Performance of portuguese water utilities: How do ownership, size, diversification and vertical integration relate to efficiency?

Water Policy

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 343-361

  Correia, Tânia ^a   Marques, Rui Cunha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Economies of scale and economies of scope; Efficiency; Multiproduct translog cost function; Ownership; Portugal; Stochastic frontier analysis; Water utilities

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958744100     PISSN: 13667017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wp.2010.032     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Aigner, D., Lovell K. & Schmidt P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21-37.
2. Antonioli, B. & Filippini M. (2001). The use of a variable cost function in the regulation of the Italian water industry. Utilities Policy, 10(3/4), 181-187.
3. Ashton, J. (1999). Economies of scale, economies of capital utilisation and capital utilisation in the English and Welsh water industry. School of Finance and Law Working Paper Series. no. 17, University of Bournemouth.
4. Ashton, J. (2000a). Cost efficiency in the UK water and sewerage industry. Applied Economics Letters, 7(7), 455-458.
5. Ashton, J. (2000b). Total factor productivity growth and technical change in the water and sewerage industry. The Service Industries Journal, 20(4), 121-130.
6. Aubert, C. & Reynaud, A. (2005). The impact of regulation on cost efficiency: An empirical analysis of Wisconsin water utilities. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23(3), 383-409. (Pubitemid 40937384)
7. Battese, G. & Coelli, T. (1988). Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalised frontier production function and panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 38(3), 387-399.
8. Battese, G. & Coelli, T. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20(2), 325-332. (Pubitemid 26430398)
9. Baumol, W., Panzar, J. & Willig, R. (1988). Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
10. Berg, S. & Lin, C. (2008). Consistency in performance rankings: The Peru water sector. Applied Economics, 40(6), 793-805.
11. Berg, S. & Tschirhart, J. (1988). Natural Monopoly. Regulation: Principles and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
12. Bhattacharyya, A., Harris, T., Narayanan, R. & Raffiee, K. (1995a). Specification and estimation of the effect of ownership on the economic efficiency of the water utilities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25(6), 759-784. (Pubitemid 26470981)
13. Bhattacharyya, A., Harris, T., Narayanan, R. & Raffiee, K. (1995b). Technical efficiency of rural water utilities. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 20(2), 373-391.
14. Bottasso, A. & Conti, M. (2003). Cost inefficiency in the English and Welsh water industry: An heteroskedastic stochastic cost frontier approach. Economics Discussion Papers, no. 573, University of Essex.
15. Caves, D., Christensen, L. & Tretheway, M. (1980). Flexible cost functions for multiproduct firms. Review of Economics & Statistics, 62(3), 477-481.
16. Coelli, T., Rao, P. & Battese, G. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York.
17. De Witte, K. & Marques, R. (2010). Designing performance incentives, an international benchmark study in the water sector. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 18(2), 189-220.
18. Dijkgraaf, E., Geest, S. & Varkevisser, M. (2006). The Efficiency Gains of Benchmarking Dutch Water Companies. SEOR-ECRi, Erasmus University.
19. Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B. & Tavares, G. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Journal of Socio-Economics Planning Science, 42(3), 151-157.
20. Estache, A. & Kouassi, E. (2002). Sector organization, governance and the inefficiency of African water utilities. Policy Research Working Paper no. 2890, the World Bank, Washington DC.
21. Estache, A. & Rossi, M. (1999). Comparing the performance of public and private water companies in Asia and Pacific region - what a stochastic costs frontier shows. Policy Research Working Paper no. 2152, the World Bank, Washington DC.
22. Estache, A. & Rossi, M. (2002). How different is the efficiency of public and private water companies in Asia? The World Bank Economic Review, 16(1), 139-148. (Pubitemid 34696573)
23. Faria, R., Souza, G. & Moreira, T. (2005). Public versus private water utilities: Empirical evidence for Brazilian companies. Economics Bulletin, 8(2), 1-7.
24. Filippini, M., Hrovatin, N. & Zorić, J. (2007). Cost efficiency of Slovenian water distribution utilities: An application of stochastic frontier methods. In XVII Conference SIEP, 13-14 September, Pavia, Italy.
25. Fraquelli, G. & Moiso, V. (2005). Cost efficiency and economies of scale in the Italian water industry. In XVII Conference SIEP, 15-16 September, Pavia, Italy.
26. Garcia, S. & Reynaud, A. (2004). Estimating the benefits of efficient water pricing in France. Resource and Energy Economics, 26(1), 1-25. (Pubitemid 38256931)
27. Garcia, S., Moreaux, M. & Reynaud, A. (2007). Measuring economies of vertical integration in network industries: An application to the water sector. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25(4), 791-820. (Pubitemid 46844848)
