A meta-regression analysis of benchmarking studies on water utilities market structure

Utilities Policy

Volumn 21, Issue , 2012, Pages 40-49

  Carvalho, Pedro ^a   Marques, Rui Cunha ^a   Berg, Sanford ^b  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Meta regression analysis; Scale economies; Scope economies; Water utilities

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; ECONOMY OF SCALE; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; WATER ECONOMICS; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 84860341425     PISSN: 09571787     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2011.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Abbott M., Cohen B. Productivity and efficiency in the water industry. Utilities Policy 2009, 17:233-244.
2. Antonioli B., Filippini M. The use of a variable cost function in the regulation of the Italian water industry. Utilities Policy 2001, 10:181-187.
3. Ashton J. Economies of Scale, Economies of Capital Utilisation and Capital Utilisation in the English and Welsh Water Industry 1999, Working Paper Series, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth.
4. Ashton J. Total factor productivity growth and technical change in the water and sewerage industry. Serv. Ind. J. 2000, 20:121-130.
5. Baranzini A., Faust A. The Cost Structure of Water Utilities in Switzerland 2009, Working Paper Cahier de recherche, Haute école de gestion de Genève, Geneve.
6. Baumol W. Scale economies, average cost, and the profitability of marginal cost pricing. Public and Urban Economics: Essays in Honor of William S. Vickrey 1976, Lexington, D.C. R.F. Grieson (Ed.).
7. Baumol W., Panzar J., Willig R. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure 1988, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
8. Bel G., Warner M. Does privatization of solid waste and water services reduce costs? A review of empirical studies. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2008, 52:1337-1348.
9. Bel G., Fageda X., Warner M. Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services. J. Pol. Anal. Manag. 2010, 29:553-577.
10. Berg S., Marques R. Quantitative studies of water and sanitation utilities: a benchmarking literature survey. Water Policy 2011, 13:591-606.
11. Bhattacharyya A., Parker E., Raffiee K. An examination of the effect of ownership on the relative efficiency of public and private water utilities. Land Econ. 1994, 70:197-209.
12. Bhattacharyya A., Harris T., Narayanan R., Raffiee K. Specification and estimation of the effect of ownership on the economic efficiency of the water utilities. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 1995, 25:759-784.
13. Bottasso A., Conti M. Scale economies, technology and technical change in the water industry: evidence from the English water only sector. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 2008, 39:138-147.
14. Briscoe J. Invited opinion interview: two decades at the center of world water policy. Water Policy 2011, 12:147-160.
15. Bruggink T. Public versus regulated private enterprise in the municipal water industry: a comparison of operating costs. Q. Rev. Econ. Bus. 1982, 22:111-125.
16. Byrnes P., Grosskopf S., Hayes K. Efficiency and ownership: further evidence. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1986, 68:337-341.
17. Correia T., Marques R. Performance of Portuguese water utilities: how do ownership, size, diversification and vertical integration relate to efficiency?. Water Policy 2010, 13:343-361.
18. Corton L. Sector fragmentation and aggregation of service provision in the water industry. J. Prod. Anal. 2010, 2:1-11.
19. Crain W., Zardkoohi A. A test of the property-rights theory of the firm: water utilities in the United States. J. Law Econ. 1978, 21:395-408.
20. Fabbri P., Fraquelli G. Costs and structure of technology in the Italian water industry. Empirica 2000, 27:65-82.
21. Farsi M., Fetz A., Filippini M. Economies of scale and scope in Swiss multi-Utilities. Energy J. 2008, 29:123-145.
22. Farsi M., Filippini M. An analysis of cost efficiency in Swiss multi-utilities. Energ. Econ. 2009, 31:306-315.
23. Fernández D., Londoño G. Análisis de economías de escala y alcance en los servicios de acueducto y alcantarillado en Colombia 2008, Comisión de Regulación de Agua Potable y Saneamiento Básico (CRA), Bogotá.
24. Ferro G., Lentini E., Mercadier A., Romero C. Retornos a escala en agua y saneamiento: estimaciones para América Latina 2010, MPRA Paper No. 20324, Munich University Library.
25. Filippini M., Hrovatin N., Zorić J. Cost efficiency of Slovenian water distribution utilities: an application of stochastic frontier methods. J. Prod. Anal. 2008, 29:169-182.
26. Ford J., Warford J. Cost functions for the water industry. J. Ind. Econ. 1969, 18:53-63.
27. Fox W., Hofler R. Using homothetic composed error frontiers to measure water utility efficiency. Southern Econ. J. 1986, 53:461-477.
28. Fraquelli G., Giandrone R. Reforming the wastewater treatment sector in Italy: implications of plant size, structure and scale economies. Water Resour. Res. 2003, 39:1293.
29. Fraquelli G., Piacenza M., Vannoni D. Scope and scale economies in multi- utilities: evidence from gas, water and electricity combinations. Appl. Econ. 2004, 36:2045-2057.
30. Fraquelli G., Moiso V. Cost Efficiency and Economies of Scale in the Italian Water Industry 2005, Working Paper, Pavia.
31. Garcia S., Thomas A. The structure of municipal water supply costs: application to a panel of French local communities. J. Prod. Anal. 2001, 16:5-29.
32. Garcia S., Moreaux M., Reynaud A. Measuring economies of vertical integration in network industries: an application to the water sector. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 2007, 25:791-820.
33. Harbord R., Higgins J. Meta-regression in Stata. Stata J. 2008, 8:493-519.
