Hollow silica and silica-boron nano/microparticles for contrast-enhanced ultrasound to detect small tumors

Biomaterials

Volumn 33, Issue 20, 2012, Pages 5124-5129

  Liberman, Alexander ^a   Martinez, H Paul ^a   Ta, Casey N ^b   Barback, Christopher V ^c   Mattrey, Robert F ^c,d   Kono, Yuko ^c   Blair, Sarah L ^d,e   Trogler, William C ^a   Kummel, Andrew C ^a   Wu, Zhe ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Contrast; Imaging; Nano; Shells; Silica; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

BORON-DOPED; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CONSERVATION THERAPY; CONTRAST; CONTRAST ENHANCED ULTRASOUND; EARLY CANCER DETECTION; IN-VITRO; INTRAVENOUS INJECTIONS; MECHANICAL INDEXES; MICROSHELLS; NANO; NANO-POROUS; PARTICLE CONCENTRATIONS; PULSE FREQUENCIES; SCREENING TOOL; SHELLS; SILICA PARTICLES; SMALL TUMORS;

CHEMOTHERAPY; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; MAMMOGRAPHY; POLYSTYRENES; SILICA; TUMORS; ULTRASONICS; VAPORS;

ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS;

BORON; MICROSPHERE; NANOPARTICLE; PERFLUOROPENTANE; SILICON DIOXIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; IN VITRO STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYNTHESIS; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; ULTRASOUND;

BORON; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOPARTICLES; NEOPLASMS; SILICON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84860364575     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.066     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Klimberg V.S., Harms S., Korourian S. Assessing margin status. Surg Oncol 1999, (2):77-84.
2. Mullenix P.S., Cuadrado D.G., Steele S.R., Martin M.J., See C.S., Beitler A.L., et al. Secondary operations are frequently required to complete the surgical phase of therapy in the era of breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Am J Surg 2004, 187(5):643-646.
3. Singletary S.E. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2002, 184(5):383-393.
4. Gray R.J., Salud C., Nguyen K., Dauway E., Friedland J., Berman C., et al. Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: radioactive seed versus wire localization. Ann Surg Oncol 2011, 8(9):711-715.
5. Gray R.J., Pockaj B.A., Karstaed P.J., C.Roarke M. Radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable breast lesions is better than wire localization. Am J Surg 2004, 188(4):377-380.
6. Blair S.L., Thompson K., Rococco J., Malcarne V., Beitsch P.D., Ollila D.W. Attaining negative margins in breast-conservation operations: is there a consensus among breast surgeons?. J Am Coll Surg 2009, 209(5):608-613.
7. Nelson H.D., Tyne K., Naik A., Bougatsos C., Chan B.K., Humphrey L. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151(10):727-737. W237-42.
8. Turnbull L., Brown S., Harvey I., Olivier C., Drew P., Napp V., et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010, 375(9714):563-571.
9. Berg W.A., Blume J.D., Cormack J.B., Mendelson E.B., Lehrer D., Bohm-Velez M., et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc 2008, 299(18):2151-2163.
10. Corsetti V., Houssami N., Ferrari A., Ghirardi M., Bellarosa S., Angelini O., et al. Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. Eur J Cancer 2008, 44(4):539-544.
11. Ricci P., Cantisani V., Ballesio L., Pagliara E., Sallusti E., Drudi F.M., et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: efficacy of real time contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Ultraschall Med 2007, 28(1):57-62.
12. Sorelli P.G., Cosgrove D.O., Svensson W.E., Zaman N., Satchithananda K., Barrett N.K., et al. Can contrast-enhanced sonography distinguish benign from malignant breast masses?. J Clin Ultrasound 2010, 38(4):177-181.
13. Voight J.U. Ultrasound molecular imaging. Methods 2009, 48(2):92-97.
14. Sonne C., Xie F., Lof J., Oberdorfer J., Phillips P., Carr Everbach E., et al. Differences in definity and optison microbubble destruction rates at a similar mechanical index with different real-time perfusion systems. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003, 16(11):1178-1185.
15. De Jong N., Bouakaz A., Frinking P. Basic acoustic properties of microbubbles. Echocardiogr J Card 2002, 19(3):229-240.
16. Tiemann K., Pohl C., Schlosser T., Goenechea J., Bruce M., Veltmann C., et al. Stimulated acoustic emission: pseudo-doppler shifts seen during the destruction of nonmoving microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000, 26(7):1161-1167.
17. Martinez H.P., Kono Y., Blair S.L., Sandoval S., Wang-Rodriguez J., Mattrey R.F., et al. Hard shell gas-filled contrast enhancement particles for colour doppler ultrasound imaging of tumors. Medchemcomm 2010, 1(4):266-270.
18. Yang J., Sandoval S., Alfaro J.G., Aschemeyer S., Liberman A., Martin D.T., et al. Red-luminescent europium (III) doped silica nanoshells: synthesis, characterization, and their interaction with HeLa cells. J Biomed Opt 2011, 6(16):066012.
19. Yang J., Lind J.U., Trogler W.C. Synthesis of hollow silica and titania nanospheres. Chem Mater 2008, 20(9):2875-2877.
20. Urban-Klein B., Werth S., Abuharbeid S., Czubayko F., Aigner A. RNAi-mediated gene-targeting through systemic application of polyethylenimine (PEI)-complexed siRNA in vivo. Gene Ther 2004, 12(5):461-466.
21. Lu J., Liong M., Li Z., Zink J.I., Tamanoi F. Biocompatibility, biodistribution, and drug-delivery efficiency of mesoporous silica nanoparticles for cancer therapy in animals. Small 2010, 6(16):1794-1805.
22. Shahani K., Swaminathan S.K., Freeman D., Blum A., Ma L., Panyam J. Injectable sustained release microparticles of curcumin: a new concept for cancer chemoprevention. Cancer Res 2010, 70(11):4443-4452.