 10: 119-128.