Influence of post-harvest silviculture on understory vegetation: Implications for forage in a multi-ungulate system

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 262, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1704-1712

  Boan, Julee J ^a   McLaren, Brian E ^a   Malcolm, Jay R ^b  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Boreal forest; Moose; Post harvest regeneration; Silviculture; Understory vegetation; Woodland caribou

Indexed keywords

BOREAL FORESTS; MOOSE; POSTHARVEST; SILVICULTURE; UNDERSTORY VEGETATION; WOODLAND CARIBOU;

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEMS; FIRES; HARVESTING; HERBICIDES; MAMMALS; VEGETATION;

REFORESTATION;

ABUNDANCE; BIODIVERSITY; BOREAL FOREST; CONIFEROUS FOREST; DISTURBANCE; DOMINANCE; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; FORAGE; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HABITAT MANAGEMENT; HARVESTING; HERB; HERBICIDE; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; LOGGING (TIMBER); REGENERATION; SHRUB; SILVICULTURE; SITE PREPARATION; UNDERSTORY; UNGULATE; WOODLAND;

CANADA; ONTARIO [CANADA];

ALCES ALCES; CONIFEROPHYTA; MAMMALIA; RANGIFER TARANDUS; RANGIFER TARANDUS CARIBOU; UNGULATA;

