Speech Acts Within Facebook Status Messages

Journal of Language and Social Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 176-196

  Carr, Caleb T ^a   Schrock, David B ^b   Dauterman, Patricia ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

CMC; computer mediated communication; identity construction; social network site; speech act

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860432949     PISSN: 0261927X     EISSN: 15526526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X12438535     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Baron N. S.,Squires L.,Tench S.,Thompson M.Mobile communications: Re-negotiation of the social sphere. Ling R.Pedersen P., ed. London, England: Springer-Verlag; 2005:293-311.
2. Baym N. K.The performance of humor in computer-mediated communication.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 1995;1 (2).
3. Boyd D.Youth, identity, and digital media. Buckingham D., ed. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2008:119-142.
4. Boyd d.m.,Ellison N. B.Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2008;13:210-230.
5. Brandenburg C.The newest way to screen job applicants: A social networker's nightmare.Federal Communications Law Journal. 2008;60:597-626.
6. Buzzanell P. M.,Burrell N. A.,Stafford R. S.,Berkowitz S.When I call you up and you're not there: Application of communication accommodation theory to telephone answering machine messages.Western Journal of Communication. 1996;60:310-336.
7. Carr C. T. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association; 2008 Montreal, Quebec; 2008.
8. Clark H. H.Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1996:.
9. Cooren F.Handbook of language and social interaction. Fitch K. L.Sanders R. E., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005:21-40.
10. Culnan M. J.,Markus M. L.Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective. Jablin F. M.Putnam L. L.Roberts K. H.Porter L. W., ed. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 1987:421-443.
11. Daft R. L.,Lengel R. H.Research in organizational behavior. Straw B.Cummings L. L., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1984:191-233.
12. DiMicco J. M.,Millen D. R. Paper presented at the GROUP 2007; 2007Sanibel Island, FL; 2007.
13. Donath J.,Boyd d. m.Public displays of connection.BT Technology Journal. 2004;22:71-82.
14. Duthler K. W.The politeness of requests made via email and voicemail: Support for the hyperpersonal model.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2006;11:500-521.
15. Egner I.Intercultural aspects of the speech act of promising: Western and African practices.Intercultural Pragmatics. 2006;3:443-464.
16. Ehrlich S. F.Social and psychological factors influencing the design of office communication systems. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Human Computer Interaction and Graphics Interface; 1987New York, NY; 1987. 323.
17. Ellison N. B.,Heino R.,Gibbs J.Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in online dating environments.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2006;11:415-441.
18. Ellison N. B.,Steinfield C.,Lampe C.The benefits of Facebook "friends": Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2007;12:1143-1168.
19. Faul F.,Erdfelder E.,Lang G.,Buchner A.Düsseldorf, Germany: Institut fur Experimentelle Psychologie; 2008:.
20. Hayes A. F.Statistical methods for communication science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005:.
21. Hiltz S. R.,Johnson K.,Turoff M.Experiments in group decision making: Communication processes and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research; 1986; 1986. 225.
22. Huang A. H.,Yen D. C.Usefulness of instant messaging among young users: Social vs. work perspective.Human Systems Management. 2003;22:63-72.
23. Ingham J.E-mail overload in the UK workplace.Aslib Proceedings. 2003;55:166-180.
24. Joinson A. N.Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: Motives and uses of Facebook. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Human Computer Interaction; 2008 New York, NY; 2008. 1027.
25. Kiesler S.,Siegel J.,McGuire T. W.Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication.American Psychologist. 1984;39:1123-1134.
26. Kleck C. A.,Reese C.,Behnken D. Z.,Sundar S. S. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association; 2007San Francisco, CA; 2007.
27. Korzenny F.A theory of electronic propinquity: Mediated communication in organizations.Communication Research. 1978;5:3-24.
28. Lampe C.,Ellison N.,Steinfield C.A familiar Face(book): Profile elements as signals in an online social network. Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2007New York, NY; 2007. 167.
29. Landis J. R.,Koch G. G.The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
30. Lewis K.,Kaufman J.,Christakis N.The taste for privacy: An analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2008;14:79-100.
31. Lynch O. H.Humorous communication: Finding a place for humor in communication research.Communication Theory. 2002;12:423-445.
32. McFedries P.All a-Twitter.IEEE Spectrum. 2007;44:84.
33. Meyer J. C.Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication.Communication Theory. 2000;10:310-331.
34. Nastri J.,Pena J.,Hancock J. T.The construction of away messages: A speech act analysis.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2006;11:1025-1045.
35. Ochs E.Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective.Research on Language and Social Interaction. 1993;26:287-306.
36. Overbey K. E.,Preston-Matto L.Fighting the forces: What's at stake in Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Wilcox R. V.Lavery D., ed. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield; 2002:73-84.
37. Papacharissi Z.The self online: The utility of personal home pages.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2002;46:346-368.
38. Pempek T. A.,Yermolayeva Y. A.,Calvert S. L.College students' social networking experiences on Facebook.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2009;30:227-238.
39. Rafaeli S.,Sudweeks F.Networked interactivity.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 1997;2 (4)
40. Ramirez A.,Walther J. B.Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions. Afifi T.Afifi W., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009:67-84.
41. Ramirez A.,Walther J. B.,Burgoon J. K.,Sunnafrank M.Information-seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Toward a conceptual model.Human Communication Research. 2002;28:213-228.
42. Riffe D.,Lacy S.,Fico F. G.Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005:.
43. Rogers E.Diffusion of innovations. 2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.New York, NY: Free Press; 2003:.
44. Ross A.The language of humour. New York, NY: Routledge; 1998:.
45. Searle J. R.Speech acts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1969:.
46. Searle J. R.Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1970:.
47. Siegel S.Non-parametric statistics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1956:.
48. Smock A. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association; 2010Singapore; 2010.
49. Tong S. T.,Van Der Heide B.,Langwell L.,Walther J. B.Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2008;13:531-549.
50. Trevino L. K.,Lengel R. H.,Daft R. L.Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations.Communication Research. 1987;14:553-574.
51. Walther J. B.Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective.Communication Research. 1992;19:52-90.
52. Walther J. B.,Bazarova N. N.Validation and application of electronic propinquity theory to computer-mediated communication in groups.Communication Research. 2008;35:622-645.
53. Walther J. B.,Burgoon J. K.Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction.Human Communication Research. 1992;19:50-88.
54. Walther J. B.,Carr C. T.,Choi S. S. W.,DeAndrea D. C.,Kim J.,Tong S. T.,Van Der Heide B.The networked self. Papacharissi Z., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010:17-38.
55. Walther J. B.,Van Der Heide B.,Hamel L. M.,Shulman H. C.Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook.Communication Research. 2009;36:229-253.