A hybrid finite-difference and analytic element groundwater model

Ground Water

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 538-548

  Haitjema, H M ^a   Feinstein, D T ^b   Hunt, R J ^b   Gusyev, M A ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL SIZE; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; FINITE DIFFERENCE; GROUNDWATER INTERACTION; GROUNDWATER MODELS; ITERATIVE COUPLING; LOCAL GRID REFINEMENT; MODEL DOMAINS; MODFLOW; MODFLOW MODEL; SINGLE CELLS; VERTICAL LEAKAGE;

FLOW PATTERNS; GROUNDWATER; WELLS;

SURFACE WATERS;

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FLOW PATTERN; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; MODEL TEST; NUMERICAL MODEL; STREAMFLOW;

FRESH WATER;

ARTICLE; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER FLOW; WATER SUPPLY;

FRESH WATER; MODELS, THEORETICAL; WATER MOVEMENTS; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 77954167246     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00672.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bakker M. Simulating groundwater flow in multi-aquifer systems with analytical and numerical Dupuit models. Journal of Hydrology 1999, 222:55-64.
2. Bakker M, Maas K, Schaars F, Asmuth JR. Analytic modeling of groundwater dynamics with an approximate impulse function for areal recharge. Advances in Water Resources 2007, 30:493-504.
3. Bakker M, Strack ODL. Analytic elements for multi-aquifer flow. Journal of Hydrology 2003, 271:119-129.
4. Barnes J, Hut P. A hierarchical o (n log n) force calculation algorithm. Nature 1986, 324:446-449.
5. Feinstein DT, Eaton TT, Hart DT, Krohelski JT, Bradbury KR. 2005a, Numerical simulation of shallow and deep groundwater flow in southeastern Wisconsin; report 2: Model results and interpretation. Technical report 41,, Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission
6. Feinstein DT, Eaton TT, Hart DT, Krohelski JT, Bradbury KR. 2005b, Numerical simulation of shallow and deep groundwater flow in southeastern Wisconsin; report 1: Data collection, conceptual model development, numerical model construction, and model calibration. Technical report 41,, Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission
7. Feinstein DT, Haitjema HM, Hunt RJ. Towards more accurate leakage and conjunctive use simulations: A coupled GFLOW-MODFLOW application. Proceedings of MODFLOW and More 2006 2006, 109-113. Golden, Colorado, International Ground Water Modeling Center, School of Mines
8. Furman A, Neuman SP. Laplace-transform analytic element solution of transient flow in porous media. Advances in Water Resources 2003, 26:1229-1237.
9. Greengard L. The numerical solution of the n-body problem. Computer in Physics 1990, 4(2):142. no.
10. Haitjema HM. Analytic Element Modeling of Groundwater Flow 1995, San Diego, California, Academic Press
11. Haitjema HM, Kelson VA, de Lange W. Selecting MODFLOW cell sizes for accurate flow fields. Ground Water 2001, 39(6):931-938. no.
12. Haitjema HM, Strack ODL. 1986, An initial study of thermal energy storage in unconfined aquifers. Technical Report PNL-5818 UC-94e,, Pacific Northwest Laboratories, operated by Battelle Memorial Institute, Contract DE-AC06-76RLO, 1830 for the Department of Energy, Subcontract B-E1234-A-0, Richland, Washington 99352, April 1986.
13. Hantush MS, Jacobs CE. Plane potential flow of groundwater with linear leakage. Eos Transactions 1954, 35(6):917-936. no.
14. Hoard CJ. Implementation of local grid refinement in MODFLOW for the Lake Michigan Basin regional flow model. 2010, Scientific Investigations Report, U.S. Geological Survey.
15. Hunt RJ. Ground water modeling applications using the analytic element method. Ground Water 2006, 44(1):5-15. no.
16. Hunt RJ, Anderson MP, Kelson VA. Improving a complex finite-difference groundwater-flow model through the use of an analytic element model. Ground Water 1998, 36(6):1011-1017. no.
17. Hunt RJ, Haitjema HM, Krohelski JT, Feinstein DT. Simulating ground water-lake interactions: Approaches, analyses, and insights. Ground Water 2003, 41(2):227-237. no.
18. Leake SA, Mock PA. Dimensionality of ground water flow models. Ground Water 1997, 35(6):930. no.
19. McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW. A modular three-dimensional finite difference ground-water flow model. Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations 1988, 586. book 6, chapter A1,, p., Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey
20. McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW. The history of MODFLOW. Ground Water 2003, 41(2):280-283. no.
21. Steffen WM, Hill MC. MODFLOW-2005, the U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model-Documentation of shared node Local Grid Refinement (LGR) and the Boundary Flow and Head (BFH) package. Modeling Techniques, Section A, Ground Water, number 6 in Techniques and Methods 6-A12 2005, chapter 12., Reston, Virginia, U.S. Department of the Interior
22. Mehl SW, Hill MC. Comparison of local grid refinement methods for MODFLOW. Ground Water 2006, 44(6):792-796. no.
23. Mitchell-Bruker S, Haitjema HM. Modeling steady state conjunctive groundwater and surface water flow with analytic elements. Water Resources Research 1996, 32(9):2725-2732. no.
24. Strack ODL. Groundwater Mechanics 1989, 07632. p., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice Hall
25. Verruijt A. Theory of Groundwater Flow 1970, London, MacMillan
26. Ward DS, Buss DR, Mercer JW, Hughes SS. Evaluation of a groundwater corrective action at the Chem-Dyne hazardous waste site using a telescopic mesh refinement modeling approach. Water Resources Research 1987, 23(4):603-617. no.
27. Zaadnoordijk JW, Strack ODL. Area sinks in the analytic element method of groundwater flow for transient groundwater flow. Water Resources Research 1993, 29(2):4121-4129. no.