34. Hayes K. Cost structure of the water utility industry. Appl. Econ. 1987, 19:417-425.
35. Higgins J., Thompson S. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression. Stat. Med. 2004, 23:1663-1682.
36. Hunt L., Lynk E. Privatization and efficiency in the UK water industry: an empirical analysis. Oxford B. Econ. Stat. 1995, 57:371-388.
37. Kim H. Economies of scale in multiproduct firms: an empirical analysis. Economica (new series) 1987, 54:185-206.
38. Kim H., Clarke R. Economies of scale and scope in water supply. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 1988, 18:479-502.
39. Kim E., Lee H. Spatial integration of urban water services and economies of scale. Rev. Urban Reg. Devel. Stud. 1998, 10:3-18.
40. Knapp M. Economies of scale in sewerage purification and disposal. J. Ind. Econ. 1978, 27:163-183.
41. Leamer Edward E. Let's take the con out of econometrics. Am. Econ. Rev. 1983, 73(1 March):31-43.
42. Link E. Privatization, joint production and the comparative efficiencies of private and public ownership: the UK water industry case. Fiscal Stud. 1993, 14:98-116.
43. Marques R. Comparing private and public performance of Portuguese water services. Water Policy 2008, 10:25-42.
44. Martins R., Fortunato A., Coelho F. Cost Structure of the Portuguese Water Industry: A Cubic Cost Function Application 2006, Working Paper No. 9., University of Coimbra, Coimbra.
45. Martins R., Coelho F., Fortunato A. Water Losses and Hydrographical Cost Structure Industry 2008, Working Paper No. 6, University of Coimbra, Coimbra.
46. Mizutani F., Urakami T. Identifying network density and scale economies for Japanese water supply organizations. Pap. Reg. Sci. 2001, 80:211-230.
47. Mugisha, Silver Utility benchmarking and regulation in developing countries: practical application of performance monitoring and incentives. Int. Water Assoc. 2011, xi:195.
48. Nauges C., Berg C. Economies of density, scale and scope in the water supply and sewerage sector: a study of four developing and transition economies. J. Regul. Econ. 2008, 34:144-163.
49. Panzar J., Willig R. Economies of scale in multi-output production. Quart. J. Econ. 1977, 91:481-493.
50. Parker D., Saal D. The impact of the privatization and regulation on the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: a translog cost function approach. Manage. Decis. Econ. 2001, 21:253-268.
51. Piacenza M., Vanonni D. Choosing among alternative cost function specification: an application to Italian multi-utilities. Econ. Lett. 2004, 82:415-422.
52. Prieto á, Zofio J., Álvarez I. Economías de escala, densidad y alcance en la provisión pública de infraestructura básica municipal. Hacienda Pública Española 2009, 190:59-94.
53. Rassier D., Earnhart D. Short-run and long-run implications of environmental regulation on financial performance. Contemporary Econ. Pol. 2011, 29:357-373.
54. Renzetti S. Municipal water supply and sewage treatment: costs, prices and distortions. Can. J. Econ. 1999, 32:688-704.
55. Renzetti S., Dupont D. Measuring the technical efficiency of municipal water suppliers: the role of environmental factors. Land Econ. 2009, 8:627-636.
56. Saal D., Parker D. The impact of privatization and regulation on the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: a translog cost function model. Manage. Decis. Econ. 2000, 21:253-268.
57. Saal D., Parker D. The comparative impact of privatization and regulation on productivity growth in the English and Welsh water and sewerage industry, 1985-99. Int. J. Regul. Govern. 2004, 4:139-170.
58. Saal D., Parker D. Assessing the performance of water operations in the English and Welsh water industry: a panel input distance function approach. Performance Measurement and Regulation of Network Utilities 2006, Edward Elgar Publishers, Northampton. T. Coelli, D. Lawrence (Eds.).
59. Saal D., Parker D., Weyman-Jones T. Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985-2000. J. Prod. Anal. 2007, 28:127-139.
60. Sauer J. The Efficiency of Rural Infrastructure - Water Supply in Rural Areas of Transition 2003, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Vienna.
61. Sauer J. Economies of scale and firm size optimum in rural water supply. Water Resour. Res. 2005, 41:1-13.
62. Sharp S. sbe23: meta-analysis regression. Stata Tech. Bull. 1998, 42:16-22.
63. Shih J., Harrington W., Pizer W., Gillington K. Economies of scale in community water systems. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 2006, 98:100-108.
64. Stanley T.D., Jarrell S.B. Meta-regression analysis: a quantitative method of literature surveys. J. Econ. Surv. 1989, 3:161-170.
65. Stone & Webster Consultants Investigation into the Evidence for Economies of Scale in the Water and Sewerage Industry in England and Wales 2004, Final Report, OFWAT, Birmingham.
66. Torres M., Morrison C. Driving forces for consolidation or fragmentation of the US water utility industry: a cost function approach with endogenous output. J. Urban Econ. 2006, 59:104-120.
67. Tsegai D., Linz T., Kloos J. Economic Analysis of Water Supply Cost Structure in the Middle Olifants Sub-basin of South Africa 2009, Working Paper, Social Science Research Network (SSRN).
68. Urakami T. Economies of vertical integration in the Japanese water supply industry. Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft 2007, 27:129-141.
69. Urakami T., Parker D. The Effects of Consolidation amongst Japanese Water Utilities: A Hedonic Cost Function Analysis 2008, Working Paper, Cranfield University, UK.
70. Zoric, J., 2006. Cost efficiency and regulation of Slovenian water distribution utilities: an application of stochastic frontier methods. PhD Thesis, Lugano University, Lugano.
71. Zschille M., Walter M. Cost Efficiency and Economies of Scale and Density in German Water Distribution 2010, Working Paper, German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), Berlin.