Future of Groundwater Modeling

Ground Water

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 334-339

  Langevin, Christian D ^a   Panday, Sorab ^b  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b AMEC FOSTER WHEELER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GROUND WATER;

FUTURE PROSPECT; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING;

ARTICLE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

GROUNDWATER; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84860361900     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00937.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Advisory Committee on Water Information (ACWI). 2009. A national framework for ground-water monitoring in the United States. Prepared by the Subcommittee on Ground Water. Accessed February 10, 2012.
2. Arrigo, J. 2011. Developing community infrastructure for hydrologic modeling. EOS Transactions American Geophysical Union, 92, no. 31:260. DOI: 10.1029/2011EO310003.
3. Consortium of Universities for the Advancement of Hydrologic Science Inc. (CUAHSI). 2011. A community model for water in the continental earth system. (accessed February 6, 2012).
4. Döll, P., and K. Fiedler. 2008. Global-scale modeling of groundwater recharge. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 12: 863-885. DOI: 10.5194/hess-12-863-2008.
5. Famiglietti, J., L. Murdoch, V. Lakshmi, and R. Hooper. 2008. Community modeling in hydrologic science. EOS Transactions, American Geophysical Union 89, no. 32: 292.
6. Famiglietti, J., L. Murdoch, V. Lakshmi, and R. Hooper. 2009. A community modeling platform for the hydrologic sciences: rationale and strategy. A Report from the Hydrologic Community to the National Science Foundation. CUAHSI Technical Report. DOI: 10.4211/techrpts.200911.tr8.
7. Famiglietti, J., L. Murdoch, V. Lakshmi, and R. Hooper. 2010. Towards a framework for community modeling in hydrologic science. Report from the 2nd Workshop on a Community Hydrologic Modeling Platform (CHyMP): Blueprint for a Community Hydrologic Modeling Platform. CUAHSI Technical Report. DOI: 10.4211/techrpts.201006 16.tr9.
8. Famiglietti, J.S., L.C. Murdoch, V. Lakshmi, J. Arrigo, and R. Hooper. 2011. Establishing a framework for community modeling in hydrologic science. Report from the 3rd Workshop on a Community Hydrologic Modeling Platform (CHyMP): A Strategic and Implementation Plan, Beckman Center of the National Academies, University of California at Irvine, March 15-17, 2011.
9. Flint, L.E., and A.L. Flint. 2008. Regional analysis of ground water recharge. In Groundwater Recharge in the Arid and Semiarid Southwestern United States, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1703, eds. D.A. Stonestrom, J. Constantz, T.P.A. Ferré, and S.A. Leake, 29-59. Reston, Virginia: USGS.
10. Galloway, D.L. 2010. The complex future of hydrogeology. Hydrogeology Journal 18: 807-810.
11. Gregersen, J.B., P.J.A. Gijsbers, and S.J.P. Westen. 2007. OpenMI: Open modelling interface. Journal of Hydroinformatics 09, no. 3: 175-191.
12. Harbaugh, A.W. 2011. Evolution of MODFLOW: Past and future. 2011. Groundwater Summit and 2011 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Baltimore, Maryland. May 1-4, 2011.
13. Haitjema, H., D. Feinstein, R. Hunt, and M. Gusyev. 2010. A hybrid finite-difference and analytic element groundwater model. Ground Water 48: 538-548. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00672.x.
14. Hanson, R.T., L.E. Flint, A.L. Flint, M.D. Dettinger, C.C. Faunt, D. Cayan, and W. Schmid. 2012. A method for physically based model analysis of conjunctive use in response to potential climate changes. Water Resources Research 48: W00L08. DOI: 10.1029/2011WR010774.
