Histone H3 variants in Trichomonas vaginalis

Eukaryotic Cell

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 654-661

  Zubáčová, Zuzana ^a   Hostomská, Jitka ^a   Tachezy, Jan ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE; PROTOZOAL PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GENETIC TRANSFORMATION; GENETICS; GENOME; METABOLISM; MITOSIS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOSOME; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELL NUCLEUS; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOMES; G1 PHASE; G2 PHASE; GENOME, PROTOZOAN; HISTONES; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MITOSIS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEAR ENVELOPE; NUCLEOSOMES; PROTOZOAN PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION; TRANSFORMATION, GENETIC; TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS;

EUKARYOTA; PARABASALIDEA; PROTISTA; TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS;

EID: 84860330195     PISSN: 15359778     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/EC.00006-12     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ahmad K, Henikoff S. 2002. Histone H3 variants specify modes of chromatin assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:16477-16484.
2. Brooks CF, et al. 2011. Toxoplasma gondii sequesters centromeres to a specific nuclear region throughout the cell cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:3767-3772.
3. Brugerolle G. 1975. Étude de la cryptopleuromitose et de la morphogenèse de division chez Trichomonas vaginalis et chez plusiers de trichomonadines primitives. Protistologica 11:457-468.
4. Carlton JM, et al. 2007. Draft genome sequence of the sexually transmitted pathogen Trichomonas vaginalis. Science 315:207-212.
5. Cepicka I, Hampl V, Kulda J. 2010. Critical taxonomic revision of Parabasalids with description of one new genus and three new species. Protist 161:400-433.
6. Cervantes MD, Xi X, Vermaak D, Yao MC, Malik HS. 2006. The CNA1 histone of the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila is essential for chromosome segregation in the germline micronucleus. Mol. Biol. Cell 17:485-497.
7. Cui B, Liu Y, Gorovsky MA. 2006. Deposition and function of histone H3 variants in Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:7719-7730.
8. Dalal Y, Furuyama T, Vermaak D, Henikoff S. 2007. Structure, dynamics, and evolution of centromeric nucleosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:15974-15981.
9. Dawson SC, Sagolla MS, Cande WZ. 2007. The cenH3 histone variant defines centromeres in Giardia intestinalis. Chromosoma 116:175-184.
10. Dernburg AF. 2001. Here, there, and everywhere: kinetochore function on holocentric chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 153:F33-F38.
11. Diamond LS. 1957. The establishment of various trichomonads of animals and man in axenic cultures. J. Parasitol. 43:488-490.
12. Dolezal P, et al. 2005. Giardia mitosomes and trichomonad hydrogenosomes share a common mode of protein targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:10924-10929.
13. Drmota T, Král J. 1997. Karyotype of Trichomonas vaginalis. Eur. J. Protistol. 33:131-135.
14. Fichorova RN. 2009. Impact of T. vaginalis infection on innate immune responses and reproductive outcome. J. Reprod. Immunol. 83:185-189.
15. Fisk JC, Read LK. 2011. Protein arginine methylation in parasitic protozoa. Eukaryot. Cell 10:1013-1022.
16. Guerra M, et al. 2010. Neocentrics and holokinetics (holocentrics): chromosomes out of the centromeric rules. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 129:82-96.
17. Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. (Oxf.) 41:95-98.
18. Heath IB. 1980. Variant mitoses in lower eukaryotes-indicators of the evolution of mitosis. Int. Rev. Cytol. 64:1-80.
19. Henikoff S, Ahmad K. 2005. Assembly of variant histones into chromatin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21:133-153.
20. Lowell JE, Cross GA. 2004. A variant histone H3 is enriched at telomeres in Trypanosoma brucei. J. Cell Sci. 117:5937-5947.
21. Maddox PS, Oegema K, Desai A, Cheeseman IM. 2004. "Holo"er than thou: chromosome segregation and kinetochore function in C. elegans. Chromosome Res. 12:641-653.
22. Marinets A, et al. 1996. The sequence and organization of the core histone H3 and H4 genes in the early branching amitochondriate protest Trichomonas vaginalis. J. Mol. Evol. 43:563-571.
23. Nagaki K, Kashihara K, Murata M. 2005. Visualization of diffuse centromeres with centromere-specific histone H3 in the holocentric plant Luzula nivea. Plant Cell 17:1886-1893.
24. Postberg J, Forcob S, Chang WJ, Lipps HJ. 2010. The evolutionary history of histone H3 suggests a deep eukaryotic root of chromatin modifying mechanisms. BMC Evol. Biol. 10:259.
25. Raikov IB. 1994. The diversity of forms of mitosis in protozoa-a comparative review. Eur. J. Protistol. 30:253-269.
26. Ribeiro KC, Monteiro-Leal LH, Benchimol M. 2000. Contributions of the axostyle and flagella to closed mitosis in the protists Tritrichomonas foetus and Trichomonas vaginalis. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 47:481-492.
27. Ribeiro KC, Pereira-Neves A, Benchimol M. 2002. The mitotic spindle and associated membranes in the closed mitosis of trichomonads. Biol. Cell 94:157-172.
28. Riley DE, Krieger JN, Miner D, Rabinovitch PS. 1994. Trichomonas vaginalis: dominantG2 period andG2 phase arrest in a representative of an early branching eukaryotic lineage. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 41:408-414.
29. Santaguida S, Musacchio A. 2009. The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J. 28:2511-2531.
30. Schwebke JR, Burgess D. 2004. Trichomoniasis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17:794-803.
31. Sekulic N, Bassett EA, Rogers DJ, Black BE. 2010. The structure of (CENP-A-H4)2 reveals physical features that mark centromeres. Nature 467:347-351.
32. Soding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:W244-W248.
33. Sullivan KF, Hechenberger M, Masri K. 1994. Human CENP-A contains a histone H3 related histone fold domain that is required for targeting to the centromere. J. Cell Biol. 127:581-592.
34. Sutak R, et al. 2004. Mitochondrial-type assembly of FeS centers in the hydrogenosomes of the amitochondriate eukaryote Trichomonas vaginalis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:10368-10373.
35. Szenker E, Ray-Gallet D, Almouzni G. 2011. The double face of the histone variant H3.3. Cell Res. 21:421-434.
36. Talbert PB, Henikoff S. 2010. Histone variants-ancient wrap artists of the epigenome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:264-275.
37. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The CLUSTAL_X Windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:4876-4882.
38. Torres-Machorro AL, Hernandez R, Alderete JF, Lopez-Villasenor I. 2009. Comparative analyses among the Trichomonas vaginalis, Trichomonas tenax, and Tritrichomonas foetus 5S ribosomal RNA genes. Curr. Genet. 55:199-210.
39. Turner BM. 2002. Cellular memory and the histone code. Cell 111:285-291.
40. Wood CM, et al. 2005. High-resolution structure of the native histone octamer. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun. 61:541-545.
41. Zeitlin SG, et al. 2009. Double-strand DNA breaks recruit the centromeric histone CENP-A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:15762-15767.
42. Zubacova Z, Cimburek Z, Tachezy J. 2008. Comparative analysis of trichomonad genome sizes and karyotypes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 161: 49-54.
43. Zubacova Z, Krylov V, Tachezy J. 2011. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) mapping of single copy genes on Trichomonas vaginalis chromosomes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 176:135-137.