28. Hunt, L. & Lynk, E. (1995). Privatisation and efficiency in the UK water industry: An empirical analysis. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57(3), 371-388.
29. Kirkpatrick, C., Parker, D. & Zhang, Y. (2004). State Versus Private Sector Provision of Water Services in Africa: A statistical, DEA and stochastic cost frontier analysis. Working Paper no. 70, Centre on Regulation and Competition, University of Manchester.
30. Lin, C. (2005). Service quality and prospects for benchmarking: Evidence from the Peru water sector. Utilities Policy, 13(3), 230-239. (Pubitemid 41086605)
31. 230-239. Lovell, K. (1993). Production frontiers and productive efficiency. In: The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. H. Fried, K. Lovell and S. Schmidt (eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
32. Lynk, E. (1993). Privatisation, joint production and the comparative efficiencies of private and public ownership: The UK water industry case. Fiscal Studies, 14(2), 98-116.
33. Marques, R. (2006). A yardstick competition model for Portuguese water and sewerage services regulation. Utilities Policy, 14(3), 175-184. (Pubitemid 44145393)
34. Marques, R. (2008). Comparing private and public performance of Portuguese water services. Water Policy, 10(1), 25-42. (Pubitemid 351220187)
35. Marques, R. & De Witte, K. (2008). Is big better? On scale and scope economies in the Portuguese water sector. Working Paper, Center of Urban and Regional Systems (CESUR), Lisbon Forthcoming in Economic Modelling.
36. Marques, R. & Silva, D. (2006). Inferência estatística dos estimadores de eficiência obtida com a técnica fronteira não paramétrica de DEA. Uma metodologia de bootstrap. Investigação Operacional, 26(1), 89-110.
37. Marques, R. & Simões, P. (2008). Does the sunshine regulatory approach work? Governance and regulation model of the urban waste services in Portugal. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(8/9), 1040-1049. (Pubitemid 351970226)
38. Martins, R., Fortunato, A. & Coelho, F. (2006). Cost structure of the Portuguese water industry: A cubic cost function application. GEMF, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
39. Meeusen, W. & Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed Error. International Economic Review, 18(2), 435-444.
40. Mizutani, F. & Urakami, T. (2001). Identifying network density and scale economies for Japanese water supply organizations. Regional Science, 80(2), 211-230. (Pubitemid 33725618)
41. Mugisha, S. (2007a). Effects of incentive applications on technical efficiencies: Empirical evidence from Ugandan water utilities. Utilities Policy, 15(4), 225-233. (Pubitemid 47440615)
42. Mugisha, S. (2007b). Performance assessment and monitoring of water infrastructure: An empirical case study of benchmarking in Uganda. Water Policy, 9(5), 475-491. (Pubitemid 47612683)
43. Nauges, C. & van den Berg, C. (2007). How "natural" are natural monopolies in the water supply and sewerage sector? Case studies from developing and transition economies. Policy Research Working Paper Series no. 4137, the World Bank, Washington DC.
44. Ohira, T. & Shirota, R. (2005). Eficiência econômica: uma aplicação do modelo de fronteira estocástica em empresas de saneamento. In XXXIII Encontro Nacional de Economia, Natal, Brazil.
45. Preyra, C. & Pink, G. (2006). Scale and scope efficiencies through hospital consolidations. Journal of health economics, 25(6), 1049-1068. (Pubitemid 44572506)
46. Saal, D. & Parker, D. (2000). The impact of privatisation and regulation on the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: A translog cost function model. Managerial and Decision Economics, 21(6), 253-268. (Pubitemid 33260275)
47. Saal, D. & Parker, D. (2005). Assessing the performance of water operations in the English and Welsh water industry: A panel input distance function approach. Working Paper, Aston Business School, Birmingham, UK.
48. Saal, D., Parker, D. & Weyman-Jones, T. (2007). Determining the contribution of technical, efficiency and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985-2000. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28(1/2), 127-139.
49. Sabbioni, G. (2007). Efficiency in the Brazilian Sanitation Sector. Econ One Research, Inc., Los Angeles.
50. Sauer, J. (2003). The Efficiency of Rural Infrastructure - Water Supply in Rural Areas of Transition. ERSA, the European Regional Science Association, Vienna, Austria.
51. Simar, L. & Wilson, P. (2008). Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: Recent developments and perspectives. In: The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Change. H. Fried, K. Lovell and S. Schmidt (eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
52. Souza, G., Faria, R. & Moreira, T. (2007). Estimating the relative efficiency of Brazilian publicly and privately owned water utilities: A stochastic cost frontier approach. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(5), 1237-1244. (Pubitemid 47416616)
53. Torres, M. & Morrison, C. (2006). Driving forces for consolidation or fragmentation of the US water utility industry: A cost function approach with endogenous output. Journal of Urban Economics, 59(1), 104-120. (Pubitemid 43040619)
54. Weeks, M. & Lay, H. (2006). Efficiency measurement in the privatised English and Welsh water and sewerage industry 1992- 2004. In 13th International Conference on Panel Data, 7-9 July, Cambridge, UK.