Re: Microarray application in prenatal diagnosis: A position statement from the cytogenetics working group of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU), November 2011

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 601-602

  Fiorentino, F ^a   Baldi, M ^a  

^a GENOMA Molecular Genetics Laboratory   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME DISORDER; FEMALE; GENETICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NOTE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;

CHROMOSOME DISORDERS; CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 84860440226     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: 14690705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.11158     Document Type: Letter

References (17)

1. Novelli A, Grati FR, Ballarati L, Bernardini L, Bizzoco D, Camurri L, Casalone R, Cardarelli L, Cavalli P, Ciccone R, Clementi M, Dalpr L, Gentile M, Gelli G, Grammatico P, Malacarne M, Nardone AM, Pecile V, Simoni G, Zuffardi O, Giardino D,. Microarray application in prenatal diagnosis: a position statement from the cytogenetics working group on behalf of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU), November 2011. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 384-388.
2. Hillman SC, Pretlove S, Coomarasamy A, McMullan DJ, Davison EV, Maher ER, Kilby MD,. Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 6-14.
3. Maya I, Davidov B, Gershovitz L, Zalzstein Y, Taub E, Coppinger J, Shaffer LG, Shohat M,. Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CMA) in a prenatal setting. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 1131-1137.
4. Park SJ, Jung EH, Ryu RS, Kang HW, Ko JM, Kim HJ, Cheon CK, Hwang SH, Kang HY,. Clinical implementation of whole-genome array CGH as a first-tier test in 5080 pre and postnatal cases. Mol Cytogenet 2011; 9: 4-12.
5. Armengol L, Nevado J, Serra-Juhé C, Plaja A, Mediano C, García-Santiago FA, García-Aragonés M, Villa O, Mansilla E, Preciado C, Fernández L, Mori MA, García-Pérez L, Lapunzina PD, Pérez-Jurado LA,. Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in invasive prenatal diagnosis. Hum Genet 2012; 131: 513-523.
6. Fiorentino F, Caiazzo F, Napolitano S, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Sessa M, Nuccitelli A, Biricik A, Gordon A, Rizzo G, Baldi M,. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 1270-1282.
7. Lee CN, Lin SY, Lin CH, Shih JC, Lin TH, Su YN,. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies. BJOG 2012; DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03279.x. [Epub ahead of print].
8. Shaffer LG, Coppinger J, Alliman S, Torchia BA, Theisen A, Ballif BC, Bejjani BA,. Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 789-795.
9. Ogilvie CM, Yaron Y, Beaudet AL,. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: For prenatal diagnosis, should we offer less or more than metaphase karyotyping? Prenat Diagn 2009; 29: 11-14.
10. Faas BH, van der Burgt I, Kooper AJ, Pfundt R, Hehir-Kwa JY, Smits AP, de Leeuw N,. Identification of clinically significant, submicroscopic chromosome alterations and UPD in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies using genome-wide 250k SNP array analysis. J Med Genet 2010; 47: 586-594.
11. Bui TH, Vetro A, Zuffardi O, Shaffer LG,. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: is conventional chromosome analysis necessary in the post-array CGH era? Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 235-243.
12. Berg JS, Potocki L, Bacino CA,. Common recurrent microduplication syndromes: diagnosis and management in clinical practice. Am J Med Genet A 2010; 152A: 1066-1078.
13. Darilek S, Ward P, Pursley A, Plunkett K, Furman P, Magoulas P, Patel A, Cheung SW, Eng CM,. Pre- and postnatal genetic testing by array-comparative genomic hybridization: genetic counseling perspectives. Genet Med 2008; 10: 13-18.
14. Menten B, Maas N, Thienpont B, Buysse K, Vandesompele J, Melotte C, de Ravel T, Van Vooren S, Balikova I, Backx L, Janssens S, De Paepe A, De Moor B, Moreau Y, Marynen P, Fryns JP, Mortier G, Devriendt K, Speleman F, Vermeesch JR,. Emerging patterns of cryptic chromosomal imbalance in patients with idiopathic mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies: a new series of 140 patients and review of published reports. J Med Genet 2006; 43: 625-633. (Pubitemid 44214899)
15. Scott SA, Cohen N, Brandt T, Toruner G, Desnick RJ, Edelmann L,. Detection of low-level mosaicism and placental mosaicism by oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization. Genet Med 2010; 12: 85-92.
16. Valli R, Marletta C, Pressato B, Montalbano G, Lo Curto F, Pasquali F, Maserati E,. Comparative genomic hybridization on microarray (a-CGH) in constitutional and acquired mosaicism may detect as low as 8% abnormal cells. Mol Cytogenet 2011; 9: 4-13.
17. Ahn JW, Mann K, Walsh S, Shehab M, Hoang S, Docherty Z, Mohammed S, Mackie Ogilvie C,. Validation and implementation of array comparative genomic hybridisation as a first line test in place of postnatal karyotyping for genome imbalance. Mol Cytogenet 2010; 3: 9.