EID: 84860391203     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.07.022     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Arlidge, C., 1995. Wood supply and woodland caribou on the Nakina/Geraldton forests and the Lac Seul forest. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada. NWST Technical Report TR-97.
2. Arsenault D. Impact of fire behaviour on postfire forest development in a homogeneous boreal landscape. Can. J. Forest Res. 2001, 31:1367-1374.
3. Beatty S.W., Scholes O.D.V. Leaf litter effect on plant species composition of deciduous forest treefall pits. Can. J. Forest Res. 1988, 18:553-559.
4. Bell F.W., Lautenschlager R.A., Wagner R.G., Pitt D.G., Hawkins J.W., Ride K.R. Motormanual, mechanical and herbicide release affects early successional vegetation in northwestern Ontario. Forest Chron. 1997, 73:61-68.
5. Bergeron Y., Dubuc M. Succession in the southern part of the Canadian boreal forest. Vegetatio 1989, 79:51-63.
6. Bergeron Y., Leduc A., Harvey B.D., Gauthier S. Natural fire regime: a guide for sustainable management of the Canadian boreal forest. Silva Fennica 2002, 36:81-95.
7. Bowman J., Ray J.C., Magoun A.J., Johnson D.S., Dawson F.N. Roads, logging, and the large-mammal community of an eastern Canadian boreal forest. Can. J. Zool. 2010, 88:454-467.
8. Briand Y., Ouellet J.P., Dussault C., St-Laurent M.H. Fine-scale habitat selection by female forest-dwelling caribou in managed boreal forest: empirical evidence of a seasonal shift between foraging opportunities and anti-predator strategies. Ecoscience 2009, 3:330-340.
9. Brace L.G., Bella L.E. Understanding the understory: dilemma and opportunity. Management and Utilization of Northern Mixedwoods. Proc. Symp., April 11-14 1988, Can. Forest Sen., North. Forest Cent. Edmonton, AB, NOR-X-296 1988, 69-86. Edmonton, Alberta. J.K. Samoil (Ed.).
10. Brown, G.S., 2011. Patterns and causes of demographic variation in a harvested moose population: evidence for the effects of climate and density-dependent drivers. J. Anim. Ecol. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01875.x.
11. Brown G.S., Rettie J.W., Brooks R.J., Mallory F.F. Predicting the impacts of forest management on woodland caribou habitat suitability in black spruce boreal forest. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2007, 245:137-147.
12. Carleton T.J., MacLellan P. Woody vegetation responses to fire versus clear-cut logging: a comparative survey in the central Canadian boreal forest. Ecoscience 1994, 1:141-152.
13. Courtois R., Gingras A., Fortin D., Sebbane A., Rochette B., Breton L. Demographic and behavioural response of woodland caribou to forest harvesting. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38:2837-2849.
14. Crête M. Forestry practices in Quebec and Ontario in relation to moose population dynamics. Forest Chron. 1988, 64:246-250.
15. Crête M., Bedard J. Daily browse consumption by moose in the Gaspé Peninsula. Quebec. J. Wildl. Manage. 1975, 39:368-373.
16. Cumming H.G. Sixteen years of moose browse surveys in Ontario. Alces 1987, 23:125-156.
17. Cumming H.G., Kelly C.P., Lautenschlager R.A., Thapa S. Effects of conifer release with vision (glyphosate) on moose forage quality. Alces 1995, 31:221-232.
18. Dufrêne M., Legendre P. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 1997, 67:345-366.
19. Dussault C., Courtois R., Ouellet J.P. A habitat suitability index model to assess moose habitat selection at multiple spatial scales. Can. J. Forest Res. 2006, 36:1097-1107.
20. Environment Canada, 2005. Canadian climate normals 1971-2000. (accessed on 27.03.2010). http://www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climate_normals.
21. Ferguson S.H., Elkie P.C. Seasonal movement patterns of woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou). J. Zool. 2004, 262:125-134.
22. Flinn M.A., Wein R.W. Depth of underground plant organs and theoretical survival during fire. Can. J. Bot. 1977, 55:2550-2554.
23. Freedman B., Woodley S., Loo J. Forestry practices and biodiversity, with particular reference to the Maritime Provinces of eastern Canada. Environ. Rev. 1994, 2:33-77.
24. Gasaway W.C., DuBois S.D., Boertje R.D., Reed D.J., Simpson D.T. Response of radio-collared moose to a large burn in central Alaska. Can. J. Zool. 1989, 67:325-329.
25. Great Lakes Forest Products Ltd., 1975. Management Plan for the Caribou West Working Circle.
26. Harkonen S., Heikkila R. Use of pellet group counts in determining density and habitat of moose Alces alces in Finland. Wildl. Biol. 1999, 5:233-239.
27. Hart S.A., Chen H.Y.H. Fire, logging, and overstory affect understory abundance, diversity and composition in boreal forest. Ecol. Monogr. 2008, 78:123-140.
28. Herfindal I., Tremblay J.P., Hansen B.B., Solberg E.J., Heim M., Saether B.E. Scale dependency and functional response in moose habitat selection. Ecography 1999, 32:849-859.
29. Hillis T.L., Mallory F.F., Dalton W.J., Smiegielski A.J. Preliminary analysis of habitat utilization by woodland caribou in northwestern Ontario using satellite telemetry. Rangifer Special Issue No. 1998, 10:195-202.
30. Hins C., Ouellet J.P., Dussault C., St.Laurent M.H. Habitat selection by forest dwelling caribou in a managed boreal forest of eastern Canada: evidence of a landscape configuration effect. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2009, 257:636-643.
31. Holland J.D., Bert D.G., Fahrig L. Determining the spatial scale of species' response to habitat. Bioscience 2004, 54:227-233.
32. Irwin L.L. Foods of moose (Alces alces), and white-tailed deer, (Odocoileus virginianus), on a burn in boreal forest. Can. Field-Nat. 1985, 99:240-245.
33. Kennedy, E.R., Jordan, P.A., 1986. The impact of the herbicides glyphosate and 2,4-D on moose browse in conifer plantations in northeastern Minnisota. M.S. Thesis. Univ. Minn. 37 pp.
34. Krefting L.W., Phillips R.S. Improving deer habitat in upper Michigan by cutting mixed-conifer swamps. J. Forest 1970, 68:701-704.
35. Laurian C., Dussault C., Ouellet J.-P., Courtois R., Poulins M., Breton L. Behavior of moose relative to a road network. J. Wildl. Manage. 2000, 72:1550-1557.
36. Legare S., Bergeron Y., Pare D. Influence of forest composition on understory cover of boreal mixedwood forests of western Quebec. Silva Fennica 2002, 36:353-366.
37. Mallik A.U. Allelopathy in forested ecosystems. Allelopathy in Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry 2008, 363-377. Springer, New York. R.S. Zeng, A.U. Mallik, S.M. Luo (Eds.).
