Direct CP violation in charm and avor mixing beyond the SM

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2012, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Giudice, Gian Francesco ^a   Isidori, Gino ^a,b   Paradisi, Paride ^a  

^a CERN   (Switzerland)

^b INFN LABORATORI NAZIONALI DI FRASCATI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Supersymmetry Phenomenology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860313549     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2012)060     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Y. Nir and N. Seiberg, Should squarks be degenerate?, Phys. Lett. B 309 (1993) 337 [hep-ph/9304307].
2. M. Leurer, Y. Nir and N. Seiberg, Mass matrix models: the sequel, Nucl. Phys. B 420 (1994) 468 [hep-ph/9310320].
3. G.F. Giudice, B. Gripaios and R. Sundrum, Flavourful production at hadron colliders, JHEP 08 (2011) 055 [arXiv:1105.3161].
4. G. D'Ambrosio, G. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal avor violation: an effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036].
5. + decay rates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 111602 [arXiv:1112.0938].
6. - decays at CDF, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 012009 [arXiv:1111.5023].
7. 0 decays, Phys. Lett. B 670 (2008) 190 [arXiv:0807.0148].
8. +, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 061803 [arXiv:0709.2715].
9. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collaboration, D. Asner et al., Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron and T -lepton Properties, arXiv:1010.1589.
10. Y. Grossman, A.L. Kagan and Y. Nir, New physics and CP-violation in singly Cabibbo suppressed D decays, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 036008 [hep-ph/0609178].
11. G. Isidori, J.F. Kamenik, Z. Ligeti and G. Perez, Implications of the LHCb evidence for charm CP-violation, arXiv:1111.4987.
12. M. Golden and B. Grinstein, Enhanced CP-violations in hadronic charm decays, Phys. Lett. B 222 (1989) 501.
13. J. Brod, A.L. Kagan and J. Zupan, On the size of direct CP-violation in singly Cabibbo-suppressed D decays, arXiv:1111.5000.
14. C. Quigg, Charmed meson decays and the structure of the charged weak current, Z. Phys. C 4 (1980) 55.
15. 0 mixing, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 055024 [arXiv:0906.1879].
16. +K- and future tasks, JHEP 06 (2011) 089 [arXiv:1103.5785].
17. d-mixing and in sin(2β) determinations, Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 162 [arXiv:0803.4340].
18. E. Lunghi and A. Soni, Possible evidence for the breakdown of the CKM-paradigm of CP-violation, Phys. Lett. B 697 (2011) 323 [arXiv:1010.6069].
19. A.J. Buras and D. Guadagnoli, Correlations among new CP-violating effects in δF = 2 observables, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 033005 [arXiv:0805.3887].
20. W. Altmannshofer, A.J. Buras, S. Gori, P. Paradisi and D.M. Straub, Anatomy and phenomenology of FCNC and CPV effects in SUSY theories, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 17 [arXiv:0909.1333].
21. A. Lenz et al., Anatomy of new physics in B-̄B mixing, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 036004 [arXiv:1008.1593].
22. R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, J. Jones-Perez, P. Lodone and D.M. Straub, U(2) and minimal avour violation in supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1725 [arXiv:1105.2296].
23. A. J. Beva et al., The unitarity triangle analysis within and beyond the standard model, PoS(HQL 2010)019.
24. UTfit collaboration, M. Bona et al., Model-independent constraints on δF = 2 operators and the scale of new physics, JHEP 03 (2008) 049 [arXiv:0707.0636].
25. LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurement of the CP-violating phase φs in the decay Bs → Jψ φ, arXiv:1112.3183.
26. A.J. Buras, G. Colangelo, G. Isidori, A. Romanino and L. Silvestrini, Connections between ε0=ε and rare kaon decays in supersymmetry, hep-ph/9908371.
27. F. Gabbiani, E. Gabrielli, A. Masiero and L. Silvestrini, A complete analysis of FCNC and CP constraints in general SUSY extensions of the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 477 (1996) 321 [hep-ph/9604387].
28. G. Isidori, Y. Nir and G. Perez, Flavor physics constraints for physics beyond the standard model, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 355 [arXiv:1002.0900].
