Augmenting acid with affective details to assess credibility

European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 141-158

  Ansarra, Ryan ^a   Colwell, Kevin ^a   Hiscock Anisman, Cheryl ^b   Hines, Amber ^a   Fleck, Roland ^b   Cole, Lindsey ^a   Belarde, Delyana ^b  

^a SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Content analysis; Credibility assessment; Detecting deception; Investigative interviewing; Testimony

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860431605     PISSN: 18891861     EISSN: 19894007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Colwell, K., Colwell, L. H., Perry, A. T., Wasieleski, D., & Billings, T. (2008). Test of Malingered Incompetence: A forced-choice instrument for assessing malingering in competence to stand trial evaluations. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 26(3), 17-42.
2. Colwell, K., Hiscock, C. K., & Memon, A. (2002). Interviewing techniques and the assessment of statement credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 287-300. doi: 10.1002/acp.788
3. Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Memon, A., Rachel, A., & Colwell, L. (2007) Vividness and spontaneity of statement detail characteristics as predictors of witness credibility. American Journal of Forensic Psychology 25(1), 1-25.
4. Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C. K., Memon, A., Taylor, L., & Prewett, J. (2008). Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID): An integrated system of investigative interviewing and detecting deception. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 4(3) 167-180. doi: 10.1002/jip.73
5. Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Memon, A., Woods, D., & Michlik, P. (2006). Strategies of impression management among deceivers and truth-tellers: How liars attempt to convince. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 24(2), 31-38.
6. Colwell, K., & Sjerven, E. (2005) The "Coin-in-Hand" stratagem for the forensic assessment of malingering. American Journal of Forensic Psychology 23(1) 83-90.
7. Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications, Ltd.
8. Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2006). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
9. Hartwig, M., & Doering, N. (2009, March). Strategies of the deception game: A social cognitive theory of the psychology of innocence and guilt. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Psychology-Law Society, San Antonio, Texas.
10. Hiscock, M., & Hiscock, C. K. (1989) Refining the forced-choice method for the detection of malingering. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11(6), 967-974. doi: 10.1080/01688638908400949
11. Johnson, M. K. (1988). Reality monitoring: An experimental phenomenological approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 390-394. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.117.4.390
12. Köhnken, G., Schimossek, E., Aschermann, E., & Hofer, E. (1995). The cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adult's statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 671-684. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.6.671
13. Masip, J., Sporer, S., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2005). The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11, 99-122. doi: 10.1080/10683160410001726356
14. Memon, A., Fraser, J., Colwell, K., Odino, G., & Mastroberardino, S. (2010). Distinguishing truthful from invented accounts using reality monitoring criteria. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 177-194. doi: 10.1348/135532508X401382
15. Olson, C. L. (1976). On choosing a test statistic in manova. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 579-586. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.579
16. Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443-458. doi: 10.1007/BF01498980
17. Sporer, S. L. (2004). Reality monitoring and the detection of deception. In P. A. Granhag & L.A. Strömwall (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 64-102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., Fisher, R. P., Hillman, J., & Sperry, K. (2009). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 159-166. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9143-y