Brownfield redevelopment toward sustainable urban land use in China

Chinese Geographical Science

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 127-134

  Cao, Kang ^a   Guan, Hua ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Brownfield; Land use; Redevelopment; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

BROWNFIELD SITE; LAND USE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REDEVELOPMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY;

ASIA; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST;

EID: 34347229050     PISSN: 10020063     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11769-007-0127-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alker S, Joy V, Roberts P et al., 2000. The definition of brownfield. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(1): 49-69.
2. APA (American Planning Association), 2005. Legislative Priority: Brownfields. http://www.planning.org/priorities/brownfields.htm.
3. De Sousa C, 2000. Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield development: a private sector perspective on the costs and risks associated with brownfield redevelopment in the great Toronto area. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(6): 831-853.
4. Dixon T, 2004. Volume housebuilders start to dig brownfield. The Estates Gazette, 11(20): 154-155.
5. Geltman E G, 2000. Recycling Land: Understanding the Legal Landscape of Brownfield Development. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 339.
6. Greenberg M, Lowrie K, Mayer H et al., 2001. Brownfield redevelopment as a smart growth option in the United States. The Environmentalist, 21: 129-143.
7. Meyer P J, 2000. Lessons from private sector brownfield redevelopers. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1): 46-57.
8. Ministry of Construction of China, 1991. Standard for Urban Land Use Classification and Planning Construction Land (GBJ 137-90). Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press. (in Chinese)
9. Ministry of Construction of China, 2002. Notice about Enforcing the Planning Manage of National Land Use Right Transferring ([2002] 270). http://www.cin.gov.cn/planning/file/2003032001.htm (in Chinese)
10. Ministry of Land and Resources of China, 2001. National Land Use Classification ([2001]255). www.cnbm.com.cn/qgb/200702061.doc. (in Chinese)
11. Morris H, 2003. Brownfield target met for sixth year. Planning, 2003-07-06 (5).
12. NLUD (National Land Use Database), 2000. Previously Developed Land: Data Specification. London: National Land Use Database.
13. Price B, 2003. Concrete in contaminated ground: An update. Concrete, 37(2): 52-53.
14. Shephard J, Dixon T, 2004. The Role of the UK Development Industry in Brownfield Regeneration. Reading: College of Estate Management.
15. State Environmental Protection Administration of China, 1995. Environmental Quality Standard for Soils (GB 15618-1995). Beijing: Standard Press of China. (in Chinese)
16. State Environmental Protection Administration of China, 1999. Environmental Quality Risk Assessment Criteria for Soil at Manufacturing Facilities (HJ/T 25-1999). Beijing: China Environmental Science Press. (in Chinese)
17. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency), 1997. Brownfield Economic Redevelopment Initiative. Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
18. Yount K R, Meyer P B, 1999. Project scale and private sector environmental decision making: Factors affecting investments in small- and large-scale brownfield projects. Urban Ecosystems, 3: 179-193.
19. Zhang Hongbin, Jia Shenghua, 2000. The function of the urban land reserve system and its operation mechanism. City Planning Review, 24(8): 17-20. (in Chinese)
20. Zhou Xiaoyan, Kang Chun, Tian Xinwei, 2003. Discussion on land reserve institution and land market equilibrium. Chinese Land Science, 17(6): 23-26. (in Chinese)