15. Heathcote, J.A., R.T. Lewis, and R.W.N. Soley. 2004. Rainfall routing to runoff and recharge for regional groundwater resource models. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, Geological Society of London 37: 113-130.
16. Hunt, R.J., J. Luchette, W.A. Schreuder, J.O. Rumbaugh, J. Doherty, M.J. Tonkin, and D.B. Rumbaugh. 2010. Using a cloud to replenish parched groundwater modeling efforts. Ground Water 48: 360-365. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00699.x.
17. Konikow, L.F. 1986. Predictive accuracy of a ground water model: Lessons from a post audit. Ground Water 24, no. 2: 173-184.
18. Langevin, C.D., S. Panday, R.G. Niswonger, J.D. Hughes, and M. Ibaraki. 2011. Local grid refinement with an unstructured grid version of MODFLOW. In MODFLOW and More 2011: Integrated Hydrologic Modeling-Conference Proceedings, June 5-8, 2011, International Groundwater Modeling Center, Colorado School of Mines.
19. Lemieux, J.-M., and E.A. Sudicky. 2009. Simulation of groundwater age evolution during the Wisconsinian glaciation over the Canadian landscape. Environmental Fluid Mechanics 10: 91-102. DOI: 10.1007/s10652-009-9142-7.
20. Li, Q., K. Ito, Z. Wu, C.S. Lowry, and S.P. Loheide II. 2009. COMSOL multiphysics: A novel approach to ground water modeling. Ground Water 47: 480-487. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00584.x.
21. Markstrom, S.L., R.G. Niswonger, R.S. Regan, D.E. Prudic, and P.M. Barlow. 2008. GSFLOW-Coupled ground-water and surface-water flow model based on the integration of the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS) and the Modular Ground-Water Flow Model (MODFLOW-2005): U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6-D1, 240. Reston, Virginia: USGS.
22. McDonald, M.G. 2011. Revolution of MODFLOW: Past and future. 2011 Groundwater Summit and 2011 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Baltimore, Maryland, May 1-4, 2011.
23. Narasimhan, T.N., and P.A. Witherspoon. 1976. An integrated finite difference method for analyzing fluid flow in porous media. Water Resources Research 12, no. 1: 57-64.
24. National Hurricane Center. 2011. National Hurricane Center Forecast Verification (updated October 6, 2011). (accessed February 12, 2012).
25. Oliver, D.S., and Y Chen. 2011. Recent progress on reservoir history matching: a review. Computational Geosciences 15: 185-221. DOI 10.1007/s10596-010-9194-2.
26. Panday, S., R.G. Niswonger, C.D. Langevin, and M. Ibaraki. 2011. An un-structured grid version of MODFLOW. In MODFLOW and More 2011: Integrated Hydrologic Modeling-Conference Proceedings, June 5-8, 2011, International Groundwater Modeling Center, Colorado School of Mines.
27. Refsgaard, J.C., A.L. Højberg, I. Møller, M. Hansen, and V. Søndergaard. 2010. Groundwater modeling in integrated water resources management-Visions for 2020. Ground Water 48: 633-648. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00 634.x.
28. Sudicky, E.A. 1989. The Laplace Transform Galerkin Technique: A time-continuous finite element theory and application to mass transport in groundwater. Water Resources Research 25, no. 8: 1833-1846. DOI: 10.1029/WR025i00 8p01833.
29. Therrien, R., R. McLaren, E.A. Sudicky, and S. Panday. 2010. HydroGeosphere, a three-dimensional numerical model describing fully-integrated subsurface and surface flow and solute transport, Groundwater Simulation Group, Waterloo, Ont., Canada. (accessed March 21, 2012).
30. Wagener, T., M. Sivapalan, P.A. Troch, B.L. McGlynn, C.J. Harman, H.V. Gupta, P. Kumar, P.S.C. Rao, N.B. Basu, and J.S. Wilson. 2010. The future of hydrology: An evolving science for a changing world, Water Resources Reseach 46: W05301. DOI: 10.1029/2009WR008906.
31. Whiteaker, T., and E. To. 2008. CUAHSI web services for ground water data retrieval. Ground Water 46, no. 1: 6-9.
32. Zheng, C.Z. 2011. Reflections: 2002-2010. Ground Water 49, no. 2: 129-132.