29. J. Hisano, M. Nagai and P. Paradisi, Flavor effects on the electric dipole moments in supersymmetric theories: a beyond leading order analysis, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 095014 [arXiv:0812.4283].
30. G. Isidori, F. Mescia, P. Paradisi, C. Smith and S. Trine, Exploring the avour structure of the MSSM with rare K decays, JHEP 08 (2006) 064 [hep-ph/0604074].
31. Y. Nir and G. Raz, Quark squark alignment revisited, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 035007 [hep-ph/0206064].
32. S. Dimopoulos and G.F. Giudice, Naturalness constraints in supersymmetric theories with non-universal soft terms, Phys. Lett. B 357 (1995) 573 [hep-ph/9507282].
33. A.G. Cohen, D.B. Kaplan and A.E. Nelson, The more minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Lett. B 388 (1996) 588 [hep-ph/9607394].
34. ATLAS collaboration, Combination of Higgs boson searches with up to 4:9 fb-1 of pp collisions data taken at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2011-163 (2011).
35. CMS collaboration, Combination of SM Higgs searches, CMS-PAS-HIG-11-032 (2011).
36. G.F. Giudice, M. Nardecchia and A. Romanino, Hierarchical soft terms and avor physics, Nucl. Phys. B 813 (2009) 156 [arXiv:0812.3610].
37. B. Mele, Top quark rare decays in the standard model and beyond, hep-ph/0003064.
38. Particle Data Group, C. Amsler et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Lett. B 667 (2008) 1.
39. J. Brod and M. Gorbahn, εK at next-to-next-to-leading order: the charm-top-quark contribution, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 094026 [arXiv:1007.0684].
40. s), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 022002 [hep-ph/0609232].
41. c, Nucl. Phys. B 764 (2007) 62 [hep-ph/0609241].
42. UTfit collaboration, M. Bona et al., The UTfit collaboration report on the status of the unitarity triangle beyond the standard model. I. Model-independent analysis and minimal avor violation, JHEP 03 (2006) 080 [hep-ph/0509219].
43. M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics, Annals Phys. 318 (2005) 119 [hep-ph/0504231].
44. M. Raidal et al., Flavour physics of leptons and dipole moments, Eur. Phys. J. C 57 (2008) 13 [arXiv:0801.1826].
45. C. Baker et al., An improved experimental limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 131801 [hep-ex/0602020].
46. W. Griffth et al., Improved limit on the permanent electric dipole moment of Hg-199, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 101601.
47. 0 decays, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 1477.
48. G. Buchalla, G. Hiller and G. Isidori, Phenomenology of nonstandard Z couplings in exclusive semileptonic b → s transitions, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2000) 014015 [hep-ph/0006136].
49. P. Langacker and M. Plümacher, Flavor changing effects in theories with a heavy Z0 boson with family nonuniversal couplings, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 013006 [hep-ph/0001204].
50. P. Langacker, The physics of heavy Z0 gauge bosons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 1199 [arXiv:0801.1345].
51. G.C. Branco, L. Lavoura and J.P. Silva, CP violation, Int. Ser. Monogr. Phys. 103 (1999) 1.
52. ATLAS collaboration, A. Cortes-Gonzalez, Search for avor-changing neutral currents in top quark decays at ATLAS, arXiv:1201.4308.
53. CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Evidence for a mass dependent forward-backward asymmetry in top quark pair production, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 112003 [arXiv:1101.0034].
54. S. Jung, H. Murayama, A. Pierce and J.D. Wells, Top quark forward-backward asymmetry from new t-channel physics, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 015004 [arXiv:0907.4112].
55. E.L. Berger, Tevatron top quark forward-backward asymmetry | Implications for same-sign top quark pair production, arXiv:1109.3202.
56. J.F. Kamenik, J. Shu and J. Zupan, Review of new physics effects in t̄t production, arXiv:1107.5257.
57. K. Babu and S. Nandi, Natural fermion mass hierarchy and new signals for the Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 033002 [hep-ph/9907213].
58. G.F. Giudice and O. Lebedev, Higgs-dependent Yukawa couplings, Phys. Lett. B 665 (2008) 79 [arXiv:0804.1753].
59. K. Blum, Y. Hochberg and Y. Nir, Scalar-mediated t̄t forward-backward asymmetry, JHEP 10 (2011) 124 [arXiv:1107.4350].
60. Y. Hochberg and Y. Nir, Relating direct CP-violation in D decays and the forward-backward asymmetry in t̄t production, arXiv:1112.5268.