Model-based estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full-field digital mammography images from image-acquisition physics and patient-image characteristics

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 8313, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Keller, Brad M ^a   Nathan, Diane L ^a   Conant, Emily F ^a   Kontos, Despina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast Cancer Risk; Breast Percent Density; Digital Mammography; Model based Assessment; PD

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; BREAST CANCER RISK; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST PERCENT DENSITIES; CLINICAL PRACTICES; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAMS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; ESTIMATION MODELS; FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; MODEL-BASED ASSESSMENT; MODEL-BASED ESTIMATION; MODEL-BASED PREDICTION; RISK ASSESSMENT TOOL;

CORRELATION METHODS; ESTIMATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; RATING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; X RAY SCREENS;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 84860359531     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.912368     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Tice, J. A., and Kerlikowske, K., "Screening and prevention of breast cancer in primary care," Prim Care, 36(3), 533-58 (2009).
2. D'Orsi, C. J., Bassett, L. W., Berg, W. A., Feig, S. A., Jackson, V. P., and Kopans, D. B., [Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS, Mammography 4th ed., Reston, Am. Col. of Rad. ], (2003).
3. Martin, K. E., Helvie, M. A., Zhou, C., Roubidoux, M. A., Bailey, J. E., Paramagul, C., Blane, C. E., Klein, K. A., Sonnad, S. S., and Chan, H. P., "Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories," Radiology, 240(3), 656-65 (2006).
4. Nicholson, B. T., LoRusso, A. P., Smolkin, M., Bovbjerg, V. E., Petroni, G. R., and Harvey, J. A., "Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions," Acad Radiol, 13(9), 1143-9 (2006).
5. Kallenberg, M. G., Lokate, M., van Gils, C. H., and Karssemeijer, N., "Automatic breast density segmentation: an integration of different approaches," Phys Med Biol, 56(9), 2715-29 (2011).
6. Yaffe, M. J., "Digital mammography," Handbook of Medical Imaging: Physics and Psychophysics, 329-372 (2000).
7. Li, D., "Comparison of breast percent density estimation from raw versus processed digital mammograms," Proc. SPIE, 7963(1), 79631X (2011).
8. Lu, L. J., Nishino, T. K., Khamapirad, T., Grady, J. J., Leonard, M. H., Jr., and Brunder, D. G., "Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit," Phys Med Biol, 52(16), 4905-21 (2007).
9. Byrne, C., Schairer, C., Wolfe, J., Parekh, N., Salane, M., Brinton, L. A., Hoover, R., and Haile, R., "Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status," J Natl Cancer Inst, 87(21), 1622-9 (1995).
10. Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Marti, R., Pont, J., Perez, E., Denton, E. R., and Zwiggelaar, R., "A novel breast tissue density classification methodology," IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed, 12(1), 55-65 (2008).
11. Keller, B., Nathan, D., Wang, Y., Zheng, Y., Gee, J., Conant, E., and Kontos, D., "Adaptive multi-cluster fuzzy C-means segmentation of breast parenchymal tissue in digital mammography," Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv, 14(Pt 3), 562-9 (2011).
12. Karssemeijer, N., "Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms," Phys Med Biol, 43(2), 365-78 (1998).
13. Bakic, P. R., Carton, A. K., Kontos, D., Zhang, C., Troxel, A. B., and Maidment, A. D., "Breast percent density: estimation on digital mammograms and central tomosynthesis projections," Radiology, 252(1), 40-9 (2009).
14. Draper, N., and Smith, H., [Applied Regression Analysis (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics)] Wiley-Interscience, (1998).
15. Pearson, K., "Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. III. Regression, heredity, and panmixia,"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 187, 253-318 (1896).
16. Ooms, E. A., Zonderland, H. M., Eijkemans, M. J., Kriege, M., Mahdavian Delavary, B., Burger, C. W., and Ansink, A. C., "Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment," Breast, 16(6), 568-76 (2007).
17. Gao, J., Warren, R., Warren-Forward, H., and Forbes, J. F., "Reproducibility of visual assessment on mammographic density," Breast Cancer Res Treat, 108(1), 121-7 (2008).