38. McCune B., Mefford M.J. PC-ORD Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 5.10 MjM Software 2006, Oregon, USA.
39. McCune B., Grace J.B. Analysis of Ecological Communities 2002, MjM Software. Gleneden Beach, OR, US.
40. McDonald, P.M., Abbott, C.S., 1997. Vegetation trends in a 31-year-old ponderosa pine plantation: effect of different shrub densities. USDA Forest Serv. Res. Pap. PSW-RP-231.
41. McKenney, D.W., Rempel, R.S., Venier, L.A., Wang, Y.H., Bisset, A.R., 1998. Development and application of a spatially explicit moose population model. Can. J. Zool., 1922-1931.
42. McLaren B., Mahoney S.P., Porter T.S., Oosenbrug S.M. Spatial and temporal patterns of use by moose of pre-commercially thinned, naturally-regenerating stands of balsam fir in central Newfoundland. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2000, 133:179-196.
43. McLoughlin P.D., Dunford J.S., Boutin S. Relating predation mortality to broad-scale habitat selection. J. Anim. Ecol. 2005, 74:701-707.
44. McNicol J., Timmermann H.R. Effects of forestry practices on ungulate populations in the boreal mixedwood forest. Proc. Boreal Mixedwood Symposium 1981, Canadian Forest Service, Sault Ste Marie, ON, pp. 141-154.
45. Messier C., Parent S., Bergeron Y. Effects of overstory and understory vegetation on the understory light environment in mixed boreal forests. J. Veg. Sci. 1998, 9:511-520.
46. Neff D.J. The pellet-group count technique for big game trend census and distribution: a review. J. Wildl. Manage. 1968, 32:597-614.
47. Nikula A., Heikkinen S., Helle E. Habitat selection of adult moose Alces alces at two spatial scales in central Finland. Wildl. Biol. 2004, 10:121-135.
48. Newmaster S.G., Parker W.C., Bell F.W., Paterson J.M. Effects of forest floor disturbances by mechanical site preparation on floristic diversity in a central Ontario clearcut. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2007, 246:196-207.
49. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 2009. Ontario's Woodland Caribou Conservation Plan. (accessed 10.04.2011). http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/stdprodconsume/groups/lr/@mnr/@species/documents/document/277783.pdf.
50. Peek, J.M., Urich, D.L., MacKie, R.J., 1976. Moose habitat selection and relationship to forest management in northeastern Minnisota. Wildl. Monogr. 48, 65 p.
51. Paré D., Bergeron Y. Effect of colonizing tree species on soil nutrient availability in a clay soil of the boreal mixedwood. Can. J. Forest 1996, 26:1022-1031.
52. Perera A.H., Euler D.L. Landscape ecology in forest management: an introduction. Ecology of a Managed Terrestrial Landscape: Patterns and Processes of Forest Landscapes in Ontario 2000, 3-11. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources/UBC Press, Vancouver, BC. A.H. Perera, D.L. Euler, I.D. Thompson (Eds.).
53. Racey G., Harris A., Gerrish L., Armstrong E., McNicol J., Baker J. Forest Management Guidelines for the Conservation of Woodland Caribou: A Landscape Approach 1999, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Thunder Bay, ON, 69 pp.
54. Raymond K.S., Griffith B., Eschholz W.E. Winter foraging ecology of moose on glyphosate-treated clearcuts in Maine. J. Wildl. Manage. 1996, 60:753-763.
55. Rees D.C., Juday G.P. Plant species diversity on logged versus burned sites in central Alaska. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2002, 155:291-302.
56. Rempel R.S., Elkie P.C., Rodgers A.R., Gluck M.J. Timber management and natural-disturbance effects on moose habitat: landscape evaluation. J. Wildl. Manage. 1997, 61:517-524.
57. Rettie W.J., Messier F. Dynamics of woodland caribou populations at the southern limit of their range in Saskatchewan. Can. J. Zool. 1998, 76:251-259.
58. Rodgers A.R., Hutchison C., Simpson M.S. Methods for Sampling Small Mammals and their Habitats in Boreal Mixedwoods. CNFER Technical Report TR-001 2008, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada, 15 pp.
59. Ross M.S., Flanagan L.B., La Roi G.H. Seasonal and successional changes in light quality and quantity in the understory of boreal forest ecosystems. Can. J. Bot. 1986, 64:2792-2799.
60. Schaefer J.A. Long-term range recession and the persistence of caribou in the taiga. Cons. Biol. 2003, 17:1435-1439.
61. Sims, R.A, Towill, W.D., Baldwin, K.A., Uhlig, P., Wickware, G.M., 1997. Field guide to the forested ecosystem classification for northwestern Ontario. Ont. Min. Nat. Res. Northwest Sci. & Technol. Thunder Bay, Ont. Field Guide FG-03. 176 pp.
62. Sørensen T. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biologiske Skrifter/Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab 1948, 5:1-34.
63. Stone I., Ouellet J.P., Sirois L., Arseneau M.J., St-Laurent M.H. Impacts of silvicultural treatments on arboreal lichen biomass in balsam fir stands on Québec's Gaspé Peninsula: implications for a relict caribou herd. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2008, 255:2733-2742.
64. Sullivan T.P., Sullivan D.S., Lindgren P.M.F., Ransome D.B. Long-term responses of ecosystem components to stand thinning in young lodgepole pine forest. IV. Relative habitat use by mammalian herbivores. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2007, 240:32-41.
65. Thompson I.D., Baker J.A., Ter-Mikaelian M. A review of the long-term effects of post-harvest silviculture on vertebrate wildlife, and predictive models, with an emphasis on boreal forests in Ontario. Can. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2003, 177:441-469.
66. Thompson I.D., Curran W.J. A reexamination of moose damage to balsam fir-white birch forests in central Newfoundland: 27 years later. Can. J. Forest Res. 1993, 23:1388-1395.
67. Thompson I.D., Vukelich M.F. Use of logged habitats in winter by moose cows with calves in northeastern Ontario. Can. J. Zool. 1981, 59:2103-2114.
68. van Beest F.M., Mysterud A., Loe L.E., Milner J.M. Forage quantity, quality and depletion as scale-dependent mechanisms driving habitat selection of a large browsing herbivore. J. Anim. Ecol. 2010, 79:910-922.
69. Whittle C.A., Duchesne L.C., Needham T. The impact of broadcast burning and fire severity on species composition and abundance of surface vegetation in a jack pine (Pinus banksiana) clear-cut. Forest Ecol. Manage. 1997, 94:141-148.
70. Wittmer H.U., McLellan B.N., Serrouya R., Apps C.D. Changes in landscape composition influence the decline of a threatened woodland caribou population. J. Anim. Ecol. 2007, 76:568-579.